Speaking the plain truth... The issue is that the hawtio console that was used years ago.. looked like a commercial product outside of apache
I think that if we clear that now.. if it looks an apache look & feel.. people wouldn't have an issue with it. That would require some cleanup.. move to a newer hawtio plugin maybe? that's when we thought about trying new routes if we would need to do a lot of work anyways. On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Michael André Pearce <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't think this is a blocker, for example artemis uses jboss logging, this > doesn't have a notice file > > I think we just have to preserve them if present and for asf projects > themselves eg artemis itself it's policy to provide one for the asf work. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 29 Jun 2017, at 01:09, W B D <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I've been using hawtio alongside the classic web console in ActiveMQ 5.x >> and have been quite happy with it. I find it easier to use for many common >> operations as well as for general monitoring, and it is definitely a gap in >> the current Artemis distribution, so I would certainly welcome built-in >> hawtio support as a good addition. >> >> Although the source code already contains the standard license assignment >> to ASF, it does not include a NOTICE file. We could ask Redhat for one, or >> construct one crediting them with the original work, or add a stanza to the >> top-level NOTICE file if that is more appropriate. IMO, the package and >> class name org.jboss.plugin.PluginContextListener could probably be changed >> in our copy, both to establish custody and to give a clearer name. >> >> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 9:27 AM, MichaelAndrePearce < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Guys, >>> >>> It's been some time since this discussion thread without seemingly any >>> movement. >>> >>> Artemis Project is really suffering from having any kind of management >>> console. With continued questions and calls from users especially as it's >>> picking up traction and deployment. >>> >>> As such could I propose, that as lack of movement on any other solution and >>> Hawtio is pretty much in a usable state, with a plugin also out there in >>> the >>> wild. (It's ASL) >>> >>> That for the interim on artemis project we build and release with Hawtio >>> and >>> an artemis plugin (if RH would donate their plugin to artemis project?) >>> >>> Any objectors? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4. >>> nabble.com/DISCUSS-Removing-the-Web-Console-tp4717136p4728020.html >>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> -- Clebert Suconic
