How would a book review fit into this? Jstor for example makes this a
separate type, with specific data for a reviewed article etc. One
could imagine having a collection of reviewed articles.
Yes, one could also just do this in the title field as people gave
done for years.
I guess that level of metadata is more akin to having a listed of
cited references than a separate type.
And there's nothing stopping the RDF format from allowing links to
cited works, perhaps even with citation types, of which a review would
be one. If such a link was in the record then special layout rules
could apply. But this seems to much of an edge case?
I'd also like to see an encouragement for not includng the year in the
'container' for conference proceedings/presentation.
Speaking of which how would this type system cover the common
practice of sing a conference presentation which doesn't publish
proceedings, and then making that available via a webpage?
--j
On Jul 30, 2007, at 11:40 AM, Bruce D'Arcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BTW, on the legal stuff, Marbux has some useful information in the
comments here:
<http://netapps.muohio.edu/blogs/darcusb/darcusb/archives/2006/09/26/reference-types
>
Bruce
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
