I am OK with committers ONLY using GH issues on all repos (with clear
guidance as to what the heck the project is doing) or doing a
full-switch on the other repos.
On 2/14/18 7:00 PM, Mike Miller wrote:
We could do a trial period of GitHub issues for the accumulo sub-repos
(accumulo-website, accumulo-examples...) then after a month or two decide
to switch or not. That way we won't have duplicate issues or the confusion
of having 2 trackers for one repository.
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 6:12 PM, Mike Walch <mwa...@apache.org> wrote:
+1 I think it makes sense to try out GitHub before shutting off JIRA. This
period could be limited to a month or two.
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 5:59 PM, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote:
What if we had an interim transition period, tentatively using GitHub to
determine it's suitability for our workflows, and shut off JIRA later?
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 5:51 PM Josh Elser <els...@apache.org> wrote:
I disagree with Mike in that I don't find JIRA to be so painful that it
necessitates us changing, but I wouldn't block a move to GH issues if
turn off our JIRA use.
On 2/14/18 4:29 PM, Mike Drob wrote:
@josh - How do you feel about move from JIRA to GH Issues completely?
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 3:26 PM, Josh Elser <els...@apache.org>
I believe I already stated -1 the last time this was brought up.
Using two issue trackers is silly.
On 2/14/18 3:30 PM, Mike Walch wrote:
I want to enable GitHub issues for Accumulo's repos. This is not to
JIRA but to give contributors more options for issue tracking.
are objections, I will create an infra ticket this week.