Hello all, Nice enlightening discussion with a little sparks,
A small thumbnail photo of the member may help reduce sparks because then you create an image of that person in your mind based on the photo. BTW my photo here is about 40 years outdated now I look more ferocious :) Any way to add to the confusion there is also the Division So it seems to be Country > State > Division > District > Tehsil / Taluk > Some Kind of Block > Village Let us first get this ans confirm if each is subset of the other or there are overlaps and if there is any other item missing in between then let us proceed On Thursday, August 7, 2014 10:32:08 PM UTC+5:30, Justin Meyers wrote: > > Sharad, > Sorry about my tone; I get excited/ pushy when it comes to geospatial > data. In my experience, you have to ask, ask again, and keep asking (like > I did with you until you finally responded). I guess I should only ask > once, and if you don't respond, then you never will... > > In my honest opinion, GADM is junk. If you want me to explain the top ten > reasons why, I can. > > As per you sharing your data; if you can share it, it would be great. > Digitized one off data is unique, and could be better than what is on this > forum. If you or your company paid for the data, and cannot share, it > makes sense. I figure since you are here, looking for free data (or > whatever), asking questions about it, and have data, why not share what you > have. > > Just my 2 cents. Sorry for coming off as a jerk. I apologize. > > Justin > > On Thursday, August 7, 2014 12:51:39 PM UTC-4, Sharad Lele wrote: >> >> On 07-Aug-14 8:18 PM, Justin Meyers wrote: >> > As per our conversation yesterday, could you upload your data? You >> > keep criticizing everyone else's data, but you don't share your own!?? >> > Help me help you :) >> Dear Justin: >> >> I think you are going too far and too fast. A more moderate tone would >> be appreciated. >> >> 1. I never criticized anyone: in fact, i said GDAM was ok, and you were >> the one who used fairly strong words against it. >> 2. I have only clarified out that your layer reflects CD block >> boundaries while GDAM reflects tehsil boundaries. Both may be 'ok' in >> what they represent. >> 3. The only reason I have not shared any data of mine is simply because >> I have only two datasets: the GDAM one (which is both already available >> and being criticised by some ;-)) and a dataset of admin boundaries >> (district and tehsil) for Karnataka state alone which we paid for and >> got digitized from District Census Handbooks of 1991. When I check GDAM >> or your layer versus this layer, I see no major differences. So then >> what is the point in uploading that data? >> >> Sharad >> >> >> -- >> Democratizing Forest Governance in India >> (In press with Oxford University Press India) >> >> -- Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more about us by visiting http://datameet.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
