Daniel Kulp wrote > I personally think the “adoption argument” is bull shit. That’s like > saying the Tomcat community cannot release Tomcat 9 until the adoption of > "Tomcat 9 (beta)” becomes significant. That’s just dumb. So it really > comes down to features and documentation/migration. Again, get a roadmap > in place that documents what needs to be done, get docs and such updated, > promote it as an alpha/beta/whatever to get those that are willing to test > it to do so, and when it’s ready, we release as 6.0. (and, IMO, it > doesn’t need to be perfect to be 6.0. We can always spin a 6.0.1 or 6.1 > if folks run into issues that haven’t been found)
That's apples to oranges and comparing Tomcat to this isn't even in the realm of reasonable or correct. This is a different animal all together. Lets move on at this stage... it looks like we have a direction. -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
