Hi, Please find the wiki on related research literature at [1].
[1] - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRAVATA/Related+Research+ Literature Thanks, Danushka On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura < [email protected]> wrote: > I would also recommend [3] and [4] for those of you who are just stepping > in. > > [3]A. Barker and J. Van Hemert, “Scientific workflow: a survey and > research directions,” Parallel Processing and Applied Mathematics, pp. > 746–753, 2008. > > [4]Y. Gil, E. Deelman, M. Ellisman, T. Fahringer, G. Fox, D. Gannon, C. > Goble, M. Livny, L. Moreau, and J. Myers, Report on the 2006 NSF Workshop > on Challenges of Scientific Workflows. Citeseer, 2006. > > Thanks, > Danushka > > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Pavithra Kulathilaka < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> One of a resource I referred was [1] which covers basic details to start >> with workflow engines. >> Also they have done a review on existing solutions for workflow >> applications and their limitations with respect to scalability and >> on-demand access. So I think this would be a great starting point. [1] >> refers another research paper [2] (Chris has also mentioned about this) >> which presents a detailed survey of existing Grid workflow systems w.r.t >> their design, scheduling, information retrieval, fault tolerant and data >> movement. >> >> Regards, >> Pavithra. >> >> [1] S. Pandey, D. Karunamoorthy, and R. Buyya, “Workflow engine for >> clouds,” Cloud Computing, >> Principles and Paradigms, Wiley Series on Parallel and Distributed >> Computing, pp. 321–344, 2011. >> >> [2] A Taxonomy of Workflow Management Systems for Grid Computing, Jia Yu >> and Rajkumar Buyya >> >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Sanjaya Medonsa <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> > I agree with Danushka. When it comes to workflow engines I think it is >> > better to study general concepts of workflow engines first and then >> study >> > the prominent *Scientific* work flow engines (Some of the challenges are >> > different from business workflow engines). Each prominent workflow >> engine >> > comprise of several unique features and concepts while major >> abstraction is >> > workflows. I would like to add Apache OODT into list of prominent >> workflow >> > engines (Workflow processing components are key part of Apache OODT and >> > used in several NASA missions and other research) . I have already some >> > work on these items and would like to contribute them into wiki. >> > >> > /Sanjaya >> > >> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > I would say, >> > > >> > > 1. Science Gateways >> > > 2. Workflow Engines >> > > 3. Data/Compute-Intensive Computing >> > > 4. Challenges and Opportunities in Science Gateways >> > > 5. Research Directions (Big Data, Provenance, Meta Data) (Maybe >> relates >> > to >> > > 4) >> > > >> > > Danushka >> > > >> > > >> > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Shahani Markus Weerawarana < >> > > [email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > > > HI All, >> > > > >> > > > There are a few postgraduate research students who have done >> > significant >> > > > literature reviews on science gateways etc. Maybe it is time to >> harness >> > > all >> > > > this background reading work that has been done individually and >> list >> > the >> > > > papers (links) in categories on the Airavata website. >> > > > >> > > > Danushka, Pavithra, and Sanjaya - what are your thoughts on the >> > > categories >> > > > based on the work you have already completed? >> > > > >> > > > Shahani >> > > > >> > > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:22 PM, AMILA RANATUNGA < >> [email protected] >> > > > >wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Hi, >> > > > > >> > > > > Thank you for the reply. I am also working in the same project. We >> > > looked >> > > > > some research papers science gateways. We found some interesting >> > facts >> > > > > about science gateways in the research paper 'TeraGrid Science >> > Gateways >> > > > and >> > > > > Their Impact on Science' [1] which talks about 4 successful >> science >> > > > > gateways including LEAD. And we got to know that LEAD project has >> > > caused >> > > > to >> > > > > the development of AIRAVATA which is used to build science >> gateways. >> > > And >> > > > > the research paper '*Apache Airavata : A framework for Distributed >> > > > > Applications and Computational Workflows*' describes about some >> work >> > > flow >> > > > > systems Taverna, Triana ..etc. >> > > > > And it says these are tools to build science gateways. >> > > > > And we came to a conclusion that AIRAVATA, Taverna, Triana doing >> > > similar >> > > > > kind of job (please correct me if I am wrong). And tried to figure >> > out >> > > > what >> > > > > is so unique in AIRAVATA comparing to theses. We would like to >> have >> > > some >> > > > > good references if we are moving in the wrong path determining >> what >> > is >> > > > > AIRAVATA. We are working full time in this project. Your help is >> > really >> > > > > appreciated. >> > > > > >> > > > > Thank You ! >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > [1] >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4668681&tag=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D4668681%26tag%3D1 >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > HI Harsha, >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Airavata is a Distributed Computing framework in which Workflow >> is >> > a >> > > > > > component. A good place to start is to do literature study on >> > Science >> > > > > > Gateways. We will need to compile a set of reference papers to >> make >> > > it >> > > > > easy >> > > > > > for you to get an understanding on. You will quickly realize the >> > best >> > > > way >> > > > > > to find out differences in features in open source projects is >> > > cracking >> > > > > > open the code. So I suggest downloading the code, going through >> > > > tutorials >> > > > > > and asking questions on the corresponding mailing lists of the >> > tools >> > > > you >> > > > > > are comparing against. You identified a good first list, please >> > keep >> > > > > > sharing your learnings so future users/students like you will >> > benefit >> > > > > from >> > > > > > your contributions. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Suresh >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Mar 11, 2013, at 5:41 AM, Harsha Kumara <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hi all! >> > > > > > > We are doing research on OGC's WPS integration to the >> > > Airavata.During >> > > > > the >> > > > > > > research we have found some existing work flow generation >> tools >> > > like >> > > > > > > Tarverna, Kepler , >> > > > > > > Pegasus and Triana. We would like if we can some details and >> > points >> > > > > about >> > > > > > > how Apache Airavata is differ from those tools? >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Thanks! >> > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > *Harsha Kumara* >> > > > > > > *Undergraduate* >> > > > > > > *Department of Computer Science and Engineering* >> > > > > > > *University of Moratuwa* >> > > > > > > *Sri Lanka.* >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > *Shahani Markus Weerawarana, Ph.D.* >> > > > *Computer Scientist* >> > > > Visiting Fellow, University of New South Wales, Australia. >> > > > Visiting Scientist, Indiana University, USA. >> > > > Visiting Lecturer, University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka. >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Pavithra Kulathilaka. >> > >
