+1 On 5/24/06, Steven Tocco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 from me, sounds like a great idea. -----Original Message----- From: Eddie O'Neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 7:48 AM To: Beehive Developers Subject: Re: [proposal] wsm breakout Excellent -- good to see that there's general support for this. So far, I count: +1: 4 binding, 3 non-binding and no other votes. I don't expect to start on any of this until the weekend -- if there are any other opinions, there are a few days left to squawk. :) Eddie On 5/23/06, Steve Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > On 5/23/06, Carlin Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On 5/23/06, Rich Feit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Daryl Olander wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > On 5/23/06, Thomas Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Sounds like a good move. I'm for it. > > > >> > > > >> On 5/23/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > Awesome! +1 from me. We could then use/ship WSM jars as part of > > Axis2 > > > >> > for JSR 181 support (with some additional glue code on the Axis2 > > > >> > side). > > > >> > > > > >> > -- dims > > > >> > > > > >> > On 5/23/06, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > > All-- > > > >> > > > > > >> > > I'd like to propose that the WSM sub-directory in beehive/trunk > > > be > > > >> > > converted into a sub-project of Beehive. This makes it > > > >> significantly > > > >> > > easier to ship WSM independently of the rest of Beehive as it > > > >> would be > > > >> > > self-contained and wrapped in its own packaging. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > The motivation for this is a desire to make Beehive less > > > >> monolithic > > > >> > > in structure so that separable parts like WSM can evolve without > > > >> being > > > >> > > tied to the other pieces and to deliver on the obvious interest > > in > > > >> > > JSR-181 in this TSS thread: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=40280 > > > >> > > > > > >> > > The next step would be to release a real beta of WSM before the > > TCK > > > >> work starts. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Thoughts / comments / flames? > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Eddie > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > -- > > > >> > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.
