On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 10:49:42PM +0100, Michael Ritzert wrote: > Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 02.12.03 21:51:20: > > > > I've been contacted by a member of the NetBSD team, who expressed that the > > general opinion seems to be that "Debian GNU/KNetBSD" is a better name for > > the port than "Debian GNU/NetBSD", both because it is more specific about > > If the NetBSD people are concerned about that, why should we not help them?
My impression is that 'concerned' might be a bit of an overstatement. It
seems more like someone saw 'GNU/KNetBSD', and said "Hey, that actually
seems like it might be a better way to describe it". However, since I don't
want to cause drastic confusion or simply co-opt the name Robert has been
using (and since, as noted in the origional message, it's not quite as
accurate for the work others are doing), I wanted to raise the issue to the
Debian BSD list at large.
--
Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ,''`.
Debian GNU NetBSD/i386 porter : :' :
`. `'
`-
pgpDUYppURsDR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
