Great job guys! On 3/22/13 4:39 AM, "Marlon Pierce" <[email protected]> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >Yes, +1, this is a good collection. > > >Marlon > > >On 3/22/13 7:37 AM, Suresh Marru wrote: >> On Mar 22, 2013, at 12:15 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Please find the wiki on related research literature at [1]. >>> >>> [1] - >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRAVATA/Related+Research+ >>> >>> >Literature >> >> This is very good collection, Thanks Danushka. >> >> Suresh >> >>> Thanks, Danushka >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I would also recommend [3] and [4] for those of you who are >>>> just stepping in. >>>> >>>> [3]A. Barker and J. Van Hemert, ³Scientific workflow: a survey >>>> and research directions,² Parallel Processing and Applied >>>> Mathematics, pp. 746753, 2008. >>>> >>>> [4]Y. Gil, E. Deelman, M. Ellisman, T. Fahringer, G. Fox, D. >>>> Gannon, C. Goble, M. Livny, L. Moreau, and J. Myers, Report on >>>> the 2006 NSF Workshop on Challenges of Scientific Workflows. >>>> Citeseer, 2006. >>>> >>>> Thanks, Danushka >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Pavithra Kulathilaka < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> One of a resource I referred was [1] which covers basic >>>>> details to start with workflow engines. Also they have done a >>>>> review on existing solutions for workflow applications and >>>>> their limitations with respect to scalability and on-demand >>>>> access. So I think this would be a great starting point. [1] >>>>> refers another research paper [2] (Chris has also mentioned >>>>> about this) which presents a detailed survey of existing Grid >>>>> workflow systems w.r.t their design, scheduling, information >>>>> retrieval, fault tolerant and data movement. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, Pavithra. >>>>> >>>>> [1] S. Pandey, D. Karunamoorthy, and R. Buyya, ³Workflow >>>>> engine for clouds,² Cloud Computing, Principles and >>>>> Paradigms, Wiley Series on Parallel and Distributed >>>>> Computing, pp. 321344, 2011. >>>>> >>>>> [2] A Taxonomy of Workflow Management Systems for Grid >>>>> Computing, Jia Yu and Rajkumar Buyya >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Sanjaya Medonsa >>>>> <[email protected] >>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I agree with Danushka. When it comes to workflow engines I >>>>>> think it is better to study general concepts of workflow >>>>>> engines first and then >>>>> study >>>>>> the prominent *Scientific* work flow engines (Some of the >>>>>> challenges are different from business workflow engines). >>>>>> Each prominent workflow >>>>> engine >>>>>> comprise of several unique features and concepts while >>>>>> major >>>>> abstraction is >>>>>> workflows. I would like to add Apache OODT into list of >>>>>> prominent >>>>> workflow >>>>>> engines (Workflow processing components are key part of >>>>>> Apache OODT and used in several NASA missions and other >>>>>> research) . I have already some work on these items and >>>>>> would like to contribute them into wiki. >>>>>> >>>>>> /Sanjaya >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I would say, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1. Science Gateways 2. Workflow Engines 3. >>>>>>> Data/Compute-Intensive Computing 4. Challenges and >>>>>>> Opportunities in Science Gateways 5. Research Directions >>>>>>> (Big Data, Provenance, Meta Data) (Maybe >>>>> relates >>>>>> to >>>>>>> 4) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Danushka >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Shahani Markus >>>>>>> Weerawarana < [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> HI All, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There are a few postgraduate research students who have >>>>>>>> done >>>>>> significant >>>>>>>> literature reviews on science gateways etc. Maybe it is >>>>>>>> time to >>>>> harness >>>>>>> all >>>>>>>> this background reading work that has been done >>>>>>>> individually and >>>>> list >>>>>> the >>>>>>>> papers (links) in categories on the Airavata website. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Danushka, Pavithra, and Sanjaya - what are your >>>>>>>> thoughts on the >>>>>>> categories >>>>>>>> based on the work you have already completed? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Shahani >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:22 PM, AMILA RANATUNGA < >>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thank you for the reply. I am also working in the >>>>>>>>> same project. We >>>>>>> looked >>>>>>>>> some research papers science gateways. We found some >>>>>>>>> interesting >>>>>> facts >>>>>>>>> about science gateways in the research paper >>>>>>>>> 'TeraGrid Science >>>>>> Gateways >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> Their Impact on Science' [1] which talks about 4 >>>>>>>>> successful >>>>> science >>>>>>>>> gateways including LEAD. And we got to know that LEAD >>>>>>>>> project has >>>>>>> caused >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> the development of AIRAVATA which is used to build >>>>>>>>> science >>>>> gateways. >>>>>>> And >>>>>>>>> the research paper '*Apache Airavata : A framework >>>>>>>>> for Distributed Applications and Computational >>>>>>>>> Workflows*' describes about some >>>>> work >>>>>>> flow >>>>>>>>> systems Taverna, Triana ..etc. And it says these are >>>>>>>>> tools to build science gateways. And we came to a >>>>>>>>> conclusion that AIRAVATA, Taverna, Triana doing >>>>>>> similar >>>>>>>>> kind of job (please correct me if I am wrong). And >>>>>>>>> tried to figure >>>>>> out >>>>>>>> what >>>>>>>>> is so unique in AIRAVATA comparing to theses. We >>>>>>>>> would like to >>>>> have >>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>> good references if we are moving in the wrong path >>>>>>>>> determining >>>>> what >>>>>> is >>>>>>>>> AIRAVATA. We are working full time in this project. >>>>>>>>> Your help is >>>>>> really >>>>>>>>> appreciated. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thank You ! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4668681&tag=1&ur >>>>>l=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D4 >>>>>668681%26tag%3D1 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> HI Harsha, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Airavata is a Distributed Computing framework in >>>>>>>>>> which Workflow >>>>> is >>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>> component. A good place to start is to do >>>>>>>>>> literature study on >>>>>> Science >>>>>>>>>> Gateways. We will need to compile a set of >>>>>>>>>> reference papers to >>>>> make >>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>> easy >>>>>>>>>> for you to get an understanding on. You will >>>>>>>>>> quickly realize the >>>>>> best >>>>>>>> way >>>>>>>>>> to find out differences in features in open source >>>>>>>>>> projects is >>>>>>> cracking >>>>>>>>>> open the code. So I suggest downloading the code, >>>>>>>>>> going through >>>>>>>> tutorials >>>>>>>>>> and asking questions on the corresponding mailing >>>>>>>>>> lists of the >>>>>> tools >>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>> are comparing against. You identified a good first >>>>>>>>>> list, please >>>>>> keep >>>>>>>>>> sharing your learnings so future users/students >>>>>>>>>> like you will >>>>>> benefit >>>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>>> your contributions. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Suresh >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mar 11, 2013, at 5:41 AM, Harsha Kumara >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi all! We are doing research on OGC's WPS >>>>>>>>>>> integration to the >>>>>>> Airavata.During >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> research we have found some existing work flow >>>>>>>>>>> generation >>>>> tools >>>>>>> like >>>>>>>>>>> Tarverna, Kepler , Pegasus and Triana. We would >>>>>>>>>>> like if we can some details and >>>>>> points >>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>>> how Apache Airavata is differ from those tools? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! -- *Harsha Kumara* *Undergraduate* >>>>>>>>>>> *Department of Computer Science and Engineering* >>>>>>>>>>> *University of Moratuwa* *Sri Lanka.* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- *Shahani Markus Weerawarana, Ph.D.* *Computer >>>>>>>> Scientist* Visiting Fellow, University of New South >>>>>>>> Wales, Australia. Visiting Scientist, Indiana >>>>>>>> University, USA. Visiting Lecturer, University of >>>>>>>> Moratuwa, Sri Lanka. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- Pavithra Kulathilaka. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) >Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org >Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > >iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRTEL1AAoJEOEgD2XReDo5ZmoH/1+RK9piuyh3uLXoE2qZThw6 >OU9e0oKK1w4gvyuGY4wdWWb0tKrR2GJGJzYzQoWt+F2xkbdA5OrHWm2LQjHyNi87 >O+hD6zGgDx0uReK9IFw4dUpFZHKCNUatKys69BDuc2uy7OdHQdSvzT6CEEXgOEN5 >2qkSf52tlFjS+zsO9mpDVW4XNGS4TzyhHGCZWIMJi3Vtj2cu+Kf8gZtCq+Zmndiu >8ioDbq+DLkMUsAhdSm2Z1Yi3VMg8zNhv+1VYfiUZKv8lBgqA16Ziv/c3axMfofgF >Kbka506bBQ+ZxB6ubAqGPMdB+Sqjcd/G1LwpTfNYjhJA19VidYghiQFZPHodakM= >=NfHF >-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
