I created a wiki page for listing all the meeting notes <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/Community+Meetings> and the discussed proposals <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/BookKeeper+Proposals> .
Here is the notes of this meeting: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/2016-10-27+Meeting+Notes and the discussed proposal - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/BP-1+-+64+bits+ledger+id+support - Sijie On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Sijie Guo <[email protected]> wrote: > Ah, sorry, I forgot TimeZone. Yes, it is PDT. > > - Sijie > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Great! >> I think I will join the meeting, do you mean that 8am at San Francisco >> TimeZone ? in Italy it will be 5 PM and it very good for me >> >> Thank you >> >> >> 2016-10-26 12:44 GMT+02:00 Flavio Junqueira <[email protected] >> >: >> > It might be worth discussion the next release, who is going to be the >> release manager, important issues, etc. >> > >> > -Flavio >> > >> >> On 26 Oct 2016, at 00:50, Sijie Guo <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> I setup a bi-weekly sync-up meeting on Thursday 8am-9am >> >> https://goo.gl/6UZR1w >> >> >> >> We will start from this week (10/27/2016). The agenda of this meeting >> will >> >> be >> >> >> >> - Discuss Improvement Proposal - *64bits (even 128bits) ledger id >> support*. >> >> - Review and address concern for open pull requests. >> >> - Open discussion. >> >> >> >> Feel free to join the meeting if you are interested. We tried to find a >> >> time slot that is good for most of the committers in the community. If >> >> Thursday 8am-9am doesn't work for you and you are really interested in >> the >> >> topic of this week, feel free to ping this thread and we can make >> >> arrangement. >> >> >> >> - Sijie >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Sijie Guo <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Flavio, agreed. >> >>> >> >>> We are thinking of running the meeting in following form: >> >>> >> >>> - we will try to run a bi-weekly community syncup meeting to >> discussion >> >>> pull requests, jiras and such. If nothing to discuss, we will cancel. >> >>> - we will collect the topics to discuss prior to the syncup meeting >> and >> >>> send the agenda out. >> >>> - we are looking for meeting on Thursday, so that we can send the >> agenda >> >>> out early that week. >> >>> - we will have notes and keep them on the wiki >> >>> >> >>> I also liked the idea of KIP. There are quite a few improvements that >> come >> >>> up recently. We can also try to adopt the process of KIP (I can start >> a >> >>> different thread for that). >> >>> >> >>> - Security, Authentication and Authorization >> >>> - Ledger Id beyond 32 bits (64 bits, 128 bits) >> >>> - Ensemble placement for tier storage >> >>> - Disk corruption detection and repair >> >>> - .. >> >>> (JV also has a list of improvements to add :)) >> >>> >> >>> - Sijie >> >>> >> >>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Flavio Junqueira <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> I think it is great to have such meetings. The Kafka community, for >> >>>> example, organizes meetings to discuss KIPs: >> >>>> >> >>>> https://goo.gl/OK0Rhi <https://goo.gl/OK0Rhi> >> >>>> >> >>>> and if we have such meetings, I'd suggest we make sure to propose an >> >>>> agenda beforehand so that all people participated can join. Also, >> from an >> >>>> ASF perspective, please keep in mind that no decisions can be made >> offline. >> >>>> All project-related decisions need to happen via the mailing list or >> jira. >> >>>> The goal of the meeting should be for coordination purposes and >> potentially >> >>>> technical discussion around the project, issues, and code. >> >>>> >> >>>> -Flavio >> >>>> >> >>>>> On 13 Oct 2016, at 08:32, Sijie Guo <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Matteo, JV and me have tried running weekly syncup meetings for a >> while. >> >>>>> We'd like to extend it as the community syncup meeting - for >> technical >> >>>>> discussions, community matters and any sync-ups. The meeting is >> >>>> typically >> >>>>> comprised of 2 parts - the first part is going through any open pull >> >>>>> requests and newly open jiras and the second part is technical >> >>>> discussions >> >>>>> around issues and features and community matters (like meetups and >> >>>> events). >> >>>>> >> >>>>> We'd like to know if any other contributors are interested in >> >>>>> participating. If so, what are the best time to meet and how often >> it >> >>>>> should be? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> - Sijie >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> > >> > >
