* Matthias Klumpp (matth...@tenstral.net) [141112 13:21]: > 2014-11-12 12:28 GMT+01:00 Andreas Barth <a...@ayous.org>: > > * Ian Jackson (ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk) [141105 17:39]: > >> I am calling for votes on the text below: > >> Y (override, swap dependencies, requires >>3:1) > >> FD > > > > I vote Y, FD (with the remark that Y doesn't make a decision on "does > > debian want to change the default on upgrades" but just > > "libpam-systemd dependencies is not the appropriate mechanismn to do > > it" > For this I want to highlight that the systemd maintainers also > consider this a bad idea [...]
> So the decision to swap the dependencies would only be to ensure that > - if there is a broken dependency solver - systemd-sysv is never > accidentially installed (and sysvinit replaced). And that's exactly what this decision means, don't swap the init system by accident. Nothing more but also nothing less. (I had a bit of bad experience of people reading more in an statement than there was in, that is why I wrote that. And I also fear that "also the systemd maintainers consider this a bad idea" doesn't help too much in avoiding that, at least at the moment.) Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141112122813.gf25...@mails.so.argh.org
