Sorry, I'm not somewhere I can look this up quickly ...

There are attributes in this DTD for sources, journal, conference etc.

http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/2.0/index.html

This might be helpful too.  It was the gold standard and still has a
fair amount of patina. http://www.diglib.org/preserve/hadtdfs.pdf

--Gannon
--- Bruce D'Arcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> So I'd like to review the current hierarchy of document and
> collections 
> types in the RDF ontology we're working on. Am cross-posting to the 
> Zotero and OOo bib dev lists. Please send suggestions ASAP (like end
> of 
> today).
> 
> Note: as I mentioned before, this is really quite hard, as I don't 
> really think there can be an ontologically pure modeling here, and we
> 
> have to be able to deal with often awkward legacy data.
> 
> I do think this list needs work though. We've just been focusing on 
> other details lately.
> 
> Also, I think we probably need a literal property that allows people
> to 
> give a little more information when the type itself can't convey it.
> 
> So this is the hierarchy, with my comments:
> 
> Collection
>       InternetSite
>       Series
>       Periodical
>               Journal
>               Magazine # we might drop this, or add Newspaper
>               CourtReporter
> 
> # How to deal with multi-volume books?
> # I guess could just use generic Collection?
> 
> Document
>               InternetDocument # I'm convinced we need this as a full type
>       Article
>       LegalCase # need input from lawyers here; not happy with this
>               Brief
>               Decision
>       Manuscript # I suggest dropping
>       Book # do we need a separate class for edited books?
>               Proceeding
>               Booklet # I HATE this vestige from BibTeX; let's cut it
>       Manual
>       Legislation # need help here too
>       Patent
>       Report
>               TechnicalReport # is this important?
>       Thesis
>               Dissertation
>       Transcript
>               Interview
>       Note # maybe it shouldn't be a subclass of Document?
>       Law # if we keep, should be subclass of Legislation
> 
> So obvious stuff we're missing beyond comments above?
> 
> No way to indicate letters, memos, phone conversations, etc.
> Transcript 
> might be problematic.
> 
> The Zotero guys wanted to treat communication as a separate class.
> E.g.
> 
> Communication
>       EMail
>       Letter
>       Memo
>       etc.
> 
> Bruce
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 



       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. 
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to