+1 On 5/23/06, Thomas Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sounds like a good move. I'm for it. On 5/23/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Awesome! +1 from me. We could then use/ship WSM jars as part of Axis2 > for JSR 181 support (with some additional glue code on the Axis2 > side). > > -- dims > > On 5/23/06, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > All-- > > > > I'd like to propose that the WSM sub-directory in beehive/trunk be > > converted into a sub-project of Beehive. This makes it significantly > > easier to ship WSM independently of the rest of Beehive as it would be > > self-contained and wrapped in its own packaging. > > > > The motivation for this is a desire to make Beehive less monolithic > > in structure so that separable parts like WSM can evolve without being > > tied to the other pieces and to deliver on the obvious interest in > > JSR-181 in this TSS thread: > > > > http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=40280 > > > > The next step would be to release a real beta of WSM before the TCK work starts. > > > > Thoughts / comments / flames? > > > > Eddie > > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ >
