I believe we could make a simple activemq branding jar/war with the selected new logo ;) once decided without too much trouble.
I'd be happy to step up to try do this if no objectors. > On 29 Jun 2017, at 16:51, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote: > > Speaking the plain truth... The issue is that the hawtio console that > was used years ago.. looked like a commercial product outside of > apache > > I think that if we clear that now.. if it looks an apache look & > feel.. people wouldn't have an issue with it. > > > That would require some cleanup.. move to a newer hawtio plugin maybe? > that's when we thought about trying new routes if we would need to do > a lot of work anyways. > > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Michael André Pearce > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I don't think this is a blocker, for example artemis uses jboss logging, >> this doesn't have a notice file >> >> I think we just have to preserve them if present and for asf projects >> themselves eg artemis itself it's policy to provide one for the asf work. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On 29 Jun 2017, at 01:09, W B D <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I've been using hawtio alongside the classic web console in ActiveMQ 5.x >>> and have been quite happy with it. I find it easier to use for many common >>> operations as well as for general monitoring, and it is definitely a gap in >>> the current Artemis distribution, so I would certainly welcome built-in >>> hawtio support as a good addition. >>> >>> Although the source code already contains the standard license assignment >>> to ASF, it does not include a NOTICE file. We could ask Redhat for one, or >>> construct one crediting them with the original work, or add a stanza to the >>> top-level NOTICE file if that is more appropriate. IMO, the package and >>> class name org.jboss.plugin.PluginContextListener could probably be changed >>> in our copy, both to establish custody and to give a clearer name. >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 9:27 AM, MichaelAndrePearce < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Guys, >>>> >>>> It's been some time since this discussion thread without seemingly any >>>> movement. >>>> >>>> Artemis Project is really suffering from having any kind of management >>>> console. With continued questions and calls from users especially as it's >>>> picking up traction and deployment. >>>> >>>> As such could I propose, that as lack of movement on any other solution and >>>> Hawtio is pretty much in a usable state, with a plugin also out there in >>>> the >>>> wild. (It's ASL) >>>> >>>> That for the interim on artemis project we build and release with Hawtio >>>> and >>>> an artemis plugin (if RH would donate their plugin to artemis project?) >>>> >>>> Any objectors? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4. >>>> nabble.com/DISCUSS-Removing-the-Web-Console-tp4717136p4728020.html >>>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic
