On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 8:32:12 AM UTC-7, 谭晓生 wrote:
> Dear Gerv and all,
> 
> Qihoo 360 is a company valued at USD$9.99B as it finished the privatization 
> on July 15th 2016, we have invested in more than 200 companies across the 
> world, Wosign is just a very small one and we even do not have any people 
> sent to this company after the investment, the major businesses of Qihoo 360 
> are security software for consumer, we are the largest player of anti-virus 
> software in China, No.2 search engine in China and one of the top gaming 
> platform in China, No.1 PC browser in China, the total revenue is about 
> USD$1.6B last year, that’s might help to understand that why the layers don’t 
> think Wosign is a "significant subsidiary".

During the due diligence process were you aware that WoSign was under an 
obligation to inform Mozilla about any change of control or ownership?

Were you aware that WoSign had completed an acquisition of a CA and not 
informed Mozilla of the change of control then?

Sincerely,
Watson Ladd

>  
> Thanks,
> Xiaosheng
>  
> Xiaosheng Tan, Chief Security Officer
> Qihoo 360
> E-Mail: tanxiaosh...@360.cn
> Web: www.360.cn <http://www.360.cn/>
> Address: Bldg 2, 6 Haoyuan, Jiuxianqiao Rd, Chaoyang Dist, Beijing, China 
> 100015
>  
> 
> 在 16/9/20 下午5:30,“Gervase Markham”<g...@mozilla.org> 写入:
> 
>     Hello Xiaosheng,
>     
>     Welcome to our discussion forum :-) It may help you to know that
>     participants in this forum come from a wide range of backgrounds and
>     companies, and the only ones who represent Mozilla are the ones listed 
> here:
>     http://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:Policy_Participants
>     as doing so.
>     
>     On 20/09/16 08:23, 谭晓生 wrote:
>     > I’m Xiaosheng Tan, the Chief Security Officer of Qihoo 360, on the
>     > inquiry of the disclosure of Wosign deal, we are not obligated to
>     > disclose it under the SEC regulation, here is the reply from our
>     > internal lawyers:
>     
>     To be totally clear: Mozilla is not suggesting that StartCom, WoSign or
>     Qihoo 360 have done anything illegal. The questions we are asking about
>     disclosure relate to Mozilla's policies on the topic (and perhaps to the
>     CAB Forum voting rules), not to the SEC rules.
>     
>     Having said that, if the company structure is as we understand it to be,
>     I am very surprised that your lawyers do not think that WoSign is a
>     "significant subsidiary" of Qihoo 360 under SEC rules. But that is a
>     matter for you and the SEC, not for us :-)
>     
>     Gerv

_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy

Reply via email to