Can you elaborate on what kind of human controls you mean? What if a user finds the GH issues and creates an issue there? What action should the developers take?
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:27 PM Josh Elser <els...@apache.org> wrote: > I didn't ask for automated controls here -- human controls are fine. > > I have already said I am -1 on two concurrent issue trackers. If > developers want to evaluate them, that's fine. > > On 2/14/18 10:12 PM, Christopher wrote: > > I don't think we have the ability to lock out non-committers from > creating > > new GH issues if we enable them, nor do I think it would make sense to do > > so, since that's a valuable use case to consider during any trial period > > before shutting off JIRA. > > > > As for switching immediately to GH issues for non-primary repo (-website, > > -examples, -docker, etc...) I think that makes sense since those are > > already confusing when filed in the JIRA mixed in with the main repo's > > issues. > > > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 9:25 PM Josh Elser <els...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> I am OK with committers ONLY using GH issues on all repos (with clear > >> guidance as to what the heck the project is doing) or doing a > >> full-switch on the other repos. > >> > >> On 2/14/18 7:00 PM, Mike Miller wrote: > >>> We could do a trial period of GitHub issues for the accumulo sub-repos > >>> (accumulo-website, accumulo-examples...) then after a month or two > decide > >>> to switch or not. That way we won't have duplicate issues or the > >> confusion > >>> of having 2 trackers for one repository. > >>> > >>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 6:12 PM, Mike Walch <mwa...@apache.org> wrote: > >>> > >>>> +1 I think it makes sense to try out GitHub before shutting off JIRA. > >> This > >>>> period could be limited to a month or two. > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 5:59 PM, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> What if we had an interim transition period, tentatively using GitHub > >> to > >>>>> determine it's suitability for our workflows, and shut off JIRA > later? > >>>>> > >>>>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 5:51 PM Josh Elser <els...@apache.org> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> I disagree with Mike in that I don't find JIRA to be so painful that > >> it > >>>>>> necessitates us changing, but I wouldn't block a move to GH issues > if > >>>> we > >>>>>> turn off our JIRA use. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 2/14/18 4:29 PM, Mike Drob wrote: > >>>>>>> @josh - How do you feel about move from JIRA to GH Issues > completely? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 3:26 PM, Josh Elser <els...@apache.org> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I believe I already stated -1 the last time this was brought up. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Using two issue trackers is silly. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 2/14/18 3:30 PM, Mike Walch wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I want to enable GitHub issues for Accumulo's repos. This is not > to > >>>>>>>>> replace > >>>>>>>>> JIRA but to give contributors more options for issue tracking. > >>>> Unless > >>>>>>>>> there > >>>>>>>>> are objections, I will create an infra ticket this week. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > >
