On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 11:49:45 +0000 Ian Jackson <[email protected]> wrote: > Ian Jackson writes ("Bug#746578: libpam-systemd to flip dependencies - > proposal"): > > So, I hereby formally propose the resolution text below. I intend to > > call for votes some time tomorrow. > > Thanks again to Josh for all his careful and constructive > interventions in the discussion. I'm glad to see that he's now happy > with this proposal.
This proposal doesn't seem to include the change you made in git commit 227f496617929c48bfd20a9c96eead8b91ee69b7 to fix a typo I reported in item 4: > 4. In particular, on systems that already have systemd-sysv installed, > libpam-systemd will still not pull in systemd-shim, thus minimizing > the risk of breakage on systemd systems. However, on systems that > intentionally do not have systemd installed, the installation of > libpam-systemd will then prefer to pull in systemd-shim and keep > the installed init system rather than switching to systemd-sysv. In your mail with Message-ID <[email protected]>, you said: >Josh Triplett writes ("Bug#746578: libpam-systemd to flip dependencies - >proposal"): [...] >> s/intentionally do not have systemd/intentionally do not have systemd-sysv/ > >Fixed in git. I hereby make that change to my formal proposal. - Josh Triplett -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141105155158.GA13254@thin
