Thanks for the clarification Ismaël.
* • **Arif Kasim* * • * Strategic Cloud Engineer * • *Google, Inc. • arifka...@google.com On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 9:41 AM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just wanted to clarify, there is already a JIRA for ongoing work on > Java 11 support. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2530 > > I led the initial work on supporting what at the time was Java 9/10, > so far the biggest blockers were around the ApiSurface tests (not at > all compatible with these versions) but at the time we were at 5 tests > from getting sdks/core passing. Notice also that the scope of this > JIRA evolved to support only the LTS version (Java 11), and > specifically to support only sdks/core + direct runner. Supporting all > IOs or runners really is more a question of the dependencies working > nicely with Java 11 so this will probably take long time. Also the > idea so far does NOT include supporting the Java module system at all. > > I stopped working on this during the move to gradle because it was too > hard to tackle both Java evolving and all the ongoing changes in the > build system. If somebody in the community wants to contribute in this > area it will be greatly appreciated, notice that all the work we did > on the build system for this needs to be implemented now in gradle > too. > On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 5:55 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > @Reuven: bytebuddy by itself no but the way beam tries to inject the > proxy class is. There are other strategies you can use in bytebuddy which > work. > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book > > > > > > Le sam. 6 oct. 2018 à 17:51, Reuven Lax <re...@google.com> a écrit : > >> > >> Romain, do you have any more details on the ByteBuddy incompatibility? > Is ByteBuddy incompatible with the Java 11 JRE, or just with new language > features? > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 10:20 AM Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Arif, > >>> > >>> AFAIK bytebuddy code is not java 11 friendly otherwise it runs (but it > means your pipeline is very very simple since it does not have a dofn ;)) > if your engine supports it. Also note that the modules not being named you > can have to use some weird import names or even unstable ones if you want > to use modules (but there is no real reason to do that yet in java). > >>> > >>> Romain Manni-Bucau > >>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book > >>> > >>> > >>> Le ven. 5 oct. 2018 à 19:10, Arif Kasim <arifka...@google.com> a > écrit : > >>>> > >>>> Hello, > >>>> What's the status of java version > 8 support for beam? Thanks. > >>>> > >>>> -Arif. >
