At the risk of apearing to be knit-picking, I ask (1) How much mempry do you consider as a lot ... from what I can remember 16Mb was sufficient to do away with the swap file (probably except if you are runnig X ..)
(2) would a seperate drive be faster than a swap file on the same disk? ... This has been a long standing issue between a friend and I Jon. On Wed, 18 Feb 1998, Ralph Winslow wrote: > > Is that absolutely neccessary ... one for swap?? > > A separate drive certainly isn't (though it wiould improve performance) > but unless you have a lot of memory, a swap partition is EXTREMELY -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .