To echo the thoughts of Matt and Michael...I don't work for RH either so I
agree with what others have said about not lumping everyone together.

On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree that the website needs an overhaul and I'm interested to take on
> this task. I also agree that Artemis should somehow be made more prominent
> on the website, but how to do this is more debatable. I will start a
> separate discussion around this.
>
> More discussions on the dev list is *always* a good thing.
>
> Bruce
>
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Ok... so, consider this a CANCEL on this vote...
> >
> >
> >
> > I think we have things settled.. and some positive factors from this
> > thread:
> >
> > - All agreed to make Artemis more prominent on the website.
> > - Refactor the website... like.. now...  with Artemis being brought
> > forward.. (the website needs a facelift regardless)
> >    ... any volunteers here?
> >    ... we will need a discuss here... Honestly I don't like the confluent
> > wiki.
> > - Have more discussions on the dev list
> >
>
>
>
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
>
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>

Reply via email to