I dont think so JB - until you want to use jlink but it is out of scope of beam - and since j9 didnt break unsafe it should work.
Le sam. 6 oct. 2018 17:23, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> a écrit : > Same thing, it requires some change in the dependency, especially for > the Jigsaw modules. > > Regards > JB > > On 06/10/2018 15:01, Arif Kasim wrote: > > Thanks all. What about Java 9 support? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * • **Arif Kasim** > > ** • * Strategic Cloud Engineer* > > ** • *Google, Inc.* > > * • arifka...@google.com <mailto:arifka...@google.com> > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 7:20 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > > <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > Hi Arif, > > > > AFAIK bytebuddy code is not java 11 friendly otherwise it runs (but > > it means your pipeline is very very simple since it does not have a > > dofn ;)) if your engine supports it. Also note that the modules not > > being named you can have to use some weird import names or even > > unstable ones if you want to use modules (but there is no real > > reason to do that yet in java). > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > > > > Le ven. 5 oct. 2018 à 19:10, Arif Kasim <arifka...@google.com > > <mailto:arifka...@google.com>> a écrit : > > > > Hello, > > What's the status of java version > 8 support for beam? Thanks. > > > > -Arif. > > > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
