@Reuven: bytebuddy by itself no but the way beam tries to inject the proxy class is. There are other strategies you can use in bytebuddy which work.
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le sam. 6 oct. 2018 à 17:51, Reuven Lax <re...@google.com> a écrit : > Romain, do you have any more details on the ByteBuddy incompatibility? Is > ByteBuddy incompatible with the Java 11 JRE, or just with new language > features? > > On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 10:20 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Arif, >> >> AFAIK bytebuddy code is not java 11 friendly otherwise it runs (but it >> means your pipeline is very very simple since it does not have a dofn ;)) >> if your engine supports it. Also note that the modules not being named you >> can have to use some weird import names or even unstable ones if you want >> to use modules (but there is no real reason to do that yet in java). >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github >> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> >> >> >> Le ven. 5 oct. 2018 à 19:10, Arif Kasim <arifka...@google.com> a écrit : >> >>> Hello, >>> What's the status of java version > 8 support for beam? Thanks. >>> >>> -Arif. >>> >>
