thanks Neha, and Dev - any input on the wiki page will be appreciated. Group, As I had mentioned in my last email / post.. I am trying to build and is currently in alpha stage and is hosted on www.remaze.in - happy to share more information if you send me an email. I tried working on the platform but without relevant base maps its getting tricky to execute.
*| Dipal Thakker* On 4 May 2015 at 18:42, Nisha Thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > @Dev > > Please please please write a blogpost. I'm having a hard time following > myself! It would be a really valuable resource. We can also make teh wiki > a bit more robust.. > > http://datameet.org/wiki/indiangeospatialdata > > Nisha > > On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Dipal Thakker <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello Group, Was very keen to continue this discussion. >> To continue from my last point (in my last msg), the key reason I am >> seeking base-map / boundary data is that I would like to build an >> infographic portal for census and other primary data sets. I gave a shot >> but did not reach too far.. and keen to collaborate with like minded ppl to >> take my project further. >> >> Best, >> Dipal >> >> *| Dipal Thakker* >> >> >> On 19 April 2015 at 15:50, Dipal Thakker <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> @Pradeep thanks for flagging >>> >>> @All - Just bought to my attention that my msg from Thursday last week >>> which was intended for the group was only sent to one member. >>> >>> ---- >>> >>> @Mahroof - thats very true. But the sad part is that BISAG has formal / >>> informal tie-ups with commercial entities (so I have heard) >>> >>> @Sharad - many thanks, will have a look at the information right away. >>> Will this match to Census 2011 data? >>> >>> @Pradeep - many thanks for your offer to help with RTI - ideally i need >>> data for India (which I am sure most of us here are after). But for >>> starters, I am focusing on western region so data for Guj, Raj, Mah, and MP >>> will be great. >>> >>> All - just a thought – It will be great if DM members could collaborate >>> to build an open source data platform, as I am sure there is a lot of data >>> around. >>> >>> --- >>> >>> Which Brings me to my last point.. I am currently trying to build a >>> retail analytics platform and as part of my exercise I am also building a >>> census infographic tool for which I need two key components.. >>> - primary census data which can be extrapolated (thisI have and is now >>> available for free) and >>> - relevant and relateable boundary / admin line data (not available). >>> >>> I have done some very basic work using census raw data layered on OSM >>> using leaflet and driven by PHP / Posgresql >>> >>> Keen to talk with like minded people here.. so please feel free to reach >>> out. >>> >>> KR, >>> Dipal >>> >>> *| Dipal Thakker* >>> >>> >>> >>> On 19 April 2015 at 09:12, Pradeep Bhatt <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Just noticed that you had sent this mail to me and not to the group. >>>> You might want to send it to the group. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Pradeep >>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Dipal Thakker <[email protected] >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> @Mahroof - thats very true. But the sad part is that BISAG has formal >>>>> / informal tie-ups with commercial entities (so I have heard) >>>>> >>>>> @Sharad - many thanks, will have a look at the information right away. >>>>> Will this match to Census 2011 data? >>>>> >>>>> @Pradeep - many thanks for your offer to help with RTI - ideally i >>>>> need data for India (which I am sure most of us here are after). But for >>>>> starters, I am focusing on western region so data for Guj, Raj, Mah, and >>>>> MP >>>>> will be great. >>>>> >>>>> All - just a thought – It will be great if DM members could >>>>> collaborate to build an open source data platform, as I am sure there is a >>>>> lot of data around. >>>>> >>>>> KR, >>>>> Dipal >>>>> >>>>> *| Dipal Thakker* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 14 April 2015 at 12:00, Pradeep Bhatt <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Dipal, >>>>>> >>>>>> I can use RTI to get data from BISAG. >>>>>> >>>>>> Can you let me know you need data exactly for which region? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Pradeep >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Dipal Thakker < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Shashank, Shashank, and DM comrades >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Great if someone can point me to the most complete / recent version >>>>>>> of IND_adm3 data. I am working on a census tool and I have done some >>>>>>> work >>>>>>> for few states, but stuck without detailed boundary data-sets. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I visited BISAG, a nodal agency in Gujarat which I am told has the >>>>>>> most detailed GIS data sets for Gujarat and most parts of India, but was >>>>>>> booted out on my request to access, lease, license, or rent data set.. >>>>>>> its >>>>>>> such a shame that on one hand PM/govt is talking about open data and on >>>>>>> other there is a thick bureaucratic red tape. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *| Dipal Thakker* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 14 April 2015 at 10:41, "Sharad Lele [शरच्चंद्र लेले]" < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dear Shashank: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think the bottom line of the thread below was the the IND_adm3 >>>>>>>> layer is a reasonably good layer for tehsil boundaries. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regarding digitizing village boundaries: seems like we are all >>>>>>>> condemned to reinvent the wheel because GoI/Planning Commission/ISRO >>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>> not willing to share what they have already done (and in many cases 10 >>>>>>>> times over). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For which state are you trying to create a village boundary layer? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sharad >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 14-Apr-15 10:33 AM, Shashank wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bumping this up, because I don't think this issue has been resolved >>>>>>>> yet. I now have 4 different versions of Indian administrative >>>>>>>> boundaries, >>>>>>>> and my current nightmare is getting protected area boundaries to line >>>>>>>> up >>>>>>>> with them accurately. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What's the best *open* version of Indian administrative >>>>>>>> boundaries, down to the Tehsil/Block level, and is there a place from >>>>>>>> where >>>>>>>> it is easily available? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (I'm not even going to ask for village-level data, because among >>>>>>>> other things, what we're doing now is digitising revenue village maps >>>>>>>> because the MRD itself doesn't have digitised village level >>>>>>>> data...yet.) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 2:02:37 PM UTC+5:30, D Thakker >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Eric, in my research / experience i have found that Sub-district, >>>>>>>>> Mandal, Taluka, Tehsil means same and are division of District when it >>>>>>>>> comes to Census. >>>>>>>>> But for Revenue dept boundaries are drawn and managed by district >>>>>>>>> administrative bodies who report to state administration only. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So for census - District and Sub-district are well defined >>>>>>>>> boundaries, and I understand from 2011 Census India has bought a >>>>>>>>> started >>>>>>>>> numbering system which should make future data reconciliation easier >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But for land revenue depaetment - it really depends on the local >>>>>>>>> administrative reach and function, and is managed and controlled by >>>>>>>>> state >>>>>>>>> admin bodies. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For eg. Surat has some discrepancy when it comes to Revenue and >>>>>>>>> Census boundaries. This was something I came across and even local >>>>>>>>> admin >>>>>>>>> bodies in Surat were not aware >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thursday, August 7, 2014 at 8:15:45 PM UTC+5:30, Eric Dodge >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This is very interesting Sharad. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I've been looking for maps of what I've been calling >>>>>>>>>> administrative blocks, that is, the units overseen by block >>>>>>>>>> development >>>>>>>>>> officers. MGNREGA data is aggregated at this level and I've been >>>>>>>>>> hoping to >>>>>>>>>> use the data to do some mapping exercises. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The census sub-districts are called differently across states >>>>>>>>>> (tahsil, taluk, mandal, etc). You can see the list here: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://censusindia.gov.in/Tables_Published/Admin_Units/Admin_links/subdistrict_nomeclature.html >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I know that in all the states where census sub-districts are >>>>>>>>>> called taluk, mandal, or CD block (with the exception of TN), the >>>>>>>>>> census >>>>>>>>>> sub-district is identical to the administrative block. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I've already completed a mapping exercise for Bihar using the >>>>>>>>>> census sub-district map and the data matched up pretty well. If the >>>>>>>>>> IND_adm3 data is indeed the administrative blocks then I could do a >>>>>>>>>> similar >>>>>>>>>> exercise with Madhya Pradesh. I'll take a look to see if the data >>>>>>>>>> lines up >>>>>>>>>> correctly. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Has anybody dug into this issue any deeper? I've heard that >>>>>>>>>> tehsil comes from the revenue side whereas taluk, mandal, etc comes >>>>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>>> the administrative side but that doesn't explain why the census uses >>>>>>>>>> different sub-district units across states. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>> Eric >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Sharad Lele <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If I am right, then Justin may want to rename his layer as >>>>>>>>>>> CDBlocks_2001... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Sharad >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, August 7, 2014 4:28:17 PM UTC+5:30, Sharad Lele >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I think I have the explanation for why I am seeing a good >>>>>>>>>>>> match and you are not: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The problem lies in defining what is the 'sub-district' unit >>>>>>>>>>>> (in IND_adm3). Administratively speaking, it is tehsil, below >>>>>>>>>>>> which lies CD >>>>>>>>>>>> block. Unfortunately, census gives information by CD block. So >>>>>>>>>>>> there are >>>>>>>>>>>> more 'sub-district' units in Census than tehsils in the country. >>>>>>>>>>>> GDAM seems >>>>>>>>>>>> to have followed the tehsil concept. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> To check: Karnataka is one state in which tehsil and CD block >>>>>>>>>>>> are one and the same. That is why the sub-district layer IND_adm3 >>>>>>>>>>>> matches >>>>>>>>>>>> perfectly for Karnataka, but not for other states. There might be >>>>>>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>>> other states where this holds good, I don't know. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, so if one really wants CD block level boundaries, we >>>>>>>>>>>> have to look at Justin, I guess. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> But the GDAM boundaries are not 'wrong'. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sharad >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 07-Aug-14 9:48 AM, Devdatta Tengshe wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> In Continuation of my previous email, here is a CSV file >>>>>>>>>>>> which shows just how bad the GDAM dataset is. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> Devdatta >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Devdatta Tengshe < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Sharad, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I just download the GDAM data again, to confirm what you have >>>>>>>>>>>>> said. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to have to disagree with you about the quality of >>>>>>>>>>>>> the IND_adm3 data. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Acoording to the 2001 Census, there are 5454 Sub Districts in >>>>>>>>>>>>> India <http://www.socialjustice.nic.in/pdf/tab11.pdf>. The >>>>>>>>>>>>> GDAM dataset has just 2299 features. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So clearly these taluk features do not correspond to the 2001 >>>>>>>>>>>>> Census. I cross checked for some areas I have ground knowledge >>>>>>>>>>>>> of, and I >>>>>>>>>>>>> can say that this dataset is not from any specific era. Some >>>>>>>>>>>>> tehsils in the >>>>>>>>>>>>> file were created post 2001, while others created in the 90's >>>>>>>>>>>>> were not >>>>>>>>>>>>> present. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In my opinion the GDAM data is pretty much unusable. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Devdatta >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Sharad Lele < >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have downloaded and checked the GADM boundaries (my version >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is 2011). The taluka boundary layer probably holds good today, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> becuase few >>>>>>>>>>>>>> talukas get split. Districts get split regularly (every so many >>>>>>>>>>>>>> years) so >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the district boundary layer in this GADM set is quite of date >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (may apply to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2001 or so). The spatial registration (positional accuracy is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ~1km, and the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> spatial detail is of course not as good as the boundaries given >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in a Survey >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of India 50k topo, but then that is an unfair standard, so by a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> more >>>>>>>>>>>>>> generalized standard, the quality is okay. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sharad >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, August 4, 2014 7:20:38 PM UTC+5:30, Dilip Damle >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mr Thakkar, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please also look at another post (more than one) on this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group about Taluk Shapefiles by Justin Meyers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So far as I know GADM is the source that has Taluk files. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am not sure about its completeness and accuracy as on today >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.gadm.org/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, August 4, 2014 6:23:07 PM UTC+5:30, D Thakker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks Dilip for your hardwork. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have been on a lookout for all taluka / tehsil shape >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file, so how do I be in a loop as I am very keen to see the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository mail >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> / list. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, August 4, 2014 9:50:26 AM UTC+5:30, Dilip Damle >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sharad, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am working on some things will revert in about a week or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may be more. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thejesh, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Go ahead, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually there was one more source a Low Resolution >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (vertices) District map by VDS technologies. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have it as Polylines in Autocad. I seem to have lost the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> original file. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If anyone has then please share it. (it does not seem to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be on their site now) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, August 3, 2014 11:32:43 PM UTC+5:30, Thejesh GN >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually its not a bad idea to list it on the wiki. Let >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me know i will create an account. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thejesh GN ⏚ ತೇಜೇಶ್ ಜಿ.ಎನ್ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://thejeshgn.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GPG ID : 0xBFFC8DD3C06DD6B0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 3, 2014 10:15 PM, "Sharad Lele" < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Dilip and others: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have been following this thread with interest, but to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be honest am a bit lost now. Can someone post a summary of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which maps >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mentioned so far have what features (which coverage, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pertaining to which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> year, what attributes (such as census codes), etc.)? Would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be most helpful. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sharad >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, August 1, 2014 9:03:58 PM UTC+5:30, Dilip >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Damle wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is an old post. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However this is the appropriate place to add an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> additional source. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I had downloaded the set from Grid Geneva many years >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The original complete source was named as GNV197 which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is 24 MB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Titled as "HUMAN POPULATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BOUNDARIES DATABASE FOR ASIA" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am attaching the South Central Asia E00 file. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That set contains The disputed areas under the country >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name IN1 and IN2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This dataset can not be easily found at present on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GRID Geneva site >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.grid.unep.ch/index.php?lang=en in the same >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may be it is still there somewhere with some other name. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For copyright check the metadata file which is here >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://geonetwork.grid.unep.ch/geonetwork/srv/en/iso19139.xml?id=835 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rgds >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dilip Damle >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 4, 2012 9:52:57 AM UTC+5:30, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karthik Shashidhar wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All the shapefiles for India that I have downloaded do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not show PoK and Aksai Chin as part of India. Does anyone >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here have access >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to shapefiles that include these territories? Basically >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looking to publish >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (online) some maps, so want to make sure that it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accurate. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I looked through the group archives, and all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sources mentioned there do not show these regions as part >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of India) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karthik >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> India. Know more about us by visiting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://datameet.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Google Groups "datameet" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send an email to [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Know more about us by visiting http://datameet.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "datameet" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. >>>>>>>>>>>> Know more about us by visiting http://datameet.org >>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic >>>>>>>>>>>> in the Google Groups "datameet" group. >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/datameet/X5kzViRMJKs/unsubscribe >>>>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an >>>>>>>>>>>> email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Democratizing Forest Governance in India >>>>>>>>>>>> (In press with Oxford University Press India) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. >>>>>>>>>>> Know more about us by visiting http://datameet.org >>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "datameet" group. >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from >>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know >>>>>>>> more about us by visiting http://datameet.org >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in >>>>>>>> the Google Groups "datameet" group. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/datameet/X5kzViRMJKs/unsubscribe. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >>>>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know >>>>>>>> more about us by visiting http://datameet.org >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in >>>>>>>> the Google Groups "datameet" group. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/datameet/X5kzViRMJKs/unsubscribe. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >>>>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know >>>>>>> more about us by visiting http://datameet.org >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "datameet" group. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> -- >> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more >> about us by visiting http://datameet.org >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "datameet" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > > > -- > Nisha Thompson > DataMeet.org > [email protected] > skype: nishaqt > mobile: 962-061-2245 > > -- > Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more > about us by visiting http://datameet.org > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "datameet" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/datameet/X5kzViRMJKs/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more about us by visiting http://datameet.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
