Adrian Bunk <> writes:

> Why are TC members complaining that they do not even properly understand 
> what "browserified" means, instead of using the power to give advice to 
> structure the discussion?

Probably because without a response to #830986, "browserified" either
means including Jison output into things, or it cannot possibly cover
what's being done to libjs-handlebars, either of which makes the recent
bugs against tech-ctte and ftp-master just a little astonishing.

Praveen, please respond to #830986

Without such a response, I wasn't even sure if the re-opening of the bug
was instead an attempt to get some sort of permission to let the likes
of gitlab into main, by temporarily ignoring the non-free
dependencies. (I'm not suggesting that as a way forward BTW, but it
seemed at least as plausible as what was actually being asked)

Cheers, Phil.
|)|  Philip Hands  [+44 (0)20 8530 9560]  HANDS.COM Ltd.
|(|  Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34,   21075 Hamburg,    GERMANY

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to