+1 (non-binding, just agree it's a good idea) -----Original Message----- From: Kenneth Tam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 5:23 PM To: Beehive Developers; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [proposal] wsm breakout
+1 FWIW, last time I talked to Eddie, the latest rev of the WSM code only works on Axis1, but that port shouldn't be a big deal. On 5/23/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Awesome! +1 from me. We could then use/ship WSM jars as part of Axis2 > for JSR 181 support (with some additional glue code on the Axis2 > side). > > -- dims > > On 5/23/06, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > All-- > > > > I'd like to propose that the WSM sub-directory in beehive/trunk be > > converted into a sub-project of Beehive. This makes it significantly > > easier to ship WSM independently of the rest of Beehive as it would be > > self-contained and wrapped in its own packaging. > > > > The motivation for this is a desire to make Beehive less monolithic > > in structure so that separable parts like WSM can evolve without being > > tied to the other pieces and to deliver on the obvious interest in > > JSR-181 in this TSS thread: > > > > http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=40280 > > > > The next step would be to release a real beta of WSM before the TCK work starts. > > > > Thoughts / comments / flames? > > > > Eddie > > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ > _______________________________________________________________________ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.
