-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Yes, +1, this is a good collection.
Marlon On 3/22/13 7:37 AM, Suresh Marru wrote: > On Mar 22, 2013, at 12:15 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Please find the wiki on related research literature at [1]. >> >> [1] - >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRAVATA/Related+Research+ >> >> Literature > > This is very good collection, Thanks Danushka. > > Suresh > >> Thanks, Danushka >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I would also recommend [3] and [4] for those of you who are >>> just stepping in. >>> >>> [3]A. Barker and J. Van Hemert, “Scientific workflow: a survey >>> and research directions,” Parallel Processing and Applied >>> Mathematics, pp. 746–753, 2008. >>> >>> [4]Y. Gil, E. Deelman, M. Ellisman, T. Fahringer, G. Fox, D. >>> Gannon, C. Goble, M. Livny, L. Moreau, and J. Myers, Report on >>> the 2006 NSF Workshop on Challenges of Scientific Workflows. >>> Citeseer, 2006. >>> >>> Thanks, Danushka >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Pavithra Kulathilaka < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> One of a resource I referred was [1] which covers basic >>>> details to start with workflow engines. Also they have done a >>>> review on existing solutions for workflow applications and >>>> their limitations with respect to scalability and on-demand >>>> access. So I think this would be a great starting point. [1] >>>> refers another research paper [2] (Chris has also mentioned >>>> about this) which presents a detailed survey of existing Grid >>>> workflow systems w.r.t their design, scheduling, information >>>> retrieval, fault tolerant and data movement. >>>> >>>> Regards, Pavithra. >>>> >>>> [1] S. Pandey, D. Karunamoorthy, and R. Buyya, “Workflow >>>> engine for clouds,” Cloud Computing, Principles and >>>> Paradigms, Wiley Series on Parallel and Distributed >>>> Computing, pp. 321–344, 2011. >>>> >>>> [2] A Taxonomy of Workflow Management Systems for Grid >>>> Computing, Jia Yu and Rajkumar Buyya >>>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Sanjaya Medonsa >>>> <[email protected] >>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I agree with Danushka. When it comes to workflow engines I >>>>> think it is better to study general concepts of workflow >>>>> engines first and then >>>> study >>>>> the prominent *Scientific* work flow engines (Some of the >>>>> challenges are different from business workflow engines). >>>>> Each prominent workflow >>>> engine >>>>> comprise of several unique features and concepts while >>>>> major >>>> abstraction is >>>>> workflows. I would like to add Apache OODT into list of >>>>> prominent >>>> workflow >>>>> engines (Workflow processing components are key part of >>>>> Apache OODT and used in several NASA missions and other >>>>> research) . I have already some work on these items and >>>>> would like to contribute them into wiki. >>>>> >>>>> /Sanjaya >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I would say, >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. Science Gateways 2. Workflow Engines 3. >>>>>> Data/Compute-Intensive Computing 4. Challenges and >>>>>> Opportunities in Science Gateways 5. Research Directions >>>>>> (Big Data, Provenance, Meta Data) (Maybe >>>> relates >>>>> to >>>>>> 4) >>>>>> >>>>>> Danushka >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Shahani Markus >>>>>> Weerawarana < [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> HI All, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There are a few postgraduate research students who have >>>>>>> done >>>>> significant >>>>>>> literature reviews on science gateways etc. Maybe it is >>>>>>> time to >>>> harness >>>>>> all >>>>>>> this background reading work that has been done >>>>>>> individually and >>>> list >>>>> the >>>>>>> papers (links) in categories on the Airavata website. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Danushka, Pavithra, and Sanjaya - what are your >>>>>>> thoughts on the >>>>>> categories >>>>>>> based on the work you have already completed? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Shahani >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:22 PM, AMILA RANATUNGA < >>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thank you for the reply. I am also working in the >>>>>>>> same project. We >>>>>> looked >>>>>>>> some research papers science gateways. We found some >>>>>>>> interesting >>>>> facts >>>>>>>> about science gateways in the research paper >>>>>>>> 'TeraGrid Science >>>>> Gateways >>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> Their Impact on Science' [1] which talks about 4 >>>>>>>> successful >>>> science >>>>>>>> gateways including LEAD. And we got to know that LEAD >>>>>>>> project has >>>>>> caused >>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> the development of AIRAVATA which is used to build >>>>>>>> science >>>> gateways. >>>>>> And >>>>>>>> the research paper '*Apache Airavata : A framework >>>>>>>> for Distributed Applications and Computational >>>>>>>> Workflows*' describes about some >>>> work >>>>>> flow >>>>>>>> systems Taverna, Triana ..etc. And it says these are >>>>>>>> tools to build science gateways. And we came to a >>>>>>>> conclusion that AIRAVATA, Taverna, Triana doing >>>>>> similar >>>>>>>> kind of job (please correct me if I am wrong). And >>>>>>>> tried to figure >>>>> out >>>>>>> what >>>>>>>> is so unique in AIRAVATA comparing to theses. We >>>>>>>> would like to >>>> have >>>>>> some >>>>>>>> good references if we are moving in the wrong path >>>>>>>> determining >>>> what >>>>> is >>>>>>>> AIRAVATA. We are working full time in this project. >>>>>>>> Your help is >>>>> really >>>>>>>> appreciated. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thank You ! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4668681&tag=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D4668681%26tag%3D1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> HI Harsha, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Airavata is a Distributed Computing framework in >>>>>>>>> which Workflow >>>> is >>>>> a >>>>>>>>> component. A good place to start is to do >>>>>>>>> literature study on >>>>> Science >>>>>>>>> Gateways. We will need to compile a set of >>>>>>>>> reference papers to >>>> make >>>>>> it >>>>>>>> easy >>>>>>>>> for you to get an understanding on. You will >>>>>>>>> quickly realize the >>>>> best >>>>>>> way >>>>>>>>> to find out differences in features in open source >>>>>>>>> projects is >>>>>> cracking >>>>>>>>> open the code. So I suggest downloading the code, >>>>>>>>> going through >>>>>>> tutorials >>>>>>>>> and asking questions on the corresponding mailing >>>>>>>>> lists of the >>>>> tools >>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>> are comparing against. You identified a good first >>>>>>>>> list, please >>>>> keep >>>>>>>>> sharing your learnings so future users/students >>>>>>>>> like you will >>>>> benefit >>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>> your contributions. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Suresh >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mar 11, 2013, at 5:41 AM, Harsha Kumara >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi all! We are doing research on OGC's WPS >>>>>>>>>> integration to the >>>>>> Airavata.During >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> research we have found some existing work flow >>>>>>>>>> generation >>>> tools >>>>>> like >>>>>>>>>> Tarverna, Kepler , Pegasus and Triana. We would >>>>>>>>>> like if we can some details and >>>>> points >>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>> how Apache Airavata is differ from those tools? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks! -- *Harsha Kumara* *Undergraduate* >>>>>>>>>> *Department of Computer Science and Engineering* >>>>>>>>>> *University of Moratuwa* *Sri Lanka.* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- *Shahani Markus Weerawarana, Ph.D.* *Computer >>>>>>> Scientist* Visiting Fellow, University of New South >>>>>>> Wales, Australia. Visiting Scientist, Indiana >>>>>>> University, USA. Visiting Lecturer, University of >>>>>>> Moratuwa, Sri Lanka. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- Pavithra Kulathilaka. >>>> >>> >>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRTEL1AAoJEOEgD2XReDo5ZmoH/1+RK9piuyh3uLXoE2qZThw6 OU9e0oKK1w4gvyuGY4wdWWb0tKrR2GJGJzYzQoWt+F2xkbdA5OrHWm2LQjHyNi87 O+hD6zGgDx0uReK9IFw4dUpFZHKCNUatKys69BDuc2uy7OdHQdSvzT6CEEXgOEN5 2qkSf52tlFjS+zsO9mpDVW4XNGS4TzyhHGCZWIMJi3Vtj2cu+Kf8gZtCq+Zmndiu 8ioDbq+DLkMUsAhdSm2Z1Yi3VMg8zNhv+1VYfiUZKv8lBgqA16Ziv/c3axMfofgF Kbka506bBQ+ZxB6ubAqGPMdB+Sqjcd/G1LwpTfNYjhJA19VidYghiQFZPHodakM= =NfHF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
