Nice one Danushka ! Thanks for the contribution.
Lahiru On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) < [email protected]> wrote: > Great job guys! > > On 3/22/13 4:39 AM, "Marlon Pierce" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >Hash: SHA1 > > > >Yes, +1, this is a good collection. > > > > > >Marlon > > > > > >On 3/22/13 7:37 AM, Suresh Marru wrote: > >> On Mar 22, 2013, at 12:15 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Please find the wiki on related research literature at [1]. > >>> > >>> [1] - > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRAVATA/Related+Research+ > >>> > >>> > >Literature > >> > >> This is very good collection, Thanks Danushka. > >> > >> Suresh > >> > >>> Thanks, Danushka > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura < > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I would also recommend [3] and [4] for those of you who are > >>>> just stepping in. > >>>> > >>>> [3]A. Barker and J. Van Hemert, ³Scientific workflow: a survey > >>>> and research directions,² Parallel Processing and Applied > >>>> Mathematics, pp. 746753, 2008. > >>>> > >>>> [4]Y. Gil, E. Deelman, M. Ellisman, T. Fahringer, G. Fox, D. > >>>> Gannon, C. Goble, M. Livny, L. Moreau, and J. Myers, Report on > >>>> the 2006 NSF Workshop on Challenges of Scientific Workflows. > >>>> Citeseer, 2006. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, Danushka > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Pavithra Kulathilaka < > >>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> One of a resource I referred was [1] which covers basic > >>>>> details to start with workflow engines. Also they have done a > >>>>> review on existing solutions for workflow applications and > >>>>> their limitations with respect to scalability and on-demand > >>>>> access. So I think this would be a great starting point. [1] > >>>>> refers another research paper [2] (Chris has also mentioned > >>>>> about this) which presents a detailed survey of existing Grid > >>>>> workflow systems w.r.t their design, scheduling, information > >>>>> retrieval, fault tolerant and data movement. > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards, Pavithra. > >>>>> > >>>>> [1] S. Pandey, D. Karunamoorthy, and R. Buyya, ³Workflow > >>>>> engine for clouds,² Cloud Computing, Principles and > >>>>> Paradigms, Wiley Series on Parallel and Distributed > >>>>> Computing, pp. 321344, 2011. > >>>>> > >>>>> [2] A Taxonomy of Workflow Management Systems for Grid > >>>>> Computing, Jia Yu and Rajkumar Buyya > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Sanjaya Medonsa > >>>>> <[email protected] > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> I agree with Danushka. When it comes to workflow engines I > >>>>>> think it is better to study general concepts of workflow > >>>>>> engines first and then > >>>>> study > >>>>>> the prominent *Scientific* work flow engines (Some of the > >>>>>> challenges are different from business workflow engines). > >>>>>> Each prominent workflow > >>>>> engine > >>>>>> comprise of several unique features and concepts while > >>>>>> major > >>>>> abstraction is > >>>>>> workflows. I would like to add Apache OODT into list of > >>>>>> prominent > >>>>> workflow > >>>>>> engines (Workflow processing components are key part of > >>>>>> Apache OODT and used in several NASA missions and other > >>>>>> research) . I have already some work on these items and > >>>>>> would like to contribute them into wiki. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> /Sanjaya > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura < > >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I would say, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> 1. Science Gateways 2. Workflow Engines 3. > >>>>>>> Data/Compute-Intensive Computing 4. Challenges and > >>>>>>> Opportunities in Science Gateways 5. Research Directions > >>>>>>> (Big Data, Provenance, Meta Data) (Maybe > >>>>> relates > >>>>>> to > >>>>>>> 4) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Danushka > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Shahani Markus > >>>>>>> Weerawarana < [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> HI All, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> There are a few postgraduate research students who have > >>>>>>>> done > >>>>>> significant > >>>>>>>> literature reviews on science gateways etc. Maybe it is > >>>>>>>> time to > >>>>> harness > >>>>>>> all > >>>>>>>> this background reading work that has been done > >>>>>>>> individually and > >>>>> list > >>>>>> the > >>>>>>>> papers (links) in categories on the Airavata website. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Danushka, Pavithra, and Sanjaya - what are your > >>>>>>>> thoughts on the > >>>>>>> categories > >>>>>>>> based on the work you have already completed? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Shahani > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:22 PM, AMILA RANATUNGA < > >>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Thank you for the reply. I am also working in the > >>>>>>>>> same project. We > >>>>>>> looked > >>>>>>>>> some research papers science gateways. We found some > >>>>>>>>> interesting > >>>>>> facts > >>>>>>>>> about science gateways in the research paper > >>>>>>>>> 'TeraGrid Science > >>>>>> Gateways > >>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>> Their Impact on Science' [1] which talks about 4 > >>>>>>>>> successful > >>>>> science > >>>>>>>>> gateways including LEAD. And we got to know that LEAD > >>>>>>>>> project has > >>>>>>> caused > >>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>> the development of AIRAVATA which is used to build > >>>>>>>>> science > >>>>> gateways. > >>>>>>> And > >>>>>>>>> the research paper '*Apache Airavata : A framework > >>>>>>>>> for Distributed Applications and Computational > >>>>>>>>> Workflows*' describes about some > >>>>> work > >>>>>>> flow > >>>>>>>>> systems Taverna, Triana ..etc. And it says these are > >>>>>>>>> tools to build science gateways. And we came to a > >>>>>>>>> conclusion that AIRAVATA, Taverna, Triana doing > >>>>>>> similar > >>>>>>>>> kind of job (please correct me if I am wrong). And > >>>>>>>>> tried to figure > >>>>>> out > >>>>>>>> what > >>>>>>>>> is so unique in AIRAVATA comparing to theses. We > >>>>>>>>> would like to > >>>>> have > >>>>>>> some > >>>>>>>>> good references if we are moving in the wrong path > >>>>>>>>> determining > >>>>> what > >>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>> AIRAVATA. We are working full time in this project. > >>>>>>>>> Your help is > >>>>>> really > >>>>>>>>> appreciated. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Thank You ! > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4668681&tag=1&ur > >>>>>l=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org > %2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D4 > >>>>>668681%26tag%3D1 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> HI Harsha, > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Airavata is a Distributed Computing framework in > >>>>>>>>>> which Workflow > >>>>> is > >>>>>> a > >>>>>>>>>> component. A good place to start is to do > >>>>>>>>>> literature study on > >>>>>> Science > >>>>>>>>>> Gateways. We will need to compile a set of > >>>>>>>>>> reference papers to > >>>>> make > >>>>>>> it > >>>>>>>>> easy > >>>>>>>>>> for you to get an understanding on. You will > >>>>>>>>>> quickly realize the > >>>>>> best > >>>>>>>> way > >>>>>>>>>> to find out differences in features in open source > >>>>>>>>>> projects is > >>>>>>> cracking > >>>>>>>>>> open the code. So I suggest downloading the code, > >>>>>>>>>> going through > >>>>>>>> tutorials > >>>>>>>>>> and asking questions on the corresponding mailing > >>>>>>>>>> lists of the > >>>>>> tools > >>>>>>>> you > >>>>>>>>>> are comparing against. You identified a good first > >>>>>>>>>> list, please > >>>>>> keep > >>>>>>>>>> sharing your learnings so future users/students > >>>>>>>>>> like you will > >>>>>> benefit > >>>>>>>>> from > >>>>>>>>>> your contributions. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Suresh > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Mar 11, 2013, at 5:41 AM, Harsha Kumara > >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi all! We are doing research on OGC's WPS > >>>>>>>>>>> integration to the > >>>>>>> Airavata.During > >>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>> research we have found some existing work flow > >>>>>>>>>>> generation > >>>>> tools > >>>>>>> like > >>>>>>>>>>> Tarverna, Kepler , Pegasus and Triana. We would > >>>>>>>>>>> like if we can some details and > >>>>>> points > >>>>>>>>> about > >>>>>>>>>>> how Apache Airavata is differ from those tools? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! -- *Harsha Kumara* *Undergraduate* > >>>>>>>>>>> *Department of Computer Science and Engineering* > >>>>>>>>>>> *University of Moratuwa* *Sri Lanka.* > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- *Shahani Markus Weerawarana, Ph.D.* *Computer > >>>>>>>> Scientist* Visiting Fellow, University of New South > >>>>>>>> Wales, Australia. Visiting Scientist, Indiana > >>>>>>>> University, USA. Visiting Lecturer, University of > >>>>>>>> Moratuwa, Sri Lanka. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- Pavithra Kulathilaka. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > >Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) > >Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org > >Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > > >iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRTEL1AAoJEOEgD2XReDo5ZmoH/1+RK9piuyh3uLXoE2qZThw6 > >OU9e0oKK1w4gvyuGY4wdWWb0tKrR2GJGJzYzQoWt+F2xkbdA5OrHWm2LQjHyNi87 > >O+hD6zGgDx0uReK9IFw4dUpFZHKCNUatKys69BDuc2uy7OdHQdSvzT6CEEXgOEN5 > >2qkSf52tlFjS+zsO9mpDVW4XNGS4TzyhHGCZWIMJi3Vtj2cu+Kf8gZtCq+Zmndiu > >8ioDbq+DLkMUsAhdSm2Z1Yi3VMg8zNhv+1VYfiUZKv8lBgqA16Ziv/c3axMfofgF > >Kbka506bBQ+ZxB6ubAqGPMdB+Sqjcd/G1LwpTfNYjhJA19VidYghiQFZPHodakM= > >=NfHF > >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- System Analyst Programmer PTI Lab Indiana University
