Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 02.12.03 21:51:20: > > I've been contacted by a member of the NetBSD team, who expressed that the > general opinion seems to be that "Debian GNU/KNetBSD" is a better name for > the port than "Debian GNU/NetBSD", both because it is more specific about
If the NetBSD people are concerned about that, why should we not help them? Michael > what's going on, and because it doesn't dilute the NetBSD trademark. While > the former is less true of, say, my work, the latter is certainly a valid > concern. > > Of course, this leads to the question of naming things for the ports > that use native libc rather than GNU libc. > > KLNetBSD (Kernel + Libc)? > KCNetBSD (Kernel + libC, Kernel + Core)? > CNetBSD (Core)? > > Debian GNU/MostlyNetBSD? NotQuiteNetBSD? :) > > But seriously - since it is not unreasonable to view "NetBSD" as not only > /usr/src, but /usr/pkgsrc and the bug system and everything the project > does, is there some meaningful way of representing what pieces we *are* > using, for those of us using the kernel and libc? > -- > Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ,''`. > Debian GNU NetBSD/i386 porter : :' : > `. `' > `- > ______________________________________________________________________________ Horoskop, Comics, VIPs, Wetter, Sport und Lotto im WEB.DE Screensaver1.2 Kostenlos downloaden: http://screensaver.web.de/?mc=021110