+1
Daryl Olander wrote:
+1
On 5/23/06, Thomas Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sounds like a good move. I'm for it.
On 5/23/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Awesome! +1 from me. We could then use/ship WSM jars as part of Axis2
> for JSR 181 support (with some additional glue code on the Axis2
> side).
>
> -- dims
>
> On 5/23/06, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > All--
> >
> > I'd like to propose that the WSM sub-directory in beehive/trunk be
> > converted into a sub-project of Beehive. This makes it
significantly
> > easier to ship WSM independently of the rest of Beehive as it
would be
> > self-contained and wrapped in its own packaging.
> >
> > The motivation for this is a desire to make Beehive less
monolithic
> > in structure so that separable parts like WSM can evolve without
being
> > tied to the other pieces and to deliver on the obvious interest in
> > JSR-181 in this TSS thread:
> >
> > http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=40280
> >
> > The next step would be to release a real beta of WSM before the TCK
work starts.
> >
> > Thoughts / comments / flames?
> >
> > Eddie
> >
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
>
