Same thing, it requires some change in the dependency, especially for
the Jigsaw modules.

Regards
JB

On 06/10/2018 15:01, Arif Kasim wrote:
> Thanks all. What about Java 9 support?
> 
> 
>       
>       
>       
>       
> 
>       
> 
>     *  •  **Arif Kasim**
>     **  • * Strategic Cloud Engineer*
>     **  •  *Google, Inc.*
>     *  •  arifka...@google.com <mailto:arifka...@google.com>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 7:20 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com
> <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi Arif,
> 
>     AFAIK bytebuddy code is not java 11 friendly otherwise it runs (but
>     it means your pipeline is very very simple since it does not have a
>     dofn ;)) if your engine supports it. Also note that the modules not
>     being named you can have to use some weird import names or even
>     unstable ones if you want to use modules (but there is no real
>     reason to do that yet in java).
> 
>     Romain Manni-Bucau
>     @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>     <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>     <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>     <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>     <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>     
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
> 
> 
>     Le ven. 5 oct. 2018 à 19:10, Arif Kasim <arifka...@google.com
>     <mailto:arifka...@google.com>> a écrit :
> 
>         Hello,
>         What's the status of java version > 8 support for beam? Thanks.
> 
>         -Arif.
> 

-- 
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Reply via email to