Hi all,
still on the subject of previous email, let me expose some aspects of our
current work.
We are working in the MySql service management in order instance the database.
Once a service instance is bound to an application, the service instance data
(service
credential, service label, tags and other information) are added to the
application env.
(Please, note that this information is added to the application directly, the
service instance
which is created on Cloud Foundry platform does not contains this information).
The service instance data is added to the application env by means of a special
data structure
namely VCAP_SERVICES [1], which contains some fields such as name, label, tags,
credentials, etc.
Following, you can see an VCAP_SERVICES example of a mysql service (ClearDb
which is
available in Pivotal Web Service (I have used a json script to show the
information structure):
{
"VCAP_SERVICES": {
"cleardb": [
{
"credentials": {
"hostname": "us-cdbr-iron-east-04.cleardb.net",
"jdbcUrl":
"jdbc:mysql://XXX.cleardb.net/ad_XXXX?user=XXXX\uXXXXpassword=XXXX",
"name": "ad_XXXX",
"password": "XXXX",
"port": "3306",
"uri":
"mysql://XXXX:[email protected]:3306/ad_XXXX?reconnect=true",
"username": "XXXX"
},
"label": "cleardb",
"name": SERVICE_INSTANCE_NAME,
"plan": "spark",
"provider": null,
"syslog_drain_url": null,
"tags": [
"Data Stores",
"Cloud Databases",
"Web-based",
"Online Backup \u0026 Storage",
"Single Sign-On",
"Cloud Security and Monitoring",
"Certified Applications",
"Developer Tools",
"Data Store",
"Development and Test Tools",
"Buyable",
"relational",
"mysql"
],
"volume_mounts": []
}
]
}
Then, you can imagine that once the service is bound to the application, the
developed service entities
require to read the application VCAP_SERVICES in order to get the database
credentials and initialize
the database using the script.sql.
Currently, we are using a cf-java-client in order to use the Cloud Foundry REST
API. However, this client
returns the VCAP_SERVICES as a Map<String, Object>, so a lot of castings are
necessary to navigate
over the VCAP_SERVICES and get the required information (service instance
credentials). So, we think
the best solution here is develop a VCAP_SERVICE model (using the basic
VCAP_SERVICES fields).
Hence, when VCAP_SERVICES are required our approach creates a a VCAP object
using the fuzzy
data retrieves by the cf-java-client. Using a little model looks interesting on
this point, instead of having
different castings inside of our entities.
What do you think? should we avoid the model and use the map retrieved by the
client directly?
[1]
https://docs.run.pivotal.io/devguide/deploy-apps/environment-variable.html#VCAP-SERVICES
Best,
Jose
El 17/08/2016, a las 16:38, Jose Carrasco <[email protected]> escribió:
> Hi all again,
>
> Andrea and me are integrating Cloud Foundry services according to our last
> proposal description (below).
>
> An entity has beed developed which represents generic Cloud Foundry services
> and a more complex
> entity is focuses on MySql Cloud Foundry service
> (VanillaCloudFoundryApplication).
>
> VanillaCloudFoundryApplication allows create an instance of a available MySql
> service
> in the Cloud Foundry Platform, as you can see in the next blueprint.
>
> name: Vanilla CloudFoundry example
> location: pivotal-ws
> services:
> - type: org.apache.brooklyn.cloudfoundry.entity.VanillaCloudFoundryApplication
> id: vanilla-app
> brooklyn.config:
> path: classpath://brooklyn-example-hello-world-sql-webapp-in-paas.war
> buildpack: https://github.com/cloudfoundry/java-buildpack.git
> services:
> - $brooklyn:component("db”)
> env:
> brooklyn.example.db.url:
> $brooklyn:component("db").attributeWhenReady("service.mysql.jdbc")
>
> - type:
> org.apache.brooklyn.cloudfoundry.entity.service.mysql.CloudFoundryMySqlService
> id: db
> brooklyn.config:
> serviceName: cleardb
> instanceName: my-cleardb-instance
> plan: spark
> creationScriptTemplateUrl: classpath://chat-database.sql
>
> You can see that CloudFoundryMySqlService creates an instance of a available
> mysql service (in this case cleardb),
> initializes the database using a script.sql and and provides a jdbc database
> address through a sensor (service.mysql.jdbc).
>
> It allows services to be created by an blueprint together with the
> application (which is not supported currently
> by Cloud Foundry Manifest). Moreover, it is in charge of initializing the
> database (whether may be useful for users).
>
> So, we have a first working implementation of our proposal. Some unit and
> live test have been developed and it
> looks that we are taking a step in the right direction.
>
> With the help of Andrea (thanks a lot for that) I was able to solve some
> questions about the services data management,
> we would like to know your opinion about some decisions that we are still
> considering, but let me stop here and share our
> questions in a different email, in order to avoid a long and unreadable mail.
>
> Thanks a lot.
> Best,
> Jose
>
>
> El 08/08/2016, a las 14:52, Jose Carrasco <[email protected]> escribió:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> as we mentioned previously, we have a pretty entity which allows an
>> application to be deployed on a Cloud Foundry platform by using a
>> new paas location, CloudFoundryPaasLocation.
>>
>> Here you can find a simple blueprint which shows the entity usage:
>>
>> name: CloudFoundryPaasLocation configuration example
>> location: pivotal-ws
>> services:
>> - type:
>> org.apache.brooklyn.cloudfoundry.entity.VanillaCloudFoundryApplication
>> id: vanilla-app
>> brooklyn.config:
>> name-app: name
>> path: classpath://brooklyn-example-hello-world-sql-webapp-in-paas.war
>> buildpack: https://github.com/cloudfoundry/java-buildpack.git
>> domain: domain
>> host: application-host
>>
>> You can find more examples in [1]. Currently, we are thinking about
>> supporting
>> Cloud Foundry service. Documentation [2] says that an existent service can
>> be
>> bound to an application. Then, it looks interesting to use a new entity to
>> instantiate
>> a service, allowing users to create services and bind them to an application
>> from a blueprint.
>>
>> Following, you can find blueprint which shows my proposal to manage a
>> service.
>>
>> name: CloudFoundryPaasLocation configuration example
>> location: pivotal-ws
>> services:
>> - type:
>> org.apache.brooklyn.cloudfoundry.entity.VanillaCloudFoundryApplication
>> id: vanilla-app
>> brooklyn.config:
>> name-app: name
>> path: classpath://brooklyn-example-hello-world-sql-webapp-in-paas.war
>> buildpack: https://github.com/cloudfoundry/java-buildpack.git
>> domain: domain
>> host: application-host
>> bind:
>> - instance_name
>>
>> - type: org.apache.brooklyn.cloudfoundry.entity.servies.MySqlService
>> brooklyn.config:
>> service-type: available_service #which was added to the platform by a
>> broker
>> instance-name: instance_name #used to bind the instance
>> plan: plan_to_use #offers varying levels of resources or features for the
>> same service
>> creationScriptUrl: script.sql #script to init the database
>>
>> MySqlService is an entity which allows to create an instance of any mysql
>> service.
>> Then, Actually, all the services are created following the same method, a
>> service
>> requires the service-type, the instance-name and the plan to be created,
>> then it is
>> possible to create any service using a generic entity. However, it looks
>> interesting
>> to create a entity for manage MySql services, because it will allow concrete
>> operations
>> to be carried out, for example, it allows the database, which is created by
>> the service,
>> to be initialized using a script.sql.
>> Currently, users have to initialize the database manually after creating the
>> service,
>> so this proposal would facilitate the management of the Cloud Foundry
>> services.
>>
>> Does it make sense for you? I will appreciate any advice and suggestion in
>> order
>> to improve this idea.
>>
>> Best,
>> Jose
>>
>> [1]
>> https://github.com/kiuby88/brooklyn-cloudfoundry/tree/48c7710f8228acf548ea54469da403ff98dc84a8/src/test/resources
>> [2]
>> https://docs.cloudfoundry.org/devguide/services/application-binding.html#bind
>>
>> El 05/08/2016, a las 19:17, Jose Carrasco <[email protected]> escribió:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Thanks Andrea for your report. As student I can say you are doing a great
>>> job as mentor, I am learning a lot about software architectures, patterns,
>>> and another principles to develop maintainable and testable code. I really
>>> appreciate that you spend a bit of time every day to direct me in the right
>>> direction.
>>>
>>> During this time we decided to model a PaasLocation in Brooklyn and to
>>> target initially CF. Then we focus on understanding the CF features and the
>>> CF manifest which to model what I ended up calling
>>> VanillaCloudFoundryApplication, which models a CF manifest and it is
>>> startable on a PaasLocation. It was necessary a lot of iterations to get
>>> the current architecture. First, it was decided how the Cloud Foundry
>>> services had to be managed by the location (through a client), we spend
>>> quite time chatting and developing examples time reach an extensible and
>>> useful and testable architecture. Once the first prototype was ready,
>>> Andrea suggested to introduce the driver pattern, allowing the entity to
>>> delegate the location management to an driver, what it looks interesting in
>>> order to generalize our solution. Currently, we are updating the Cloud
>>> Foundry client that we are using to manage the Cloud Foundry services, in
>>> order to obtain a more maintainable code. Once this task will be ready, I
>>> will explore how to generalize this approach to support more platforms
>>> without refactoring too much the current solution.
>>>
>>> Of course you can obtain a track and more concrete information about each
>>> of our task in our trello [1] board. A lot of aforementioned decisions can
>>> be also tracked following the open PR in [2].
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Jose
>>>
>>> [1]: https://trello.com/b/ZFfueDsu/gsoc2016
>>> [2]: https://github.com/kiuby88/brooklyn-cloudfoundry
>>>
>>> El 05/08/2016, a las 17:38, Andrea Turli <[email protected]>
>>> escribió:
>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> as GSoC mentor of [1] I'm happy to say that Jose is doing very well and
>>>> he's keeping up a great job on adding PaaS support to Brooklyn
>>>>
>>>> Jose Carrasco is being very active and productive during this period. He is
>>>> collecting his ideas and documenting his work in this folder [1]. He's been
>>>> quite active on IRC but we have also 1:1 conversations that he's keen to
>>>> summarize focusing with the design and the main technical decisions taken
>>>> along the way.
>>>> There is also Trello board [2] that we have reviewed with some of the
>>>> Brooklyn committers (Aled, Alex and Robert) Currently the code produced for
>>>> this project is available at [3] but it will be moved to an apache soon.
>>>>
>>>> If you are interested please let us know your thoughts/comments,
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for the belated update,
>>>> Andrea and Jose
>>>>
>>>> [1]: https://drive.google.com/a/cloudsoftcorp.com/folderview?id=0BxP_
>>>> HXE8tVoFazF4cUV0LXpYSTg&usp=sharing#
>>>> [2]: https://trello.com/b/ZFfueDsu/gsoc2016
>>>> [3]: https://github.com/kiuby88/brooklyn-cloudfoundry
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2 May 2016 at 13:00, Jose Carrasco <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Andrea and all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for that. I will try to review and to make some contributions to
>>>>> the mentioned PRs. I have
>>>>> to develop the proposal that I update to Google Summer of Code,
>>>>> participate in the community,
>>>>> develop the documentation, etc. (as Andrea has mentioned) but It will give
>>>>> me great pleasure to
>>>>> collaborate in different tasks, and functionality developments :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Just a pair of questions about the proposal. I have a pair of ideas about
>>>>> how PaaS entities could be added to
>>>>> Brooklyn (in fact, I tried a pair of PRs) . The proposal that I wrote a
>>>>> little description about that in the proposal
>>>>> that I wrote, but I should develop some diagrams about necessary entities,
>>>>> locations and how it has to be added
>>>>> to Brooklyn, then what should I do? should I write a Google Docs? should I
>>>>> open a PR directly? I would prefer to
>>>>> write a little document before coding. What do you think?
>>>>>
>>>>> I was a little contributor in a different open project, brooklyn-tosca. I
>>>>> tried different examples in order to find new
>>>>> possible functionalities there, but I was not actively involved either in
>>>>> the community chat or in the Mailing List.
>>>>> I do not want to be a spammer. Probably my routine should be different for
>>>>> GSoC, I should ask more questions
>>>>> about new functionalities and how they should be implemented before
>>>>> coding. Does the community use gitter?
>>>>>
>>>>> In other words, I am still a novice here and I have much to learn. Hence,
>>>>> I will appreciate any advice and suggestion
>>>>> in order to improve my participation in the project.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks a lot.
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Jose
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> El 02/05/2016, a las 11:36, Andrea Turli <[email protected]>
>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Jose,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We are now in the "Community Bonding Period (April 22 - May 22)". The
>>>>>> Community Bonding period is intended to get students ready to start
>>>>>> contributing to your organization full time in May.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We encourage you to try to become familiar with the community practices
>>>>> and
>>>>>> processes: participate on Mailing Lists / IRC and ask questions!
>>>>>> Set up their development environment: following
>>>>>> https://brooklyn.apache.org/v/latest/dev/index.html
>>>>>> Try to participate in code reviews for others. There is a documentation
>>>>> PR
>>>>>> open right now [1] or a small PR on brooklyn-server [2] you may want to
>>>>>> test to report your feedback or [3] in brooklyn-libray.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ideally code review should become part of your daily routine, but of
>>>>>> course, reading (and updating!) documentation and contributing to mailing
>>>>>> list / IRC will be appreciated as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Andrea
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-docs/pull/49
>>>>>> [2]: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/127
>>>>>> [3]: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-library/pull/32
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 24 April 2016 at 22:00, Aled Sage <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's awesome - looking forward to you working on this, Jose! Please do
>>>>>>> keep the dev@brooklyn list informed of proposals, progress, questions,
>>>>>>> comments, etc. I'm sure that Andrea, myself and the rest of the
>>>>> community
>>>>>>> will be very happy to give opinions and help as appropriate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Aled
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 23/04/2016 00:01, Jose wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot to all of you in particular to my GSoC mentor, Andrea. I
>>>>> am
>>>>>>>> really looking forward to start :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you very much
>>>>>>>> JoseEl 22/4/2016 23:21, Andrea Turli <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Good news for Brooklyn: the proposal got accepted [1]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Congratulations Jose!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Andrea
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1]:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/dashboard/
>>>>> organization/5694656234913792/proposal/6531111119224832/
>>>>>>>>> Il 14/apr/2016 11:10, "Jose Carrasco" <[email protected]> ha scritto:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Andrea and all,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> sorry, I wrote “I hope that this link about Apache ranking process is
>>>>>>>>>> useful” but I did not put the link there.
>>>>>>>>>> Let me add the link here [1]. Probably, Google should score some
>>>>>>>>>> proposal
>>>>>>>>>> aspects but I would say that the mentor and the community should also
>>>>>>>>>> complete some documentation. In any case, I hope this task is not
>>>>>>>>>> painful
>>>>>>>>>> for you.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>> Jose
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://community.apache.org/mentee-ranking-process.html
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> El 14/04/2016, a las 09:45, Andrea Turli <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Jose,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> thanks for the reminder.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Reading https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/how-it-works/ I'd say
>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> GSoC commission will score the projects and will assign accepted
>>>>>>>>>>> project
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> mentors by April 22nd.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 14 April 2016 at 01:02, Jose Carrasco <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Firstly, I would like to thank all of you, specially to Andrea and
>>>>>>>>>>>> Aled,
>>>>>>>>>>>> the effort from your side.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to remind the deadline description which was sent by
>>>>>>>>>>>> Aled:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> * 2016-04-12: Proposals to ASF projects must be reviewed roughly
>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> have a potential mentor so that we know how many slots to request.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Proposals that don't have a mentor at this point will be
>>>>> down-rated.
>>>>>>>>>>>> * 2016-04-18: Proposal scoring must be completed. Proposals
>>>>> without a
>>>>>>>>>>>> score will be rejected, no exceptions.
>>>>>>>>>>>> * 2016-04-22: Accepted student proposals announced on the Google
>>>>>>>>>>>> Summer of Code site.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The proposal should be scoring by my mentor and the community (I
>>>>>>>>>>>> think)
>>>>>>>>>>>> before 2016-04-18. Please, feel free to read and score the proposal
>>>>>>>>>>>> according your priorities and requirements. Probably, you will
>>>>> found a
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> form
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> and the required documentation in your Web GSoC Application side. I
>>>>>>>>>>>> hope
>>>>>>>>>>>> that this link about Apache ranking process is useful for you. In
>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> case,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am looking forward to hearing from you and do not hesitate to ask
>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>>> question you have. I am really happy with this and I, of course,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> understand
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> you need to review in depth the proposal and to take a decision.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks again.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jose
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> El 13/04/2016, a las 08:57, Andrea Turli <
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jose,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm indeed happy to mentor you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will try to add myself as a mentor and will update you shortly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12 April 2016 at 23:48, Jose Carrasco <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi again,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I found this link about becoming a mentor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://community.apache.org/guide-to-being-a-mentor.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jose
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El 12/04/2016, a las 23:44, Jose Carrasco <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not have any link. I uploaded my proposal from a standard
>>>>> form
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the web and I selected Apache as a form’s field.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I only have this link
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://community.apache.org/gsoc.html#applying-for-gsoc but I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> already know it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I sent you in a private email the think to the proposal).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jose
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El 12/04/2016, a las 23:39, Aled Sage <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jose,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The timeline on https://community.apache.org/gsoc.html says
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> steps are:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * 2016-04-12: Proposals to ASF projects must be reviewed roughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a potential mentor so that we know how many slots to
>>>>> request.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Proposals that don't have a mentor at this point will be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down-rated.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * 2016-04-18: Proposal scoring must be completed. Proposals
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> score will be rejected, no exceptions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * 2016-04-22: Accepted student proposals announced on the
>>>>> Google
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Summer of Code site.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have a link (on the Apache site) to the application you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> submitted?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/04/2016 22:33, Jose Carrasco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Aled.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will be very happy to work with Andrea Turli :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I cannot selected a mentor and I can not see any assigned
>>>>> mentor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> my web profile,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably it may be added from Apache organization web profile.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Today it is the last day? Probably an extension will be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pair of days (I hope). Let me know if I need to do something,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or sending more information.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot for your reply.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jose
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El 12/04/2016, a las 23:24, Aled Sage <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jose,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for this - sounds like a great idea. I'm sure the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (myself included) will be very happy to support it!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe the next step is that you need a mentor in the
>>>>> Brooklyn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community. I know that Andrea Turli would be happy to
>>>>> volunteer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> spoke to him offline).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to the timeline on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://community.apache.org/gsoc.html
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> /2016-04-12: Proposals to ASF projects must be reviewed roughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> have a potential mentor so that we know how many slots to request.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Proposals that don't have a mentor at this point will be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down-rated./
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you therefore ensure that your application says you have a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mentor, ideally updating it today? (I'm not sure what the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> this).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/04/2016 12:31, Jose Carrasco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am Jose Carrasco (a.k.a kiuby88).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am very interesting on adding PaaS platform support to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brooklyn project. I have already forked brooklyn projects and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> developed some first approaches to add CloudFoundry to Brooklyn.
>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> opened
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> some PRs, and I obtained an excellent feedback. I would like to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> PRs but I am very busy with the SeaClouds European open-project.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do think PaaS support could be a good feature, and I would
>>>>> like
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> continue that work. Because of that, I applied to Google Summer of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Code
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache organization. I updated a proposal about PaaS services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addition
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brooklyn. I think it is a great opportunity. I know Brooklyn a
>>>>> quite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> well
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (because I have develop some new entities for SeaClouds), and I
>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> collaborated on cloudsoft/brooklyn-tosca project. I am really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> interested on
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> this. Probably I should have written previously to the application
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Summer of Code, but I decided it too late and the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> application’s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deadline was so close.. I do not know if I can put the proposal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> link
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> here.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But if you are interesting I will be happy send it to you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am looking forward to hearing from you and do not hesitate to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ask
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> any question you have.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jose Carrasco
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
