* Markus Jung <[email protected]> [08-05-13 03:18]: > Am 05.08.2013 08:57, schrieb Marie-Noëlle Augendre: > > 2013/8/5 Markus Jung <[email protected]> > > In Gmail, I have two options: 'simple' Reply or Reply to All. > > But my question is why is the 'reply-to' is right with some people, as for > > Torsten; and it is wrong (sender email instead of the list) with all the > > others (including you). The difference is not on my side, it comes in the > > message I receive, so my guess is some senders (or senders mail program) > > act differently. > > Thunderbird uses "To" by default even for replying to lists. Looks like > if Gmail does not like this ... However, i think the list server should > rewrite the header to contain a reply-to line.
No, "Reply-to" mudging is discussed *many* places on-line, undesirable. One's choice of email-client determines the actions necessary for proper addressing. -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://linuxcounter.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get your SQL database under version control now! Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
