debian-arm  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: abi-compliance-checker and library transitions [Re: another attempt at Y2038] Steve Langasek
  • Re: abi-compliance-checker and library transitions [Re: another attempt at Y2038] Steve Langasek
  • Re: another attempt at Y2038 Aurelien Jarno
• Looking for testers for Quartz64 patch for Debian kernel Diederik de Haas
  • Re: Looking for testers for Quartz64 patch for Debian kernel Diederik de Haas
  • Re: Looking for testers for Quartz64 patch for Debian kernel Diederik de Haas
• Bug#1021810: Should firefox-esr be dropped on 32bit architectures in bookworm? Adrian Bunk
• odd difference between two similar armhf build servers Jérémy Lal
  • Re: odd difference between two similar armhf build servers Arnd Bergmann
• Any suggestions for a Debian(based/like) OS for the Orange Pi zero2 Rick Thomas
  • Re: Any suggestions for a Debian(based/like) OS for the Orange Pi zero2 Andrew M.A. Cater
  • Re: Any suggestions for a Debian(based/like) OS for the Orange Pi zero2 Rick Thomas
  • Re: Any suggestions for a Debian(based/like) OS for the Orange Pi zero2 RobJE
  • Re: Any suggestions for a Debian(based/like) OS for the Orange Pi zero2 Rick Thomas
  • Re: Any suggestions for a Debian(based/like) OS for the Orange Pi zero2 Paul Wise
  • Re: Any suggestions for a Debian(based/like) OS for the Orange Pi zero2 Marcin Juszkiewicz
• Graphics acceleration for Apple's M1 ARM GPU FritzS GMX
  • Re: Graphics acceleration for Apple's M1 ARM GPU Paul Wise
• On ARM64 Bit. A Qualcomm Chip. Dan Zulla
  • Re: On ARM64 Bit. A Qualcomm Chip. Gunnar Wolf
• [Y2038] debian/armhf time64 build? Dominique MARTINET
  • Re: [Y2038] debian/armhf time64 build? Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: [Y2038] debian/armhf time64 build? Dominique MARTINET
  • Re: [Y2038] debian/armhf time64 build? Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: [Y2038] debian/armhf time64 build? Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: [Y2038] debian/armhf time64 build? Wookey
  • Re: [Y2038] debian/armhf time64 build? Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: [Y2038] debian/armhf time64 build? Wookey
  • Re: [Y2038] debian/armhf time64 build? Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: [Y2038] debian/armhf time64 build? Wookey
  • Re: [Y2038] debian/armhf time64 build? Wookey
  • Re: [Y2038] debian/armhf time64 build? Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: [Y2038] debian/armhf time64 build? Wookey
  • Re: [Y2038] debian/armhf time64 build? Adrian Bunk
  • Re: [Y2038] debian/armhf time64 build? Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: [Y2038] debian/armhf time64 build? Adrian Bunk
  • Re: [Y2038] debian/armhf time64 build? Wookey
• abel.d.o + gcc-12.x Mathieu Malaterre
  • Re: abel.d.o + gcc-12.x John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
  • Re: abel.d.o + gcc-12.x Mathieu Malaterre
  • Re: abel.d.o + gcc-12.x Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: abel.d.o + gcc-12.x Wookey
• Bug#1018076: transition: gjs and gnome-shell likely to be removed from armel Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1018076: mini-transition: gjs built against mozjs102 Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1018076: mini-transition: gjs built against mozjs102 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• Bug#1017979: mozjs91: FTBFS on armel with gcc 12: multiple definition of `__sync_fetch_and_add_4' etc. Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1017979: mozjs91: FTBFS on armel with gcc 12: multiple definition of `__sync_fetch_and_add_4' etc. Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1017979: mozjs91: FTBFS on armel with gcc 12: multiple definition of `__sync_fetch_and_add_4' etc. Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: Bug#1017979: mozjs91: FTBFS on armel with gcc 12: multiple definition of `__sync_fetch_and_add_4' etc. Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1017979: mozjs91: FTBFS on armel with gcc 12: multiple definition of `__sync_fetch_and_add_4' etc. Simon McVittie
• Bug#1017961: mozjs102: Fails to build on armel Jeremy Bicha
  • Re: Bug#1017961: mozjs102: Fails to build on armel Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1017961: mozjs102: Fails to build on armel Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1017961: mozjs102: Fails to build on armel Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1017961: mozjs102: Fails to build on armel Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1017961: mozjs102: Fails to build on armel Wookey
  • Re: Bug#1017961: mozjs102: Fails to build on armel Jérémy Lal
• Bug#1017962: mozjs102: Fails to build on armhf Jeremy Bicha
  • Re: Bug#1017962: mozjs102: Fails to build on armhf Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1017962: mozjs102: Fails to build on armhf Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1017962: mozjs102: Fails to build on armhf Simon McVittie
• Bug#1017537: dietlibc: FTBFS on armel Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: Bug#1017537: dietlibc: FTBFS on armel Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: Bug#1017537: dietlibc: FTBFS on armel Thorsten Glaser
  • armel buildd misconfiguration (was Re: Bug#1017537: dietlibc: FTBFS on armel) Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: armel buildd misconfiguration (was Re: Bug#1017537: dietlibc: FTBFS on armel) Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: Bug#1017537: armel buildd misconfiguration Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: Bug#1017537: armel buildd misconfiguration Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: Bug#1017537: armel buildd misconfiguration Thorsten Glaser
• Re: Bug#1017538: dietlibc: FTBFS on armhf: selected processor does not support vldm in ARM mode Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: Bug#1017538: dietlibc: FTBFS on armhf: selected processor does not support vldm in ARM mode Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: Bug#1017538: dietlibc: FTBFS on armhf: selected processor does not support vldm in ARM mode Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: Bug#1017538: dietlibc: FTBFS on armhf: selected processor does not support vldm in ARM mode Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: Bug#1017538: dietlibc: FTBFS on armhf: selected processor does not support vldm in ARM mode Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: Bug#1017538: dietlibc: FTBFS on armhf: selected processor does not support vldm in ARM mode Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: Bug#1017538: dietlibc: FTBFS on armhf: selected processor does not support vldm in ARM mode Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: Bug#1017538: dietlibc: FTBFS on armhf: selected processor does not support vldm in ARM mode Sebastian Ramacher
• Debian Gnome versus Debian Cinnamon on UTM - M1 Mac FritzS GMX
  • Re: Debian Gnome versus Debian Cinnamon on UTM - M1 Mac Wookey
  • Re: Debian Gnome versus Debian Cinnamon on UTM - M1 Mac FritzS GMX
  • Re: Debian Gnome versus Debian Cinnamon on UTM - M1 Mac Hank Barta
  • Re: Debian Gnome versus Debian Cinnamon on UTM - M1 Mac Keith Bainbridge
• OffTopic - Default language FritzS GMX
  • Re: OffTopic - Default language Luna Jernberg
  • Re: OffTopic - Default language Paul Wise
• Long shot: debug board for Efika Smartbook David Boddie
  • Re: Long shot: debug board for Efika Smartbook Gérald Kerma
  • Re: Long shot: debug board for Efika Smartbook David Boddie
• RFH: porting bolt-lmm Nilesh Patra
  • Re: RFH: porting bolt-lmm Paul Wise
  • Re: RFH: porting bolt-lmm Nilesh Patra
• Red PWR LED is always on / not detected by the system raspberry_debian
  • Re: Red PWR LED is always on / not detected by the system Paul Wise
• Re: insecure W+X mapping Diederik de Haas
• 40kB individual object size increase in util-linux on arm* Chris Hofstaedtler
• vldm on armhf? Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: vldm on armhf? Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: vldm on armhf? Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: vldm on armhf? Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: vldm on armhf? Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: vldm on armhf? Thorsten Glaser
• failure trying to install bullseye on Cubox-i Rick Thomas
  • Re: failure trying to install bullseye on Cubox-i Rick Thomas
  • Re: failure trying to install bullseye on Cubox-i Rick Thomas
  • Re: failure trying to install bullseye on Cubox-i Vagrant Cascadian
• [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups for multiword loads Ard Biesheuvel
  • Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups for multiword loads Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups for multiword loads gene heskett
  • Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups for multiword loads Wookey
  • Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups for multiword loads LinAdmin
  • Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups formultiword loads gene heskett
  • Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups formultiword loads Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups formultiword loads Paul Wise
  • Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups formultiword loads Arnd Bergmann
  • armhf kernels on arm64 hardware Wookey
  • Re: armhf kernels on arm64 hardware gene heskett
  • Re: armhf kernels on arm64 hardware Wookey
  • Re: armhf kernels on arm64 hardware Vagrant Cascadian
  • latency test results for armhf vs arm64? Paul Wise
  • Re: latency test results for armhf vs arm64? gene heskett
  • Re: latency test results for armhf vs arm64? Paul Wise
  • Re: latency test results for armhf vs arm64? gene heskett
  • Re: latency test results for armhf vs arm64? Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: latency test results for armhf vs arm64? gene heskett
  • Re: latency test results for armhf vs arm64? Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: latency test results for armhf vs arm64? gene heskett
  • Re: latency test results for armhf vs arm64? Matthias Klein
  • Re: latency test results for armhf vs arm64? Lennart Sorensen
  • Re: latency test results for armhf vs arm64? gene heskett
  • Re: latency test results for armhf vs arm64? Lennart Sorensen
  • Re: latency test results for armhf vs arm64? Diederik de Haas
  • Re: latency test results for armhf vs arm64? Lennart Sorensen
  • Re: armhf kernels on arm64 hardware Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: armhf kernels on arm64 hardware Lennart Sorensen
  • Re: armhf kernels on arm64 hardware Lennart Sorensen
  • Re: armhf kernels on arm64 hardware Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups formultiword loads LinAdmin
  • Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups formultiword loads Tobias Frost
  • Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups formultiword loads LinAdmin
  • Debian abandoning armhf, Raspberry Pi OS - was Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups formultiword loads Andrew M.A. Cater
  • Re: Debian abandoning armhf, Raspberry Pi OS - was Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups formultiword loads Alan Corey
  • Re: Debian abandoning armhf, Raspberry Pi OS - was Re: [PATCH v2] arm64:compat: Implement misalignment fixups formultiword loads gene heskett
  • Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups for multiword loads Aurelien Jarno
  • Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups for multiword loads Ard Biesheuvel
  • Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups for multiword loads Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups for multiword loads LinAdmin
  • Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups for multiword loads Andrew M.A. Cater
  • Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups for multiword loads LinAdmin
  • Clarification [WAS Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups for multiword loads] Andrew M.A. Cater
  • Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups for multiword loads Catalin Marinas
  • Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups for multiword loads Ard Biesheuvel
  • Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups for multiword loads Catalin Marinas
  • Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups for multiword loads Catalin Marinas
• armhf: abel.d.o hardware status ? Mathieu Malaterre
  • Re: armhf: abel.d.o hardware status ? Wookey
  • Re: armhf: abel.d.o hardware status ? Mathieu Malaterre
  • Re: armhf: abel.d.o hardware status ? Wookey
  • Re: armhf: abel.d.o hardware status ? Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: armhf: abel.d.o hardware status ? Mathieu Malaterre
  • Re: armhf: abel.d.o hardware status ? Mathieu Malaterre
  • Re: armhf: abel.d.o hardware status ? Lennart Sorensen
  • Re: armhf: abel.d.o hardware status ? Mathieu Malaterre
• Re: [RFC PATCH] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups for multiword loads Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups for multiword loads Ard Biesheuvel
• Using a serial port Steve Fatula
  • Re: Using a serial port Lennart Sorensen
  • Re: Using a serial port Steve Fatula
  • Re: Using a serial port Francois Lorrain
  • Re: Using a serial port Andrew M.A. Cater
  • Re: Using a serial port Lennart Sorensen
  • Re: Using a serial port Paul Wise
  • Re: Using a serial port gene heskett
• enabling link time optimizations in package builds Matthias Klose
  • Re: enabling link time optimizations in package builds Timo Röhling
• Re: SheevaPlug -- first phase results successful. Rick Thomas
  • Re: SheevaPlug -- first phase results successful. Martin Michlmayr
• Bug#1012347: arm64 CPU Phytium FT-2000/4 cpuinfo 肖盛文） <[email protected]>
  • Re: Bug#1012347: arm64 CPU Phytium FT-2000/4 cpuinfo 肖盛文
  • Re: Bug#1012347: arm64 CPU Phytium FT-2000/4 cpuinfo 肖盛文
  • Re: Bug#1012347: arm64 CPU Phytium FT-2000/4 cpuinfo Punit Agrawal
  • Re: Bug#1012347: arm64 CPU Phytium FT-2000/4 cpuinfo Helge Kreutzmann
  • Re: Bug#1012347: arm64 CPU Phytium FT-2000/4 cpuinfo Punit Agrawal
  • Re: Bug#1012347: arm64 CPU Phytium FT-2000/4 cpuinfo Helge Kreutzmann
• Debian 11 on Sheevaplug? Gilles
  • Re: Debian 11 on Sheevaplug? Rick Thomas
  • Re: Debian 11 on Sheevaplug? Paul Wise
  • Re: Debian 11 on Sheevaplug? Gandalf
  • Re: Debian 11 on Sheevaplug? Martin Michlmayr
  • Re: Debian 11 on Sheevaplug? Gilles
  • Re: Debian 11 on Sheevaplug? Rick Thomas
  • Re: Debian 11 on Sheevaplug? Gilles
  • Re: Debian 11 on Sheevaplug? Philip Hands
  • Re: Debian 11 on Sheevaplug? Gilles
  • Re: Debian 11 on Sheevaplug? Gilles
  • Re: Debian 11 on Sheevaplug? Rick Thomas
  • Re: Debian 11 on Sheevaplug? Martin Michlmayr
  • Re: Debian 11 on Sheevaplug? Gilles
  • Debian 11 on Sheevaplug? Jim MacKenzie
• Debian Bullseye 64-bit for the Khadas VIM4 Larry Dighera
  • Re: Debian Bullseye 64-bit for the Khadas VIM4 Paul Wise

• Earlier messages
• Later messages