To echo the thoughts of Matt and Michael...I don't work for RH either so I agree with what others have said about not lumping everyone together.
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree that the website needs an overhaul and I'm interested to take on > this task. I also agree that Artemis should somehow be made more prominent > on the website, but how to do this is more debatable. I will start a > separate discussion around this. > > More discussions on the dev list is *always* a good thing. > > Bruce > > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > Ok... so, consider this a CANCEL on this vote... > > > > > > > > I think we have things settled.. and some positive factors from this > > thread: > > > > - All agreed to make Artemis more prominent on the website. > > - Refactor the website... like.. now... with Artemis being brought > > forward.. (the website needs a facelift regardless) > > ... any volunteers here? > > ... we will need a discuss here... Honestly I don't like the confluent > > wiki. > > - Have more discussions on the dev list > > > > > > -- > perl -e 'print > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );' > > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ > Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/> > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder >