+1 FWIW, last time I talked to Eddie, the latest rev of the WSM code only works on Axis1, but that port shouldn't be a big deal.
On 5/23/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Awesome! +1 from me. We could then use/ship WSM jars as part of Axis2 for JSR 181 support (with some additional glue code on the Axis2 side). -- dims On 5/23/06, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All-- > > I'd like to propose that the WSM sub-directory in beehive/trunk be > converted into a sub-project of Beehive. This makes it significantly > easier to ship WSM independently of the rest of Beehive as it would be > self-contained and wrapped in its own packaging. > > The motivation for this is a desire to make Beehive less monolithic > in structure so that separable parts like WSM can evolve without being > tied to the other pieces and to deliver on the obvious interest in > JSR-181 in this TSS thread: > > http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=40280 > > The next step would be to release a real beta of WSM before the TCK work starts. > > Thoughts / comments / flames? > > Eddie > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
