On the website front I’m happy to stick my hand up, giving it an overhaul and
design inline with the new logo.
Mike
Sent from my iPhone
> On 6 Dec 2017, at 22:57, Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I agree that the website needs an overhaul and I'm interested to take on
> this task. I also agree that Artemis should somehow be made more prominent
> on the website, but how to do this is more debatable. I will start a
> separate discussion around this.
>
> More discussions on the dev list is *always* a good thing.
>
> Bruce
>
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Ok... so, consider this a CANCEL on this vote...
>>
>>
>>
>> I think we have things settled.. and some positive factors from this
>> thread:
>>
>> - All agreed to make Artemis more prominent on the website.
>> - Refactor the website... like.. now... with Artemis being brought
>> forward.. (the website needs a facelift regardless)
>> ... any volunteers here?
>> ... we will need a discuss here... Honestly I don't like the confluent
>> wiki.
>> - Have more discussions on the dev list
>>
>
>
>
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
>
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
