Jose,

Thank you for your work on Apache Brooklyn and sharing your progress with
us. I'm not personally an expert with Cloud Foundry so I can't comment
directly on your work but you are in safe hands with Andrea :-)

There's two things that I would like to ask you (and Andrea) about. Firstly
is that I would obviously like to see this code get into an Apache Brooklyn
repository. Have you had any thoughts about the right long-term home for
this code?

Secondly, would you be wiling to give a 5-to-10 minute demo of the work you
have done? Emails are one thing but seeing something in action on screen is
really good! If you are up for this then I will see about organising a
lightning talks session for the community.

Thanks!

Richard.


On 17 August 2016 at 15:38, Jose Carrasco <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all again,
>
> Andrea and me are integrating Cloud Foundry services according to our last
> proposal description (below).
>
> An entity has beed developed which represents generic Cloud Foundry
> services and a more complex
> entity is focuses on MySql Cloud Foundry service (
> VanillaCloudFoundryApplication).
>
> VanillaCloudFoundryApplication allows create an instance of a available
> MySql service
> in the Cloud Foundry Platform, as you can see in the next blueprint.
>
> name: Vanilla CloudFoundry example
> location: pivotal-ws
> services:
> - type: org.apache.brooklyn.cloudfoundry.entity.
> VanillaCloudFoundryApplication
>   id: vanilla-app
>   brooklyn.config:
>     path: classpath://brooklyn-example-hello-world-sql-webapp-in-paas.war
>     buildpack: https://github.com/cloudfoundry/java-buildpack.git
>     services:
>     - $brooklyn:component("db”)
>     env:
>       brooklyn.example.db.url: $brooklyn:component("db").
> attributeWhenReady("service.mysql.jdbc")
>
> - type: org.apache.brooklyn.cloudfoundry.entity.service.
> mysql.CloudFoundryMySqlService
>   id: db
>   brooklyn.config:
>     serviceName: cleardb
>     instanceName: my-cleardb-instance
>     plan: spark
>     creationScriptTemplateUrl: classpath://chat-database.sql
>
> You can see that CloudFoundryMySqlService creates an instance of a
> available mysql service (in this case cleardb),
> initializes the database using a script.sql and and provides a jdbc
> database address through a sensor (service.mysql.jdbc).
>
> It allows services to be created by an blueprint together with the
> application (which is not supported currently
> by Cloud Foundry Manifest). Moreover, it is in charge of initializing the
> database (whether may be useful for users).
>
> So, we have a first working implementation of our proposal. Some unit and
> live test have been developed and it
> looks that we are taking a step in the right direction.
>
> With the help of Andrea (thanks a lot for that)  I was able to solve some
> questions about the services data management,
> we would like to know your opinion about some decisions that we are still
> considering, but let me stop here and share our
> questions in a different email, in order to avoid a long and unreadable
> mail.
>
> Thanks a lot.
> Best,
> Jose
>
>
> El 08/08/2016, a las 14:52, Jose Carrasco <[email protected]> escribió:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > as we mentioned previously, we have a pretty entity which allows an
> > application to be deployed on a Cloud Foundry platform by using a
> > new paas location, CloudFoundryPaasLocation.
> >
> > Here you can find a simple blueprint which shows the entity usage:
> >
> > name: CloudFoundryPaasLocation configuration example
> > location: pivotal-ws
> > services:
> > - type: org.apache.brooklyn.cloudfoundry.entity.
> VanillaCloudFoundryApplication
> >  id: vanilla-app
> >  brooklyn.config:
> >    name-app: name
> >    path: classpath://brooklyn-example-hello-world-sql-webapp-in-paas.war
> >    buildpack: https://github.com/cloudfoundry/java-buildpack.git
> >    domain: domain
> >    host: application-host
> >
> > You can find more examples in [1]. Currently, we are thinking about
> supporting
> > Cloud Foundry service. Documentation [2] says that an existent service
> can be
> > bound to an application. Then, it looks interesting to use a new entity
> to instantiate
> > a service, allowing users to create services and bind them to an
> application
> > from a blueprint.
> >
> > Following, you can find blueprint which shows my proposal to manage a
> service.
> >
> > name: CloudFoundryPaasLocation configuration example
> > location: pivotal-ws
> > services:
> > - type: org.apache.brooklyn.cloudfoundry.entity.
> VanillaCloudFoundryApplication
> >  id: vanilla-app
> >  brooklyn.config:
> >    name-app: name
> >    path: classpath://brooklyn-example-hello-world-sql-webapp-in-paas.war
> >    buildpack: https://github.com/cloudfoundry/java-buildpack.git
> >    domain: domain
> >    host: application-host
> >    bind:
> >    - instance_name
> >
> > - type: org.apache.brooklyn.cloudfoundry.entity.servies.MySqlService
> >  brooklyn.config:
> >    service-type: available_service #which was added to the platform by a
> broker
> >    instance-name: instance_name #used to bind the instance
> >    plan: plan_to_use #offers varying levels of resources or features for
> the same service
> >    creationScriptUrl: script.sql #script to init the database
> >
> > MySqlService is an entity which allows to create an instance of any
> mysql service.
> > Then,  Actually, all the services are created following the same method,
> a service
> > requires the service-type, the instance-name and the plan to be created,
> then it is
> > possible to create any service using a generic entity. However, it looks
> interesting
> > to create a entity for manage MySql services, because it will allow
> concrete operations
> > to be carried out, for example, it allows the database, which is created
> by the service,
> > to be initialized using a script.sql.
> > Currently, users have to initialize the database manually after creating
> the service,
> > so this proposal would facilitate the management of the Cloud Foundry
> services.
> >
> > Does it make sense for you? I will appreciate any advice and suggestion
> in order
> > to improve this idea.
> >
> > Best,
> > Jose
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/kiuby88/brooklyn-cloudfoundry/tree/
> 48c7710f8228acf548ea54469da403ff98dc84a8/src/test/resources
> > [2] https://docs.cloudfoundry.org/devguide/services/application-
> binding.html#bind
> >
> > El 05/08/2016, a las 19:17, Jose Carrasco <[email protected]> escribió:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Thanks Andrea for your report. As student I can say you are doing a
> great job as mentor, I am learning a lot about software architectures,
> patterns, and another principles to develop maintainable and testable code.
> I really appreciate that you spend a bit of time every day to direct me in
> the right direction.
> >>
> >> During this time we decided to model a PaasLocation in Brooklyn and to
> target initially CF. Then we focus on understanding the CF features and the
> CF manifest which to model what I ended up calling
> VanillaCloudFoundryApplication, which models a CF manifest and it is
> startable on a PaasLocation. It was necessary a lot of iterations to get
> the current architecture. First, it was decided how the Cloud Foundry
> services had to be managed by the location (through a client), we spend
> quite time chatting and developing examples time reach an extensible and
> useful and testable architecture. Once the first prototype was ready,
> Andrea suggested to introduce the driver pattern, allowing the entity to
> delegate the location management to an driver, what it looks interesting in
> order to generalize our solution. Currently, we are updating the Cloud
> Foundry client that we are using to manage the Cloud Foundry services, in
> order to obtain a more maintainable code. Once this task will be ready, I
> will explore how to generalize this approach to support more platforms
> without refactoring too much the current solution.
> >>
> >> Of course you can obtain a track and more concrete information about
> each of our task in our trello [1] board. A lot of aforementioned decisions
> can be also tracked following the open PR in [2].
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Jose
> >>
> >> [1]: https://trello.com/b/ZFfueDsu/gsoc2016
> >> [2]: https://github.com/kiuby88/brooklyn-cloudfoundry
> >>
> >> El 05/08/2016, a las 17:38, Andrea Turli <andrea.turli@cloudsoftcorp.
> com> escribió:
> >>
> >>> All,
> >>>
> >>> as GSoC mentor of [1] I'm happy to say that Jose is doing very well and
> >>> he's keeping up a great job on adding PaaS support to Brooklyn
> >>>
> >>> Jose Carrasco is being very active and productive during this period.
> He is
> >>> collecting his ideas and documenting his work in this folder [1]. He's
> been
> >>> quite active on IRC but we have also 1:1 conversations that he's keen
> to
> >>> summarize focusing with the design and the main technical decisions
> taken
> >>> along the way.
> >>> There is also Trello board [2] that we have reviewed with some of the
> >>> Brooklyn committers (Aled, Alex and Robert) Currently the code
> produced for
> >>> this project is available at [3] but it will be moved to an apache
> soon.
> >>>
> >>> If you are interested please let us know your thoughts/comments,
> >>>
> >>> Sorry for the belated update,
> >>> Andrea and Jose
> >>>
> >>> [1]: https://drive.google.com/a/cloudsoftcorp.com/folderview?id=0BxP_
> >>> HXE8tVoFazF4cUV0LXpYSTg&usp=sharing#
> >>> [2]: https://trello.com/b/ZFfueDsu/gsoc2016
> >>> [3]: https://github.com/kiuby88/brooklyn-cloudfoundry
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 2 May 2016 at 13:00, Jose Carrasco <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Andrea and all,
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for that. I will try to review and to make some contributions
> to
> >>>> the mentioned PRs. I have
> >>>> to develop the proposal that I update to Google Summer of Code,
> >>>> participate in the community,
> >>>> develop the documentation, etc. (as Andrea has mentioned) but It will
> give
> >>>> me great pleasure to
> >>>> collaborate in different tasks, and functionality developments :-)
> >>>>
> >>>> Just a pair of questions about the proposal. I have a pair of ideas
> about
> >>>> how PaaS entities could be added to
> >>>> Brooklyn (in fact, I tried a pair of PRs) . The proposal that I wrote
> a
> >>>> little description about that in the proposal
> >>>> that I wrote, but I should develop some diagrams about necessary
> entities,
> >>>> locations and how it has to be added
> >>>> to Brooklyn, then what should I do? should I write a Google Docs?
> should I
> >>>> open a PR directly? I would prefer to
> >>>> write a little document before coding. What do you think?
> >>>>
> >>>> I was a little contributor in a different open project,
> brooklyn-tosca. I
> >>>> tried different examples in order to find new
> >>>> possible functionalities there, but I was not actively involved
> either in
> >>>> the community chat or in the Mailing List.
> >>>> I do not want to be a spammer. Probably my routine should be
> different for
> >>>> GSoC, I should ask more questions
> >>>> about new functionalities and how they should be implemented before
> >>>> coding. Does the community use gitter?
> >>>>
> >>>> In other words, I am still a novice here and I have much to learn.
> Hence,
> >>>> I will  appreciate any advice and suggestion
> >>>> in order to improve my participation in the project.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks a lot.
> >>>> Best,
> >>>> Jose
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> El 02/05/2016, a las 11:36, Andrea Turli <andrea.turli@cloudsoftcorp.
> com>
> >>>> escribió:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi Jose,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We are now in the "Community Bonding Period (April 22 - May 22)". The
> >>>>> Community Bonding period is intended to get students ready to start
> >>>>> contributing to your organization full time in May.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We encourage you to try to become familiar with the community
> practices
> >>>> and
> >>>>> processes: participate on Mailing Lists / IRC and ask questions!
> >>>>> Set up their development environment: following
> >>>>> https://brooklyn.apache.org/v/latest/dev/index.html
> >>>>> Try to participate in code reviews for others. There is a
> documentation
> >>>> PR
> >>>>> open right now [1] or a small PR on brooklyn-server [2] you may want
> to
> >>>>> test to report your feedback or [3] in brooklyn-libray.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ideally code review should become part of your daily routine, but of
> >>>>> course, reading (and updating!) documentation and contributing to
> mailing
> >>>>> list / IRC will be appreciated as well.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best,
> >>>>> Andrea
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1]: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-docs/pull/49
> >>>>> [2]: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/127
> >>>>> [3]: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-library/pull/32
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 24 April 2016 at 22:00, Aled Sage <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> That's awesome - looking forward to you working on this, Jose!
> Please do
> >>>>>> keep the dev@brooklyn list informed of proposals, progress,
> questions,
> >>>>>> comments, etc. I'm sure that Andrea, myself and the rest of the
> >>>> community
> >>>>>> will be very happy to give opinions and help as appropriate.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Aled
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 23/04/2016 00:01, Jose wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi all!!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks a lot to all of you in particular to my GSoC mentor,
> Andrea. I
> >>>> am
> >>>>>>> really looking forward to start :-)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thank you very much
> >>>>>>> JoseEl 22/4/2016 23:21, Andrea Turli <andrea.turli@cloudsoftcorp.
> com>
> >>>>>>> escribió:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Good news for Brooklyn: the proposal got accepted [1]
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Congratulations Jose!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Andrea
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [1]:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/dashboard/
> >>>> organization/5694656234913792/proposal/6531111119224832/
> >>>>>>>> Il 14/apr/2016 11:10, "Jose Carrasco" <[email protected]> ha
> scritto:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi Andrea and all,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> sorry, I wrote “I hope that this link about Apache ranking
> process is
> >>>>>>>>> useful” but I did not put the link there.
> >>>>>>>>> Let me add the link here [1]. Probably, Google should score some
> >>>>>>>>> proposal
> >>>>>>>>> aspects but I would say that the mentor and the community should
> also
> >>>>>>>>> complete some documentation. In any case, I hope this task is not
> >>>>>>>>> painful
> >>>>>>>>> for you.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>> Jose
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> [1] https://community.apache.org/mentee-ranking-process.html
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> El 14/04/2016, a las 09:45, Andrea Turli <
> >>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>> escribió:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Jose,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> thanks for the reminder.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Reading https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/how-it-works/ I'd
> say
> >>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> GSoC commission will score the projects and will assign accepted
> >>>>>>>>>> project
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> mentors by April 22nd.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Andrea
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 14 April 2016 at 01:02, Jose Carrasco <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi all
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Firstly, I would like to thank all of you, specially to Andrea
> and
> >>>>>>>>>>> Aled,
> >>>>>>>>>>> the effort from your side.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I would like to remind the deadline description which was sent
> by
> >>>>>>>>>>> Aled:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> * 2016-04-12: Proposals to ASF projects must be reviewed
> roughly
> >>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>> have a potential mentor so that we know how many slots to
> request.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Proposals that don't have a mentor at this point will be
> >>>> down-rated.
> >>>>>>>>>>> * 2016-04-18: Proposal scoring must be completed. Proposals
> >>>> without a
> >>>>>>>>>>> score will be rejected, no exceptions.
> >>>>>>>>>>> * 2016-04-22: Accepted student proposals announced on the
> Google
> >>>>>>>>>>> Summer of Code site.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The proposal should be scoring by my mentor and the community
> (I
> >>>>>>>>>>> think)
> >>>>>>>>>>> before 2016-04-18. Please, feel free to read and score the
> proposal
> >>>>>>>>>>> according your priorities and requirements. Probably, you will
> >>>> found a
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> form
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> and the required documentation in your Web GSoC Application
> side. I
> >>>>>>>>>>> hope
> >>>>>>>>>>> that this link about Apache ranking process is useful for you.
> In
> >>>> any
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> case,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I am looking forward to hearing from you and do not hesitate to
> ask
> >>>> any
> >>>>>>>>>>> question you have. I am really happy with this and I, of
> course,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> understand
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> you need to review in depth the proposal and to take a decision.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks again.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Jose
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> El 13/04/2016, a las 08:57, Andrea Turli <
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> escribió:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Jose,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm indeed happy to mentor you.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I will try to add myself as a mentor and will update you
> shortly.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12 April 2016 at 23:48, Jose Carrasco <[email protected]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi again,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I found this link about becoming a mentor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://community.apache.org/guide-to-being-a-mentor.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jose
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> El 12/04/2016, a las 23:44, Jose Carrasco <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not have any link. I uploaded my proposal from a
> standard
> >>>> form
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the web and I selected Apache as a form’s field.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I only have this link
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://community.apache.org/gsoc.html#applying-for-gsoc
> but I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> think
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> already know it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I sent you in a private email the think to the proposal).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jose
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> El 12/04/2016, a las 23:39, Aled Sage <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Jose,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The timeline on https://community.apache.org/gsoc.html
> says
> >>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> next
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> steps are:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * 2016-04-12: Proposals to ASF projects must be reviewed
> roughly
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a potential mentor so that we know how many slots to
> >>>> request.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Proposals that don't have a mentor at this point will be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down-rated.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * 2016-04-18: Proposal scoring must be completed. Proposals
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> score will be rejected, no exceptions.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * 2016-04-22: Accepted student proposals announced on the
> >>>> Google
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Summer of Code site.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have a link (on the Apache site) to the application
> you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> submitted?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aled
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/04/2016 22:33, Jose Carrasco wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Aled.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will be very happy to work with Andrea Turli :-)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I cannot selected  a mentor and I can not see any assigned
> >>>> mentor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> my web profile,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably it may be added from Apache organization web
> profile.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Today it is the last day? Probably an extension will be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pair of days (I hope). Let me know if I need to do
> something,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or sending more information.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot for your reply.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jose
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El 12/04/2016, a las 23:24, Aled Sage <
> [email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jose,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for this - sounds like a great idea. I'm sure the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (myself included) will be very happy to support it!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe the next step is that you need a mentor in the
> >>>> Brooklyn
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community. I know that Andrea Turli would be happy to
> >>>> volunteer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> just
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> spoke to him offline).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to the timeline on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://community.apache.org/gsoc.html
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> /2016-04-12: Proposals to ASF projects must be reviewed
> roughly
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> have a potential mentor so that we know how many slots to
> request.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Proposals that don't have a mentor at this point will be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down-rated./
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Can you therefore ensure that your application says you have a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mentor, ideally updating it today? (I'm not sure what the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> process is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> this).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aled
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/04/2016 12:31, Jose Carrasco wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am Jose Carrasco (a.k.a kiuby88).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am very interesting on adding PaaS platform support
> to the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brooklyn project. I have already forked brooklyn
> projects and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> developed some first approaches to add CloudFoundry to
> Brooklyn.
> >>>> I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> opened
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> some PRs, and I obtained an excellent feedback. I would like
> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> update
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> my
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> PRs but I am very busy with the SeaClouds European
> open-project.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do think PaaS support could be a good feature, and I would
> >>>> like
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> continue that work. Because of that, I applied to Google
> Summer of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Code
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Apache organization. I updated a proposal about PaaS services
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> addition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Brooklyn. I think it is a great opportunity. I know Brooklyn a
> >>>> quite
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> well
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> (because I have develop some new entities for SeaClouds), and
> I
> >>>> have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> also
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> collaborated on cloudsoft/brooklyn-tosca project. I am really
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> interested on
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> this. Probably I should have written previously to the
> application
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Summer of Code, but I decided it too late and the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> application’s
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> deadline was so close..  I do not know if I can put the
> proposal
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> link
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> here.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> But if you are interesting I will be happy send it to you.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am looking forward to hearing from you and do not
> hesitate to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ask
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> any question you have.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jose Carrasco
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >
>
>

Reply via email to