+1 On 5/23/06, Rich Feit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 Daryl Olander wrote: > +1 > > On 5/23/06, Thomas Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Sounds like a good move. I'm for it. >> >> On 5/23/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Awesome! +1 from me. We could then use/ship WSM jars as part of Axis2 >> > for JSR 181 support (with some additional glue code on the Axis2 >> > side). >> > >> > -- dims >> > >> > On 5/23/06, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > All-- >> > > >> > > I'd like to propose that the WSM sub-directory in beehive/trunk be >> > > converted into a sub-project of Beehive. This makes it >> significantly >> > > easier to ship WSM independently of the rest of Beehive as it >> would be >> > > self-contained and wrapped in its own packaging. >> > > >> > > The motivation for this is a desire to make Beehive less >> monolithic >> > > in structure so that separable parts like WSM can evolve without >> being >> > > tied to the other pieces and to deliver on the obvious interest in >> > > JSR-181 in this TSS thread: >> > > >> > > http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=40280 >> > > >> > > The next step would be to release a real beta of WSM before the TCK >> work starts. >> > > >> > > Thoughts / comments / flames? >> > > >> > > Eddie >> > > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ >> > >> >
