On Thursday 29 January 2009, Kevin Hilman wrote: > The right thing to do is probably name the sysclks pllX_sysclkY > instead of simply sysclkY. Does that seem OK?
That's better than doing it via comments, like my dm355 tweaks; yes, seems ok. Worth doing everywhere, not just for dm365. Another suggestion: have clock nodes for all the PLL taps, instead of eliding the divide-by-one taps and the ones that only feed one module. For consistency and clarity. - Dave _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
