On Sun, Nov 08, 2026 at 08:42:24AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > Sean Whitton <[email protected]> writes: > > > I'm not sure it is sustainable to hold such a central role in the > > project as the DFSG delegates do, and not engage with our primary > > means of communication. At the same time, I don't feel free to say > > that all delegates *must* be on debian-devel or something like that. > > > > Maybe we need to set some expectations here -- that all delegates need > > to make it clear the venue in which they'd like to receive feedback > > (in this case, it seems to be salsa issues). > > I'm certainly in favour of this.
+1 > When accepting a Project delegation > role, I think we should expect communication channel to that delegate is > well-known and easily discoverable, and routinely honoured by the > delegate. > > My preference would be for such communication channel to be a > Debian-infrastructure mailing list, chosen by the *team* (not > individually) and advertised as such in an obvious location for all > teams (maybe the Debian website, or wiki, or the like). > > A person, even one who is unfamiliar with Debian's conventions and > quirks, who needs to communicate with the delegate team, should not need > to hunt aimlessly for how to do that, it should IMO be part of team > delegation that such communication is straightforwardly discoverable by > any such person. Regards Geert Stappers Missing the DFSG delegates in this thread -- Silence is hard to parse
