Hi, Thank you very much for the resources. They will be really helpful for our project to gain a lot of knowledge in the context and move on.
Thanks, Sameera On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake <[email protected]>wrote: > Nice one Danushka ! > > Thanks for the contribution. > > Lahiru > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Great job guys! > > > > On 3/22/13 4:39 AM, "Marlon Pierce" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > >Hash: SHA1 > > > > > >Yes, +1, this is a good collection. > > > > > > > > >Marlon > > > > > > > > >On 3/22/13 7:37 AM, Suresh Marru wrote: > > >> On Mar 22, 2013, at 12:15 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura > > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> Please find the wiki on related research literature at [1]. > > >>> > > >>> [1] - > > >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRAVATA/Related+Research+ > > >>> > > >>> > > >Literature > > >> > > >> This is very good collection, Thanks Danushka. > > >> > > >> Suresh > > >> > > >>> Thanks, Danushka > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura < > > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> I would also recommend [3] and [4] for those of you who are > > >>>> just stepping in. > > >>>> > > >>>> [3]A. Barker and J. Van Hemert, ³Scientific workflow: a survey > > >>>> and research directions,² Parallel Processing and Applied > > >>>> Mathematics, pp. 746753, 2008. > > >>>> > > >>>> [4]Y. Gil, E. Deelman, M. Ellisman, T. Fahringer, G. Fox, D. > > >>>> Gannon, C. Goble, M. Livny, L. Moreau, and J. Myers, Report on > > >>>> the 2006 NSF Workshop on Challenges of Scientific Workflows. > > >>>> Citeseer, 2006. > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks, Danushka > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Pavithra Kulathilaka < > > >>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Hi, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> One of a resource I referred was [1] which covers basic > > >>>>> details to start with workflow engines. Also they have done a > > >>>>> review on existing solutions for workflow applications and > > >>>>> their limitations with respect to scalability and on-demand > > >>>>> access. So I think this would be a great starting point. [1] > > >>>>> refers another research paper [2] (Chris has also mentioned > > >>>>> about this) which presents a detailed survey of existing Grid > > >>>>> workflow systems w.r.t their design, scheduling, information > > >>>>> retrieval, fault tolerant and data movement. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Regards, Pavithra. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> [1] S. Pandey, D. Karunamoorthy, and R. Buyya, ³Workflow > > >>>>> engine for clouds,² Cloud Computing, Principles and > > >>>>> Paradigms, Wiley Series on Parallel and Distributed > > >>>>> Computing, pp. 321344, 2011. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> [2] A Taxonomy of Workflow Management Systems for Grid > > >>>>> Computing, Jia Yu and Rajkumar Buyya > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Sanjaya Medonsa > > >>>>> <[email protected] > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> I agree with Danushka. When it comes to workflow engines I > > >>>>>> think it is better to study general concepts of workflow > > >>>>>> engines first and then > > >>>>> study > > >>>>>> the prominent *Scientific* work flow engines (Some of the > > >>>>>> challenges are different from business workflow engines). > > >>>>>> Each prominent workflow > > >>>>> engine > > >>>>>> comprise of several unique features and concepts while > > >>>>>> major > > >>>>> abstraction is > > >>>>>> workflows. I would like to add Apache OODT into list of > > >>>>>> prominent > > >>>>> workflow > > >>>>>> engines (Workflow processing components are key part of > > >>>>>> Apache OODT and used in several NASA missions and other > > >>>>>> research) . I have already some work on these items and > > >>>>>> would like to contribute them into wiki. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> /Sanjaya > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura < > > >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I would say, > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> 1. Science Gateways 2. Workflow Engines 3. > > >>>>>>> Data/Compute-Intensive Computing 4. Challenges and > > >>>>>>> Opportunities in Science Gateways 5. Research Directions > > >>>>>>> (Big Data, Provenance, Meta Data) (Maybe > > >>>>> relates > > >>>>>> to > > >>>>>>> 4) > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Danushka > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Shahani Markus > > >>>>>>> Weerawarana < [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> HI All, > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> There are a few postgraduate research students who have > > >>>>>>>> done > > >>>>>> significant > > >>>>>>>> literature reviews on science gateways etc. Maybe it is > > >>>>>>>> time to > > >>>>> harness > > >>>>>>> all > > >>>>>>>> this background reading work that has been done > > >>>>>>>> individually and > > >>>>> list > > >>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>> papers (links) in categories on the Airavata website. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Danushka, Pavithra, and Sanjaya - what are your > > >>>>>>>> thoughts on the > > >>>>>>> categories > > >>>>>>>> based on the work you have already completed? > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Shahani > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:22 PM, AMILA RANATUNGA < > > >>>>> [email protected] > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Thank you for the reply. I am also working in the > > >>>>>>>>> same project. We > > >>>>>>> looked > > >>>>>>>>> some research papers science gateways. We found some > > >>>>>>>>> interesting > > >>>>>> facts > > >>>>>>>>> about science gateways in the research paper > > >>>>>>>>> 'TeraGrid Science > > >>>>>> Gateways > > >>>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>> Their Impact on Science' [1] which talks about 4 > > >>>>>>>>> successful > > >>>>> science > > >>>>>>>>> gateways including LEAD. And we got to know that LEAD > > >>>>>>>>> project has > > >>>>>>> caused > > >>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>> the development of AIRAVATA which is used to build > > >>>>>>>>> science > > >>>>> gateways. > > >>>>>>> And > > >>>>>>>>> the research paper '*Apache Airavata : A framework > > >>>>>>>>> for Distributed Applications and Computational > > >>>>>>>>> Workflows*' describes about some > > >>>>> work > > >>>>>>> flow > > >>>>>>>>> systems Taverna, Triana ..etc. And it says these are > > >>>>>>>>> tools to build science gateways. And we came to a > > >>>>>>>>> conclusion that AIRAVATA, Taverna, Triana doing > > >>>>>>> similar > > >>>>>>>>> kind of job (please correct me if I am wrong). And > > >>>>>>>>> tried to figure > > >>>>>> out > > >>>>>>>> what > > >>>>>>>>> is so unique in AIRAVATA comparing to theses. We > > >>>>>>>>> would like to > > >>>>> have > > >>>>>>> some > > >>>>>>>>> good references if we are moving in the wrong path > > >>>>>>>>> determining > > >>>>> what > > >>>>>> is > > >>>>>>>>> AIRAVATA. We are working full time in this project. > > >>>>>>>>> Your help is > > >>>>>> really > > >>>>>>>>> appreciated. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Thank You ! > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> [1] > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4668681&tag=1&ur > > >>>>>l=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org > > %2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D4 > > >>>>>668681%26tag%3D1 > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]> > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> HI Harsha, > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Airavata is a Distributed Computing framework in > > >>>>>>>>>> which Workflow > > >>>>> is > > >>>>>> a > > >>>>>>>>>> component. A good place to start is to do > > >>>>>>>>>> literature study on > > >>>>>> Science > > >>>>>>>>>> Gateways. We will need to compile a set of > > >>>>>>>>>> reference papers to > > >>>>> make > > >>>>>>> it > > >>>>>>>>> easy > > >>>>>>>>>> for you to get an understanding on. You will > > >>>>>>>>>> quickly realize the > > >>>>>> best > > >>>>>>>> way > > >>>>>>>>>> to find out differences in features in open source > > >>>>>>>>>> projects is > > >>>>>>> cracking > > >>>>>>>>>> open the code. So I suggest downloading the code, > > >>>>>>>>>> going through > > >>>>>>>> tutorials > > >>>>>>>>>> and asking questions on the corresponding mailing > > >>>>>>>>>> lists of the > > >>>>>> tools > > >>>>>>>> you > > >>>>>>>>>> are comparing against. You identified a good first > > >>>>>>>>>> list, please > > >>>>>> keep > > >>>>>>>>>> sharing your learnings so future users/students > > >>>>>>>>>> like you will > > >>>>>> benefit > > >>>>>>>>> from > > >>>>>>>>>> your contributions. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Suresh > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Mar 11, 2013, at 5:41 AM, Harsha Kumara > > >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi all! We are doing research on OGC's WPS > > >>>>>>>>>>> integration to the > > >>>>>>> Airavata.During > > >>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>> research we have found some existing work flow > > >>>>>>>>>>> generation > > >>>>> tools > > >>>>>>> like > > >>>>>>>>>>> Tarverna, Kepler , Pegasus and Triana. We would > > >>>>>>>>>>> like if we can some details and > > >>>>>> points > > >>>>>>>>> about > > >>>>>>>>>>> how Apache Airavata is differ from those tools? > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! -- *Harsha Kumara* *Undergraduate* > > >>>>>>>>>>> *Department of Computer Science and Engineering* > > >>>>>>>>>>> *University of Moratuwa* *Sri Lanka.* > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> -- *Shahani Markus Weerawarana, Ph.D.* *Computer > > >>>>>>>> Scientist* Visiting Fellow, University of New South > > >>>>>>>> Wales, Australia. Visiting Scientist, Indiana > > >>>>>>>> University, USA. Visiting Lecturer, University of > > >>>>>>>> Moratuwa, Sri Lanka. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -- Pavithra Kulathilaka. > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > >Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) > > >Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org > > >Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > > > > >iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRTEL1AAoJEOEgD2XReDo5ZmoH/1+RK9piuyh3uLXoE2qZThw6 > > >OU9e0oKK1w4gvyuGY4wdWWb0tKrR2GJGJzYzQoWt+F2xkbdA5OrHWm2LQjHyNi87 > > >O+hD6zGgDx0uReK9IFw4dUpFZHKCNUatKys69BDuc2uy7OdHQdSvzT6CEEXgOEN5 > > >2qkSf52tlFjS+zsO9mpDVW4XNGS4TzyhHGCZWIMJi3Vtj2cu+Kf8gZtCq+Zmndiu > > >8ioDbq+DLkMUsAhdSm2Z1Yi3VMg8zNhv+1VYfiUZKv8lBgqA16Ziv/c3axMfofgF > > >Kbka506bBQ+ZxB6ubAqGPMdB+Sqjcd/G1LwpTfNYjhJA19VidYghiQFZPHodakM= > > >=NfHF > > >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > > > -- > System Analyst Programmer > PTI Lab > Indiana University > -- *Sameera Jayaratna* *Undergraduate* *Department of Computer Science And Engineering* *University of Moratuwa* *Sri Lanka*
