On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 01:37:05PM -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > tomas composed on 2024-01-14 19:15 (UTC+0100):
[Gene] > >> > I have not been able to use that last line as a target for rsync > > >> That's not unexpected. /mnt/ is intended for /temporary/ or /transient/ > >> mounting, > >> while /etc/fstab is OTOH intended for routine. > > > How should the mount point have an influence on transfer rates? > > AFAIK, nothing I wrote would be expected to have any relationship to transfer > rates. My point was entirely about suitability of /mnt/ for fstab entries. Oh, I understand. And I do agree that it isn't generally a good idea to put /mnt in fstab -- unless you know well what you're doing. Cheers -- t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
