@Dev Please please please write a blogpost. I'm having a hard time following myself! It would be a really valuable resource. We can also make teh wiki a bit more robust..
http://datameet.org/wiki/indiangeospatialdata Nisha On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Dipal Thakker <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Group, Was very keen to continue this discussion. > To continue from my last point (in my last msg), the key reason I am > seeking base-map / boundary data is that I would like to build an > infographic portal for census and other primary data sets. I gave a shot > but did not reach too far.. and keen to collaborate with like minded ppl to > take my project further. > > Best, > Dipal > > *| Dipal Thakker* > > > On 19 April 2015 at 15:50, Dipal Thakker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> @Pradeep thanks for flagging >> >> @All - Just bought to my attention that my msg from Thursday last week >> which was intended for the group was only sent to one member. >> >> ---- >> >> @Mahroof - thats very true. But the sad part is that BISAG has formal / >> informal tie-ups with commercial entities (so I have heard) >> >> @Sharad - many thanks, will have a look at the information right away. >> Will this match to Census 2011 data? >> >> @Pradeep - many thanks for your offer to help with RTI - ideally i need >> data for India (which I am sure most of us here are after). But for >> starters, I am focusing on western region so data for Guj, Raj, Mah, and MP >> will be great. >> >> All - just a thought – It will be great if DM members could collaborate >> to build an open source data platform, as I am sure there is a lot of data >> around. >> >> --- >> >> Which Brings me to my last point.. I am currently trying to build a >> retail analytics platform and as part of my exercise I am also building a >> census infographic tool for which I need two key components.. >> - primary census data which can be extrapolated (thisI have and is now >> available for free) and >> - relevant and relateable boundary / admin line data (not available). >> >> I have done some very basic work using census raw data layered on OSM >> using leaflet and driven by PHP / Posgresql >> >> Keen to talk with like minded people here.. so please feel free to reach >> out. >> >> KR, >> Dipal >> >> *| Dipal Thakker* >> >> >> >> On 19 April 2015 at 09:12, Pradeep Bhatt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Just noticed that you had sent this mail to me and not to the group. You >>> might want to send it to the group. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Pradeep >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Dipal Thakker <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> @Mahroof - thats very true. But the sad part is that BISAG has formal / >>>> informal tie-ups with commercial entities (so I have heard) >>>> >>>> @Sharad - many thanks, will have a look at the information right away. >>>> Will this match to Census 2011 data? >>>> >>>> @Pradeep - many thanks for your offer to help with RTI - ideally i need >>>> data for India (which I am sure most of us here are after). But for >>>> starters, I am focusing on western region so data for Guj, Raj, Mah, and MP >>>> will be great. >>>> >>>> All - just a thought – It will be great if DM members could collaborate >>>> to build an open source data platform, as I am sure there is a lot of data >>>> around. >>>> >>>> KR, >>>> Dipal >>>> >>>> *| Dipal Thakker* >>>> >>>> >>>> On 14 April 2015 at 12:00, Pradeep Bhatt <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Dipal, >>>>> >>>>> I can use RTI to get data from BISAG. >>>>> >>>>> Can you let me know you need data exactly for which region? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Pradeep >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Dipal Thakker < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Shashank, Shashank, and DM comrades >>>>>> >>>>>> Great if someone can point me to the most complete / recent version >>>>>> of IND_adm3 data. I am working on a census tool and I have done some work >>>>>> for few states, but stuck without detailed boundary data-sets. >>>>>> >>>>>> I visited BISAG, a nodal agency in Gujarat which I am told has the >>>>>> most detailed GIS data sets for Gujarat and most parts of India, but was >>>>>> booted out on my request to access, lease, license, or rent data set.. >>>>>> its >>>>>> such a shame that on one hand PM/govt is talking about open data and on >>>>>> other there is a thick bureaucratic red tape. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> >>>>>> *| Dipal Thakker* >>>>>> >>>>>> On 14 April 2015 at 10:41, "Sharad Lele [शरच्चंद्र लेले]" < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear Shashank: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think the bottom line of the thread below was the the IND_adm3 >>>>>>> layer is a reasonably good layer for tehsil boundaries. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regarding digitizing village boundaries: seems like we are all >>>>>>> condemned to reinvent the wheel because GoI/Planning Commission/ISRO are >>>>>>> not willing to share what they have already done (and in many cases 10 >>>>>>> times over). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For which state are you trying to create a village boundary layer? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sharad >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 14-Apr-15 10:33 AM, Shashank wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bumping this up, because I don't think this issue has been resolved >>>>>>> yet. I now have 4 different versions of Indian administrative >>>>>>> boundaries, >>>>>>> and my current nightmare is getting protected area boundaries to line up >>>>>>> with them accurately. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What's the best *open* version of Indian administrative boundaries, >>>>>>> down to the Tehsil/Block level, and is there a place from where it is >>>>>>> easily available? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (I'm not even going to ask for village-level data, because among >>>>>>> other things, what we're doing now is digitising revenue village maps >>>>>>> because the MRD itself doesn't have digitised village level data...yet.) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 2:02:37 PM UTC+5:30, D Thakker >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Eric, in my research / experience i have found that Sub-district, >>>>>>>> Mandal, Taluka, Tehsil means same and are division of District when it >>>>>>>> comes to Census. >>>>>>>> But for Revenue dept boundaries are drawn and managed by district >>>>>>>> administrative bodies who report to state administration only. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So for census - District and Sub-district are well defined >>>>>>>> boundaries, and I understand from 2011 Census India has bought a >>>>>>>> started >>>>>>>> numbering system which should make future data reconciliation easier >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But for land revenue depaetment - it really depends on the local >>>>>>>> administrative reach and function, and is managed and controlled by >>>>>>>> state >>>>>>>> admin bodies. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For eg. Surat has some discrepancy when it comes to Revenue and >>>>>>>> Census boundaries. This was something I came across and even local >>>>>>>> admin >>>>>>>> bodies in Surat were not aware >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thursday, August 7, 2014 at 8:15:45 PM UTC+5:30, Eric Dodge >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This is very interesting Sharad. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I've been looking for maps of what I've been calling >>>>>>>>> administrative blocks, that is, the units overseen by block >>>>>>>>> development >>>>>>>>> officers. MGNREGA data is aggregated at this level and I've been >>>>>>>>> hoping to >>>>>>>>> use the data to do some mapping exercises. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The census sub-districts are called differently across states >>>>>>>>> (tahsil, taluk, mandal, etc). You can see the list here: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://censusindia.gov.in/Tables_Published/Admin_Units/Admin_links/subdistrict_nomeclature.html >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I know that in all the states where census sub-districts are >>>>>>>>> called taluk, mandal, or CD block (with the exception of TN), the >>>>>>>>> census >>>>>>>>> sub-district is identical to the administrative block. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I've already completed a mapping exercise for Bihar using the >>>>>>>>> census sub-district map and the data matched up pretty well. If the >>>>>>>>> IND_adm3 data is indeed the administrative blocks then I could do a >>>>>>>>> similar >>>>>>>>> exercise with Madhya Pradesh. I'll take a look to see if the data >>>>>>>>> lines up >>>>>>>>> correctly. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Has anybody dug into this issue any deeper? I've heard that >>>>>>>>> tehsil comes from the revenue side whereas taluk, mandal, etc comes >>>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>> the administrative side but that doesn't explain why the census uses >>>>>>>>> different sub-district units across states. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>> Eric >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Sharad Lele <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If I am right, then Justin may want to rename his layer as >>>>>>>>>> CDBlocks_2001... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sharad >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, August 7, 2014 4:28:17 PM UTC+5:30, Sharad Lele >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I think I have the explanation for why I am seeing a good match >>>>>>>>>>> and you are not: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The problem lies in defining what is the 'sub-district' unit (in >>>>>>>>>>> IND_adm3). Administratively speaking, it is tehsil, below which >>>>>>>>>>> lies CD >>>>>>>>>>> block. Unfortunately, census gives information by CD block. So >>>>>>>>>>> there are >>>>>>>>>>> more 'sub-district' units in Census than tehsils in the country. >>>>>>>>>>> GDAM seems >>>>>>>>>>> to have followed the tehsil concept. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> To check: Karnataka is one state in which tehsil and CD block >>>>>>>>>>> are one and the same. That is why the sub-district layer IND_adm3 >>>>>>>>>>> matches >>>>>>>>>>> perfectly for Karnataka, but not for other states. There might be >>>>>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>> other states where this holds good, I don't know. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, so if one really wants CD block level boundaries, we >>>>>>>>>>> have to look at Justin, I guess. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> But the GDAM boundaries are not 'wrong'. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Sharad >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 07-Aug-14 9:48 AM, Devdatta Tengshe wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In Continuation of my previous email, here is a CSV file which >>>>>>>>>>> shows just how bad the GDAM dataset is. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>> Devdatta >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Devdatta Tengshe < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Sharad, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I just download the GDAM data again, to confirm what you have >>>>>>>>>>>> said. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to have to disagree with you about the quality of the >>>>>>>>>>>> IND_adm3 data. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Acoording to the 2001 Census, there are 5454 Sub Districts in >>>>>>>>>>>> India <http://www.socialjustice.nic.in/pdf/tab11.pdf>. The >>>>>>>>>>>> GDAM dataset has just 2299 features. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So clearly these taluk features do not correspond to the 2001 >>>>>>>>>>>> Census. I cross checked for some areas I have ground knowledge of, >>>>>>>>>>>> and I >>>>>>>>>>>> can say that this dataset is not from any specific era. Some >>>>>>>>>>>> tehsils in the >>>>>>>>>>>> file were created post 2001, while others created in the 90's were >>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>> present. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> In my opinion the GDAM data is pretty much unusable. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> Devdatta >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Sharad Lele < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have downloaded and checked the GADM boundaries (my version >>>>>>>>>>>>> is 2011). The taluka boundary layer probably holds good today, >>>>>>>>>>>>> becuase few >>>>>>>>>>>>> talukas get split. Districts get split regularly (every so many >>>>>>>>>>>>> years) so >>>>>>>>>>>>> the district boundary layer in this GADM set is quite of date >>>>>>>>>>>>> (may apply to >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2001 or so). The spatial registration (positional accuracy is >>>>>>>>>>>>> ~1km, and the >>>>>>>>>>>>> spatial detail is of course not as good as the boundaries given >>>>>>>>>>>>> in a Survey >>>>>>>>>>>>> of India 50k topo, but then that is an unfair standard, so by a >>>>>>>>>>>>> more >>>>>>>>>>>>> generalized standard, the quality is okay. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sharad >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, August 4, 2014 7:20:38 PM UTC+5:30, Dilip Damle >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mr Thakkar, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please also look at another post (more than one) on this >>>>>>>>>>>>>> group about Taluk Shapefiles by Justin Meyers >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So far as I know GADM is the source that has Taluk files. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am not sure about its completeness and accuracy as on today >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.gadm.org/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, August 4, 2014 6:23:07 PM UTC+5:30, D Thakker >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks Dilip for your hardwork. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have been on a lookout for all taluka / tehsil shape file, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so how do I be in a loop as I am very keen to see the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository mail / >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> list. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, August 4, 2014 9:50:26 AM UTC+5:30, Dilip Damle >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sharad, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am working on some things will revert in about a week or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may be more. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thejesh, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Go ahead, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually there was one more source a Low Resolution >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (vertices) District map by VDS technologies. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have it as Polylines in Autocad. I seem to have lost the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> original file. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If anyone has then please share it. (it does not seem to be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on their site now) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, August 3, 2014 11:32:43 PM UTC+5:30, Thejesh GN >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually its not a bad idea to list it on the wiki. Let me >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know i will create an account. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thejesh GN ⏚ ತೇಜೇಶ್ ಜಿ.ಎನ್ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://thejeshgn.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GPG ID : 0xBFFC8DD3C06DD6B0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 3, 2014 10:15 PM, "Sharad Lele" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Dilip and others: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have been following this thread with interest, but to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be honest am a bit lost now. Can someone post a summary of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which maps >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mentioned so far have what features (which coverage, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pertaining to which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> year, what attributes (such as census codes), etc.)? Would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be most helpful. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sharad >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, August 1, 2014 9:03:58 PM UTC+5:30, Dilip >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Damle wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is an old post. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However this is the appropriate place to add an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> additional source. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I had downloaded the set from Grid Geneva many years ago. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The original complete source was named as GNV197 which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is 24 MB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Titled as "HUMAN POPULATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BOUNDARIES DATABASE FOR ASIA" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am attaching the South Central Asia E00 file. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That set contains The disputed areas under the country >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name IN1 and IN2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This dataset can not be easily found at present on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GRID Geneva site >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.grid.unep.ch/index.php?lang=en in the same >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may be it is still there somewhere with some other name. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For copyright check the metadata file which is here >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://geonetwork.grid.unep.ch/geonetwork/srv/en/iso19139.xml?id=835 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rgds >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dilip Damle >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 4, 2012 9:52:57 AM UTC+5:30, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karthik Shashidhar wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All the shapefiles for India that I have downloaded do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not show PoK and Aksai Chin as part of India. Does anyone >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here have access >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to shapefiles that include these territories? Basically >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looking to publish >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (online) some maps, so want to make sure that it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accurate. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I looked through the group archives, and all sources >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mentioned there do not show these regions as part of India) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karthik >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> India. Know more about us by visiting http://datameet.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Google Groups "datameet" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Know more about us by visiting http://datameet.org >>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "datameet" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from >>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. >>>>>>>>>>> Know more about us by visiting http://datameet.org >>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic >>>>>>>>>>> in the Google Groups "datameet" group. >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/datameet/X5kzViRMJKs/unsubscribe >>>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email >>>>>>>>>>> to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Democratizing Forest Governance in India >>>>>>>>>>> (In press with Oxford University Press India) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. >>>>>>>>>> Know more about us by visiting http://datameet.org >>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "datameet" group. >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know >>>>>>> more about us by visiting http://datameet.org >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in >>>>>>> the Google Groups "datameet" group. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/datameet/X5kzViRMJKs/unsubscribe. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >>>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know >>>>>>> more about us by visiting http://datameet.org >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in >>>>>>> the Google Groups "datameet" group. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/datameet/X5kzViRMJKs/unsubscribe. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >>>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know >>>>>> more about us by visiting http://datameet.org >>>>>> --- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "datameet" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > -- > Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more > about us by visiting http://datameet.org > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "datameet" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Nisha Thompson DataMeet.org [email protected] skype: nishaqt mobile: 962-061-2245 -- Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more about us by visiting http://datameet.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
