Please catch me up here - are we saying that the Artemis built-in web console will be running HawtIO???
Art On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 7:15 AM, rajdavies [via ActiveMQ] < [email protected]> wrote: > On the “about” page - it would be polite to reference the hawtio comunity > - i.e. “Artemis Management console is powered by hawtio: hawt.io < > http://hawt.io/>” etc - as there is no powered by logo. > > > On 3 Jul 2017, at 23:52, Michael André Pearce <[hidden email] > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4728199&i=0>> wrote: > > > > Ok, > > > > So i think we can do this. From a local build. > > > > Please see screenshots. > > > > https://gist.github.com/michaelandrepearce/ > 98b4be98d20f407c2d745a41df9cef03 <https://gist.github.com/ > michaelandrepearce/98b4be98d20f407c2d745a41df9cef03> > > > > For 1) I think we have managed to completely skin it, with all hawtio > references removed, even the favicon. > > For 2) Only the artemis plugin and base jvm plugins, no extras for any > other products. > > For 3) Im hoping we can come to agreement on this gets contributed in > from the rh-messaging project @clebert @martyn @andy?, if not we can > probably code up a simpler version of it for now without bells and > whistles, and add in the future features later. > > > > So if we sort point three, i think we can make this “acceptable” > > > > Cheers > > Mike > > > >> On 29 Jun 2017, at 19:17, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email] > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4728199&i=1>> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> On Jun 29, 2017, at 1:59 PM, Michael André Pearce <[hidden email] > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4728199&i=2> <mailto:[hidden > email] <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4728199&i=3>>> wrote: > >>> > >>> I believe we could make a simple activemq branding jar/war with the > selected new logo ;) once decided without too much trouble. > >>> > >>> I'd be happy to step up to try do this if no objectors. > >> > >> I discussed previously, what would NEED to be done for this to be > “acceptable”: > >> > >> 1) All branding/links/etc… in the console need to be re-skinned or > whatever to be “ActiveMQ”. All mentions of hawtio and links off to other > sites other than a possible small “powered by” type thing would need to be > removed. > >> > >> 2) All “plugins” and functionality that don’t pertain to things related > to ActiveMQ would need to be removed. > >> > >> 3) The “plugin" that presents ActiveMQ related stuff to the user MUST > live here at Apache and part of the ActiveMQ community. We cannot use the > one they provide (unless you can convince them to donate it to Apache). > >> > >> Unless all three happen, it’s a no-go. > >> > >> Dan > >> > >> > >>> > >>>> On 29 Jun 2017, at 16:51, Clebert Suconic <[hidden email] > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4728199&i=4>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Speaking the plain truth... The issue is that the hawtio console that > >>>> was used years ago.. looked like a commercial product outside of > >>>> apache > >>>> > >>>> I think that if we clear that now.. if it looks an apache look & > >>>> feel.. people wouldn't have an issue with it. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> That would require some cleanup.. move to a newer hawtio plugin > maybe? > >>>> that's when we thought about trying new routes if we would need to do > >>>> a lot of work anyways. > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Michael André Pearce > >>>> <[hidden email] > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4728199&i=5>> wrote: > >>>>> I don't think this is a blocker, for example artemis uses jboss > logging, this doesn't have a notice file > >>>>> > >>>>> I think we just have to preserve them if present and for asf > projects themselves eg artemis itself it's policy to provide one for the > asf work. > >>>>> > >>>>> Sent from my iPhone > >>>>> > >>>>>> On 29 Jun 2017, at 01:09, W B D <[hidden email] > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4728199&i=6>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I've been using hawtio alongside the classic web console in > ActiveMQ 5.x > >>>>>> and have been quite happy with it. I find it easier to use for many > common > >>>>>> operations as well as for general monitoring, and it is definitely > a gap in > >>>>>> the current Artemis distribution, so I would certainly welcome > built-in > >>>>>> hawtio support as a good addition. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Although the source code already contains the standard license > assignment > >>>>>> to ASF, it does not include a NOTICE file. We could ask Redhat for > one, or > >>>>>> construct one crediting them with the original work, or add a > stanza to the > >>>>>> top-level NOTICE file if that is more appropriate. IMO, the package > and > >>>>>> class name org.jboss.plugin.PluginContextListener could probably > be changed > >>>>>> in our copy, both to establish custody and to give a clearer name. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 9:27 AM, MichaelAndrePearce < > >>>>>> [hidden email] > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4728199&i=7>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi Guys, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> It's been some time since this discussion thread without seemingly > any > >>>>>>> movement. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Artemis Project is really suffering from having any kind of > management > >>>>>>> console. With continued questions and calls from users especially > as it's > >>>>>>> picking up traction and deployment. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> As such could I propose, that as lack of movement on any other > solution and > >>>>>>> Hawtio is pretty much in a usable state, with a plugin also out > there in > >>>>>>> the > >>>>>>> wild. (It's ASL) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> That for the interim on artemis project we build and release with > Hawtio > >>>>>>> and > >>>>>>> an artemis plugin (if RH would donate their plugin to artemis > project?) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Any objectors? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4. > >>>>>>> nabble.com/DISCUSS-Removing-the-Web-Console-tp4717136p4728020.html > >>>>>>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Clebert Suconic > >> > >> -- > >> Daniel Kulp > >> [hidden email] <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4728199&i=8> > <mailto:[hidden email] > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4728199&i=9>> - > http://dankulp.com/blog <http://dankulp.com/blog> > >> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com <http > ://coders.talend.com/> > > > > ------------------------------ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Removing-the-Web-Console- > tp4717136p4728199.html > To start a new topic under ActiveMQ - Dev, email > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from ActiveMQ - Dev, click here > <http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=2368404&code=YXJ0QGFtbGludi5jb218MjM2ODQwNHwyMDc3NjQwODU5> > . > NAML > <http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> > -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Removing-the-Web-Console-tp4717136p4728203.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
