On Mar 22, 2013, at 12:15 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > Please find the wiki on related research literature at [1]. > > [1] - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRAVATA/Related+Research+ > Literature This is very good collection, Thanks Danushka. Suresh > Thanks, > Danushka > > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I would also recommend [3] and [4] for those of you who are just stepping >> in. >> >> [3]A. Barker and J. Van Hemert, “Scientific workflow: a survey and >> research directions,” Parallel Processing and Applied Mathematics, pp. >> 746–753, 2008. >> >> [4]Y. Gil, E. Deelman, M. Ellisman, T. Fahringer, G. Fox, D. Gannon, C. >> Goble, M. Livny, L. Moreau, and J. Myers, Report on the 2006 NSF Workshop >> on Challenges of Scientific Workflows. Citeseer, 2006. >> >> Thanks, >> Danushka >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Pavithra Kulathilaka < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> One of a resource I referred was [1] which covers basic details to start >>> with workflow engines. >>> Also they have done a review on existing solutions for workflow >>> applications and their limitations with respect to scalability and >>> on-demand access. So I think this would be a great starting point. [1] >>> refers another research paper [2] (Chris has also mentioned about this) >>> which presents a detailed survey of existing Grid workflow systems w.r.t >>> their design, scheduling, information retrieval, fault tolerant and data >>> movement. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Pavithra. >>> >>> [1] S. Pandey, D. Karunamoorthy, and R. Buyya, “Workflow engine for >>> clouds,” Cloud Computing, >>> Principles and Paradigms, Wiley Series on Parallel and Distributed >>> Computing, pp. 321–344, 2011. >>> >>> [2] A Taxonomy of Workflow Management Systems for Grid Computing, Jia Yu >>> and Rajkumar Buyya >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Sanjaya Medonsa <[email protected] >>>> wrote: >>> >>>> I agree with Danushka. When it comes to workflow engines I think it is >>>> better to study general concepts of workflow engines first and then >>> study >>>> the prominent *Scientific* work flow engines (Some of the challenges are >>>> different from business workflow engines). Each prominent workflow >>> engine >>>> comprise of several unique features and concepts while major >>> abstraction is >>>> workflows. I would like to add Apache OODT into list of prominent >>> workflow >>>> engines (Workflow processing components are key part of Apache OODT and >>>> used in several NASA missions and other research) . I have already some >>>> work on these items and would like to contribute them into wiki. >>>> >>>> /Sanjaya >>>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I would say, >>>>> >>>>> 1. Science Gateways >>>>> 2. Workflow Engines >>>>> 3. Data/Compute-Intensive Computing >>>>> 4. Challenges and Opportunities in Science Gateways >>>>> 5. Research Directions (Big Data, Provenance, Meta Data) (Maybe >>> relates >>>> to >>>>> 4) >>>>> >>>>> Danushka >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Shahani Markus Weerawarana < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> HI All, >>>>>> >>>>>> There are a few postgraduate research students who have done >>>> significant >>>>>> literature reviews on science gateways etc. Maybe it is time to >>> harness >>>>> all >>>>>> this background reading work that has been done individually and >>> list >>>> the >>>>>> papers (links) in categories on the Airavata website. >>>>>> >>>>>> Danushka, Pavithra, and Sanjaya - what are your thoughts on the >>>>> categories >>>>>> based on the work you have already completed? >>>>>> >>>>>> Shahani >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:22 PM, AMILA RANATUNGA < >>> [email protected] >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you for the reply. I am also working in the same project. We >>>>> looked >>>>>>> some research papers science gateways. We found some interesting >>>> facts >>>>>>> about science gateways in the research paper 'TeraGrid Science >>>> Gateways >>>>>> and >>>>>>> Their Impact on Science' [1] which talks about 4 successful >>> science >>>>>>> gateways including LEAD. And we got to know that LEAD project has >>>>> caused >>>>>> to >>>>>>> the development of AIRAVATA which is used to build science >>> gateways. >>>>> And >>>>>>> the research paper '*Apache Airavata : A framework for Distributed >>>>>>> Applications and Computational Workflows*' describes about some >>> work >>>>> flow >>>>>>> systems Taverna, Triana ..etc. >>>>>>> And it says these are tools to build science gateways. >>>>>>> And we came to a conclusion that AIRAVATA, Taverna, Triana doing >>>>> similar >>>>>>> kind of job (please correct me if I am wrong). And tried to figure >>>> out >>>>>> what >>>>>>> is so unique in AIRAVATA comparing to theses. We would like to >>> have >>>>> some >>>>>>> good references if we are moving in the wrong path determining >>> what >>>> is >>>>>>> AIRAVATA. We are working full time in this project. Your help is >>>> really >>>>>>> appreciated. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank You ! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4668681&tag=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D4668681%26tag%3D1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> HI Harsha, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Airavata is a Distributed Computing framework in which Workflow >>> is >>>> a >>>>>>>> component. A good place to start is to do literature study on >>>> Science >>>>>>>> Gateways. We will need to compile a set of reference papers to >>> make >>>>> it >>>>>>> easy >>>>>>>> for you to get an understanding on. You will quickly realize the >>>> best >>>>>> way >>>>>>>> to find out differences in features in open source projects is >>>>> cracking >>>>>>>> open the code. So I suggest downloading the code, going through >>>>>> tutorials >>>>>>>> and asking questions on the corresponding mailing lists of the >>>> tools >>>>>> you >>>>>>>> are comparing against. You identified a good first list, please >>>> keep >>>>>>>> sharing your learnings so future users/students like you will >>>> benefit >>>>>>> from >>>>>>>> your contributions. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Suresh >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mar 11, 2013, at 5:41 AM, Harsha Kumara <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi all! >>>>>>>>> We are doing research on OGC's WPS integration to the >>>>> Airavata.During >>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> research we have found some existing work flow generation >>> tools >>>>> like >>>>>>>>> Tarverna, Kepler , >>>>>>>>> Pegasus and Triana. We would like if we can some details and >>>> points >>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>> how Apache Airavata is differ from those tools? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> *Harsha Kumara* >>>>>>>>> *Undergraduate* >>>>>>>>> *Department of Computer Science and Engineering* >>>>>>>>> *University of Moratuwa* >>>>>>>>> *Sri Lanka.* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> *Shahani Markus Weerawarana, Ph.D.* >>>>>> *Computer Scientist* >>>>>> Visiting Fellow, University of New South Wales, Australia. >>>>>> Visiting Scientist, Indiana University, USA. >>>>>> Visiting Lecturer, University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Pavithra Kulathilaka. >>> >> >>
