To be quite frank, I'm offended by some of the accusations made in this
thread.
After the last round of accusations of Red Hat are pushing through their
own agenda, I'm sad to see it happening again. I continue to use my Red
Hat email address in public discussions, in my PR requests and review.
I've nothing to hide nor am I ashamed to be employed by a company like Red
Hat. My legions lie with ActiveMQ and making the project and community a
better place. I've put so much personal and emotional effort into this
project. To have my votes and opinions abrogated just because I work for a
certain company I find shocking and not at all democratic.
Actually, looking back through this vote thread to the people who voted +1,
who were accused of pushing an alternate agenda are actually the same
people who I see involved in the community on a day to day basis. The same
people fixing bugs, answering user questions and doing releases. And
they're not all employed by the same company.
If people want to vote -1 to this, fair enough you're entitled to your vote
and I have no issue. But, all this talk about companies pushing an agenda,
seems to me to be a bit of a guise to detract away from the actual subject
in hand. TBH, I am sick of hearing about it.
I respect the result of the vote.
I am -1 on the idea of making Artemis TLP.
I am +1 on Bruce's suggestion on creating a Roadmap. I think this is
really what we need right now.
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 3:41 AM, Michael André Pearce <
michael.andre.pea...@me.com> wrote:
> On the website front I’m happy to stick my hand up, giving it an overhaul
> and design inline with the new logo.
>
> Mike
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 6 Dec 2017, at 22:57, Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I agree that the website needs an overhaul and I'm interested to take on
> > this task. I also agree that Artemis should somehow be made more
> prominent
> > on the website, but how to do this is more debatable. I will start a
> > separate discussion around this.
> >
> > More discussions on the dev list is *always* a good thing.
> >
> > Bruce
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Ok... so, consider this a CANCEL on this vote...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I think we have things settled.. and some positive factors from this
> >> thread:
> >>
> >> - All agreed to make Artemis more prominent on the website.
> >> - Refactor the website... like.. now... with Artemis being brought
> >> forward.. (the website needs a facelift regardless)
> >> ... any volunteers here?
> >> ... we will need a discuss here... Honestly I don't like the confluent
> >> wiki.
> >> - Have more discussions on the dev list
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > perl -e 'print
> > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
> >
> > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> > Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>
