Hi all,

Louis Suarez-Potts wrote (23-11-2007 20:48)
I am the supposed lead of this project and I am not leading it at all, unless one counts leadership by neglect. I would like to change that as much as feasible :-)


The project has some problems: it's purpose is not clear and it

IMO the goal should be simple: provide a list of consultants supporting OOo. And make sure the list can be found.
(Pls see further below for my argument.)

maintains a large unwieldy database (actually just large list) of businesses. We have no real policy to filter this list and we ought to.

I have been working on related issues: to see about creating a filter for consultants offering support and services for OOo. The idea would be that those who offer services of a certain quality get listed; those who do not are not, at least not by OOo. As you may imagine, that's not been so easy.

I the Dutch NL project we talk about such a list and think of two or three catagories:
- consultants that contribute obviously/seriously to the project;
- consultants that support a little;
- others.

Still, I think it's a worthwhile goal. We need to make it easier for users--gov'ts, companies, individuals, education--to find and buy support and services.

If the list can be found, what else should the OOo project do? The home pages of the consultants websites should do the rest, isn't that?


(Disclaimer: my employer, Sun, offers support and services for OOo; but my goal is not to promote that company but the ecosystem.)

So: two things.

* let's create a database for the consultants' directory. Several of you over the years have volunteered. If you are still interested in helping, please step forward again.

All names would be transferred over.

* let's work on the certification process. The Community Council last year (and year before) agreed that OOo can and should come up with criteria for support. Not much happened; a boring subject for many. Last September, we moved this forward, and since then, there has been work. Sophie Gautier (cc'd here) has stimulated work to build on this certification syllabus [0]. Discussions are on [EMAIL PROTECTED], and you can see the archives. [1]

Please use the certification list if you wish to discuss this topic.

--

My interest again is in promoting the consultants. But the current set up makes it nearly impossible. Yet these consultants are key members of the OOo ecosystem, and we need to grow that.

IMO the OOo project should not promote consultants.
Provide a list that can be found: very good. But promoting ... No, the other way round: consultants act wise if they (help to) promote OOo in area where they want to have work to do :-)

Kindest regards,
Cor
(who's firm is listed as well.)



Best
louis



[0] http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OOo_Certification_Syllabus
[1] http://documentation.openoffice.org/servlets/BrowseList?listName=certification&by=date&from=2007-11-01&to=2007-11-30&first=1&count=36


--

Cor Nouws
Arnhem - Netherlands
nl.OpenOffice.org - marketing contact

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to