I don't think this is a blocker, for example artemis uses jboss logging, this 
doesn't have a notice file

I think we just have to preserve them if present and for asf projects 
themselves eg artemis itself it's policy to provide one for the asf work.

Sent from my iPhone

> On 29 Jun 2017, at 01:09, W B D <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I've been using hawtio alongside the classic web console in ActiveMQ 5.x
> and have been quite happy with it. I find it easier to use for many common
> operations as well as for general monitoring, and it is definitely a gap in
> the current Artemis distribution, so I would certainly welcome built-in
> hawtio support as a good addition.
> 
> Although the source code already contains the standard license assignment
> to ASF, it does not include a NOTICE file. We could ask Redhat for one, or
> construct one crediting them with the original work, or add a stanza to the
> top-level NOTICE file if that is more appropriate. IMO, the package and
> class name org.jboss.plugin.PluginContextListener could probably be changed
> in our copy, both to establish custody and to give a clearer name.
> 
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 9:27 AM, MichaelAndrePearce <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Guys,
>> 
>> It's been some time since this discussion thread without seemingly any
>> movement.
>> 
>> Artemis Project is really suffering from having any kind of management
>> console. With continued questions and calls from users especially as it's
>> picking up traction and deployment.
>> 
>> As such could I propose, that as lack of movement on any other solution and
>> Hawtio is pretty much in a usable state, with a plugin also out there in
>> the
>> wild. (It's ASL)
>> 
>> That for the interim on artemis project we build and release with Hawtio
>> and
>> an artemis plugin (if RH would donate their plugin to artemis project?)
>> 
>> Any objectors?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.
>> nabble.com/DISCUSS-Removing-the-Web-Console-tp4717136p4728020.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> 

Reply via email to