On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 19:24, Leo Sutic wrote:
I think this is standard practice internationally. A copyright notice is *not* needed for copyright protection. You get that automatically.
yep (well almost - it depends on your country) - but that has nothing to do with what I am talking about. But without a license no user can use the file (well thats depends on place in the world actually). Explicitly stating incorrect facts in a "contract" when you know the facts to be incorrect is a little bit different.
The copyright year is not a fact in a contract. The *license* is one thing, the copyright is another.
The Apache License 2.0 will make this distinction more obvious and solve our issues once and for all.
Stefano.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
