GSoC 2016 has come to a close - thank you Jose for your great effort
and thanks to the Brooklyn community for the opportunity!

Jose,
I still think it would be great to arrange your demo asap so that
others can see your work, let us know when you can and we'll help
promoting the event.

Best,
Andrea

On 17 August 2016 at 18:23, Jose Carrasco <jo...@lcc.uma.es> wrote:
> Richard,
> thanks a lot for you response.
>
> About the demo, I will be pleased to show our approach.
> Andrea and me are working currently in order to close the services management.
> We need to close a couple of questions, but we are very near. So, we reach a
> pretty solution in a couple of days (I think). So, we will be able to 
> organize a demo
> and show a couple of examples and answer your questions :)
>
> About, update the code. Currently I am working on a personal repository
> in github. But I would really like to see the code in Apache or similar, my 
> main
> goal is during this GSoC project is to developed something that will be useful
> for the community.
>
> I would also use this opportunity to sincerely thank to Andrea his effort 
> during
> this period.
>
> Best,
> Jose
>
> El 17/08/2016, a las 16:46, Richard Downer <rich...@apache.org> escribió:
>
>> Jose,
>>
>> Thank you for your work on Apache Brooklyn and sharing your progress with
>> us. I'm not personally an expert with Cloud Foundry so I can't comment
>> directly on your work but you are in safe hands with Andrea :-)
>>
>> There's two things that I would like to ask you (and Andrea) about. Firstly
>> is that I would obviously like to see this code get into an Apache Brooklyn
>> repository. Have you had any thoughts about the right long-term home for
>> this code?
>>
>> Secondly, would you be wiling to give a 5-to-10 minute demo of the work you
>> have done? Emails are one thing but seeing something in action on screen is
>> really good! If you are up for this then I will see about organising a
>> lightning talks session for the community.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Richard.
>>
>>
>> On 17 August 2016 at 15:38, Jose Carrasco <jo...@lcc.uma.es> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all again,
>>>
>>> Andrea and me are integrating Cloud Foundry services according to our last
>>> proposal description (below).
>>>
>>> An entity has beed developed which represents generic Cloud Foundry
>>> services and a more complex
>>> entity is focuses on MySql Cloud Foundry service (
>>> VanillaCloudFoundryApplication).
>>>
>>> VanillaCloudFoundryApplication allows create an instance of a available
>>> MySql service
>>> in the Cloud Foundry Platform, as you can see in the next blueprint.
>>>
>>> name: Vanilla CloudFoundry example
>>> location: pivotal-ws
>>> services:
>>> - type: org.apache.brooklyn.cloudfoundry.entity.
>>> VanillaCloudFoundryApplication
>>>  id: vanilla-app
>>>  brooklyn.config:
>>>    path: classpath://brooklyn-example-hello-world-sql-webapp-in-paas.war
>>>    buildpack: https://github.com/cloudfoundry/java-buildpack.git
>>>    services:
>>>    - $brooklyn:component("db”)
>>>    env:
>>>      brooklyn.example.db.url: $brooklyn:component("db").
>>> attributeWhenReady("service.mysql.jdbc")
>>>
>>> - type: org.apache.brooklyn.cloudfoundry.entity.service.
>>> mysql.CloudFoundryMySqlService
>>>  id: db
>>>  brooklyn.config:
>>>    serviceName: cleardb
>>>    instanceName: my-cleardb-instance
>>>    plan: spark
>>>    creationScriptTemplateUrl: classpath://chat-database.sql
>>>
>>> You can see that CloudFoundryMySqlService creates an instance of a
>>> available mysql service (in this case cleardb),
>>> initializes the database using a script.sql and and provides a jdbc
>>> database address through a sensor (service.mysql.jdbc).
>>>
>>> It allows services to be created by an blueprint together with the
>>> application (which is not supported currently
>>> by Cloud Foundry Manifest). Moreover, it is in charge of initializing the
>>> database (whether may be useful for users).
>>>
>>> So, we have a first working implementation of our proposal. Some unit and
>>> live test have been developed and it
>>> looks that we are taking a step in the right direction.
>>>
>>> With the help of Andrea (thanks a lot for that)  I was able to solve some
>>> questions about the services data management,
>>> we would like to know your opinion about some decisions that we are still
>>> considering, but let me stop here and share our
>>> questions in a different email, in order to avoid a long and unreadable
>>> mail.
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot.
>>> Best,
>>> Jose
>>>
>>>
>>> El 08/08/2016, a las 14:52, Jose Carrasco <jo...@lcc.uma.es> escribió:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> as we mentioned previously, we have a pretty entity which allows an
>>>> application to be deployed on a Cloud Foundry platform by using a
>>>> new paas location, CloudFoundryPaasLocation.
>>>>
>>>> Here you can find a simple blueprint which shows the entity usage:
>>>>
>>>> name: CloudFoundryPaasLocation configuration example
>>>> location: pivotal-ws
>>>> services:
>>>> - type: org.apache.brooklyn.cloudfoundry.entity.
>>> VanillaCloudFoundryApplication
>>>> id: vanilla-app
>>>> brooklyn.config:
>>>>   name-app: name
>>>>   path: classpath://brooklyn-example-hello-world-sql-webapp-in-paas.war
>>>>   buildpack: https://github.com/cloudfoundry/java-buildpack.git
>>>>   domain: domain
>>>>   host: application-host
>>>>
>>>> You can find more examples in [1]. Currently, we are thinking about
>>> supporting
>>>> Cloud Foundry service. Documentation [2] says that an existent service
>>> can be
>>>> bound to an application. Then, it looks interesting to use a new entity
>>> to instantiate
>>>> a service, allowing users to create services and bind them to an
>>> application
>>>> from a blueprint.
>>>>
>>>> Following, you can find blueprint which shows my proposal to manage a
>>> service.
>>>>
>>>> name: CloudFoundryPaasLocation configuration example
>>>> location: pivotal-ws
>>>> services:
>>>> - type: org.apache.brooklyn.cloudfoundry.entity.
>>> VanillaCloudFoundryApplication
>>>> id: vanilla-app
>>>> brooklyn.config:
>>>>   name-app: name
>>>>   path: classpath://brooklyn-example-hello-world-sql-webapp-in-paas.war
>>>>   buildpack: https://github.com/cloudfoundry/java-buildpack.git
>>>>   domain: domain
>>>>   host: application-host
>>>>   bind:
>>>>   - instance_name
>>>>
>>>> - type: org.apache.brooklyn.cloudfoundry.entity.servies.MySqlService
>>>> brooklyn.config:
>>>>   service-type: available_service #which was added to the platform by a
>>> broker
>>>>   instance-name: instance_name #used to bind the instance
>>>>   plan: plan_to_use #offers varying levels of resources or features for
>>> the same service
>>>>   creationScriptUrl: script.sql #script to init the database
>>>>
>>>> MySqlService is an entity which allows to create an instance of any
>>> mysql service.
>>>> Then,  Actually, all the services are created following the same method,
>>> a service
>>>> requires the service-type, the instance-name and the plan to be created,
>>> then it is
>>>> possible to create any service using a generic entity. However, it looks
>>> interesting
>>>> to create a entity for manage MySql services, because it will allow
>>> concrete operations
>>>> to be carried out, for example, it allows the database, which is created
>>> by the service,
>>>> to be initialized using a script.sql.
>>>> Currently, users have to initialize the database manually after creating
>>> the service,
>>>> so this proposal would facilitate the management of the Cloud Foundry
>>> services.
>>>>
>>>> Does it make sense for you? I will appreciate any advice and suggestion
>>> in order
>>>> to improve this idea.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Jose
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://github.com/kiuby88/brooklyn-cloudfoundry/tree/
>>> 48c7710f8228acf548ea54469da403ff98dc84a8/src/test/resources
>>>> [2] https://docs.cloudfoundry.org/devguide/services/application-
>>> binding.html#bind
>>>>
>>>> El 05/08/2016, a las 19:17, Jose Carrasco <jo...@lcc.uma.es> escribió:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Andrea for your report. As student I can say you are doing a
>>> great job as mentor, I am learning a lot about software architectures,
>>> patterns, and another principles to develop maintainable and testable code.
>>> I really appreciate that you spend a bit of time every day to direct me in
>>> the right direction.
>>>>>
>>>>> During this time we decided to model a PaasLocation in Brooklyn and to
>>> target initially CF. Then we focus on understanding the CF features and the
>>> CF manifest which to model what I ended up calling
>>> VanillaCloudFoundryApplication, which models a CF manifest and it is
>>> startable on a PaasLocation. It was necessary a lot of iterations to get
>>> the current architecture. First, it was decided how the Cloud Foundry
>>> services had to be managed by the location (through a client), we spend
>>> quite time chatting and developing examples time reach an extensible and
>>> useful and testable architecture. Once the first prototype was ready,
>>> Andrea suggested to introduce the driver pattern, allowing the entity to
>>> delegate the location management to an driver, what it looks interesting in
>>> order to generalize our solution. Currently, we are updating the Cloud
>>> Foundry client that we are using to manage the Cloud Foundry services, in
>>> order to obtain a more maintainable code. Once this task will be ready, I
>>> will explore how to generalize this approach to support more platforms
>>> without refactoring too much the current solution.
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course you can obtain a track and more concrete information about
>>> each of our task in our trello [1] board. A lot of aforementioned decisions
>>> can be also tracked following the open PR in [2].
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Jose
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]: https://trello.com/b/ZFfueDsu/gsoc2016
>>>>> [2]: https://github.com/kiuby88/brooklyn-cloudfoundry
>>>>>
>>>>> El 05/08/2016, a las 17:38, Andrea Turli <andrea.turli@cloudsoftcorp.
>>> com> escribió:
>>>>>
>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> as GSoC mentor of [1] I'm happy to say that Jose is doing very well and
>>>>>> he's keeping up a great job on adding PaaS support to Brooklyn
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jose Carrasco is being very active and productive during this period.
>>> He is
>>>>>> collecting his ideas and documenting his work in this folder [1]. He's
>>> been
>>>>>> quite active on IRC but we have also 1:1 conversations that he's keen
>>> to
>>>>>> summarize focusing with the design and the main technical decisions
>>> taken
>>>>>> along the way.
>>>>>> There is also Trello board [2] that we have reviewed with some of the
>>>>>> Brooklyn committers (Aled, Alex and Robert) Currently the code
>>> produced for
>>>>>> this project is available at [3] but it will be moved to an apache
>>> soon.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you are interested please let us know your thoughts/comments,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry for the belated update,
>>>>>> Andrea and Jose
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]: https://drive.google.com/a/cloudsoftcorp.com/folderview?id=0BxP_
>>>>>> HXE8tVoFazF4cUV0LXpYSTg&usp=sharing#
>>>>>> [2]: https://trello.com/b/ZFfueDsu/gsoc2016
>>>>>> [3]: https://github.com/kiuby88/brooklyn-cloudfoundry
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2 May 2016 at 13:00, Jose Carrasco <jo...@lcc.uma.es> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Andrea and all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for that. I will try to review and to make some contributions
>>> to
>>>>>>> the mentioned PRs. I have
>>>>>>> to develop the proposal that I update to Google Summer of Code,
>>>>>>> participate in the community,
>>>>>>> develop the documentation, etc. (as Andrea has mentioned) but It will
>>> give
>>>>>>> me great pleasure to
>>>>>>> collaborate in different tasks, and functionality developments :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just a pair of questions about the proposal. I have a pair of ideas
>>> about
>>>>>>> how PaaS entities could be added to
>>>>>>> Brooklyn (in fact, I tried a pair of PRs) . The proposal that I wrote
>>> a
>>>>>>> little description about that in the proposal
>>>>>>> that I wrote, but I should develop some diagrams about necessary
>>> entities,
>>>>>>> locations and how it has to be added
>>>>>>> to Brooklyn, then what should I do? should I write a Google Docs?
>>> should I
>>>>>>> open a PR directly? I would prefer to
>>>>>>> write a little document before coding. What do you think?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was a little contributor in a different open project,
>>> brooklyn-tosca. I
>>>>>>> tried different examples in order to find new
>>>>>>> possible functionalities there, but I was not actively involved
>>> either in
>>>>>>> the community chat or in the Mailing List.
>>>>>>> I do not want to be a spammer. Probably my routine should be
>>> different for
>>>>>>> GSoC, I should ask more questions
>>>>>>> about new functionalities and how they should be implemented before
>>>>>>> coding. Does the community use gitter?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In other words, I am still a novice here and I have much to learn.
>>> Hence,
>>>>>>> I will  appreciate any advice and suggestion
>>>>>>> in order to improve my participation in the project.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks a lot.
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Jose
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> El 02/05/2016, a las 11:36, Andrea Turli <andrea.turli@cloudsoftcorp.
>>> com>
>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Jose,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We are now in the "Community Bonding Period (April 22 - May 22)". The
>>>>>>>> Community Bonding period is intended to get students ready to start
>>>>>>>> contributing to your organization full time in May.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We encourage you to try to become familiar with the community
>>> practices
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> processes: participate on Mailing Lists / IRC and ask questions!
>>>>>>>> Set up their development environment: following
>>>>>>>> https://brooklyn.apache.org/v/latest/dev/index.html
>>>>>>>> Try to participate in code reviews for others. There is a
>>> documentation
>>>>>>> PR
>>>>>>>> open right now [1] or a small PR on brooklyn-server [2] you may want
>>> to
>>>>>>>> test to report your feedback or [3] in brooklyn-libray.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ideally code review should become part of your daily routine, but of
>>>>>>>> course, reading (and updating!) documentation and contributing to
>>> mailing
>>>>>>>> list / IRC will be appreciated as well.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> Andrea
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1]: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-docs/pull/49
>>>>>>>> [2]: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/127
>>>>>>>> [3]: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-library/pull/32
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 24 April 2016 at 22:00, Aled Sage <aled.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That's awesome - looking forward to you working on this, Jose!
>>> Please do
>>>>>>>>> keep the dev@brooklyn list informed of proposals, progress,
>>> questions,
>>>>>>>>> comments, etc. I'm sure that Andrea, myself and the rest of the
>>>>>>> community
>>>>>>>>> will be very happy to give opinions and help as appropriate.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Aled
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 23/04/2016 00:01, Jose wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all!!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot to all of you in particular to my GSoC mentor,
>>> Andrea. I
>>>>>>> am
>>>>>>>>>> really looking forward to start :-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much
>>>>>>>>>> JoseEl 22/4/2016 23:21, Andrea Turli <andrea.turli@cloudsoftcorp.
>>> com>
>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Good news for Brooklyn: the proposal got accepted [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Congratulations Jose!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [1]:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/dashboard/
>>>>>>> organization/5694656234913792/proposal/6531111119224832/
>>>>>>>>>>> Il 14/apr/2016 11:10, "Jose Carrasco" <jo...@lcc.uma.es> ha
>>> scritto:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Andrea and all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> sorry, I wrote “I hope that this link about Apache ranking
>>> process is
>>>>>>>>>>>> useful” but I did not put the link there.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me add the link here [1]. Probably, Google should score some
>>>>>>>>>>>> proposal
>>>>>>>>>>>> aspects but I would say that the mentor and the community should
>>> also
>>>>>>>>>>>> complete some documentation. In any case, I hope this task is not
>>>>>>>>>>>> painful
>>>>>>>>>>>> for you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jose
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://community.apache.org/mentee-ranking-process.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> El 14/04/2016, a las 09:45, Andrea Turli <
>>>>>>>>>>>> andrea.tu...@cloudsoftcorp.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jose,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks for the reminder.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reading https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/how-it-works/ I'd
>>> say
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> GSoC commission will score the projects and will assign accepted
>>>>>>>>>>>>> project
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mentors by April 22nd.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14 April 2016 at 01:02, Jose Carrasco <jo...@lcc.uma.es>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Firstly, I would like to thank all of you, specially to Andrea
>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aled,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the effort from your side.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to remind the deadline description which was sent
>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aled:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * 2016-04-12: Proposals to ASF projects must be reviewed
>>> roughly
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a potential mentor so that we know how many slots to
>>> request.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Proposals that don't have a mentor at this point will be
>>>>>>> down-rated.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * 2016-04-18: Proposal scoring must be completed. Proposals
>>>>>>> without a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> score will be rejected, no exceptions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * 2016-04-22: Accepted student proposals announced on the
>>> Google
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Summer of Code site.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The proposal should be scoring by my mentor and the community
>>> (I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before 2016-04-18. Please, feel free to read and score the
>>> proposal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> according your priorities and requirements. Probably, you will
>>>>>>> found a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> form
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the required documentation in your Web GSoC Application
>>> side. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hope
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that this link about Apache ranking process is useful for you.
>>> In
>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> case,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am looking forward to hearing from you and do not hesitate to
>>> ask
>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question you have. I am really happy with this and I, of
>>> course,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> understand
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you need to review in depth the proposal and to take a decision.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jose
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El 13/04/2016, a las 08:57, Andrea Turli <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> andrea.tu...@cloudsoftcorp.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jose,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm indeed happy to mentor you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will try to add myself as a mentor and will update you
>>> shortly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12 April 2016 at 23:48, Jose Carrasco <jo...@lcc.uma.es>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi again,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I found this link about becoming a mentor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://community.apache.org/guide-to-being-a-mentor.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jose
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El 12/04/2016, a las 23:44, Jose Carrasco <jo...@lcc.uma.es>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not have any link. I uploaded my proposal from a
>>> standard
>>>>>>> form
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the web and I selected Apache as a form’s field.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I only have this link
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://community.apache.org/gsoc.html#applying-for-gsoc
>>> but I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already know it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I sent you in a private email the think to the proposal).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jose
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El 12/04/2016, a las 23:39, Aled Sage <aled.s...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jose,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The timeline on https://community.apache.org/gsoc.html
>>> says
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> steps are:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * 2016-04-12: Proposals to ASF projects must be reviewed
>>> roughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a potential mentor so that we know how many slots to
>>>>>>> request.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Proposals that don't have a mentor at this point will be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down-rated.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * 2016-04-18: Proposal scoring must be completed. Proposals
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> score will be rejected, no exceptions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * 2016-04-22: Accepted student proposals announced on the
>>>>>>> Google
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Summer of Code site.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have a link (on the Apache site) to the application
>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> submitted?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/04/2016 22:33, Jose Carrasco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Aled.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will be very happy to work with Andrea Turli :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I cannot selected  a mentor and I can not see any assigned
>>>>>>> mentor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my web profile,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably it may be added from Apache organization web
>>> profile.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Today it is the last day? Probably an extension will be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pair of days (I hope). Let me know if I need to do
>>> something,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or sending more information.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot for your reply.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jose
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El 12/04/2016, a las 23:24, Aled Sage <
>>> aled.s...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jose,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for this - sounds like a great idea. I'm sure the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (myself included) will be very happy to support it!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe the next step is that you need a mentor in the
>>>>>>> Brooklyn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community. I know that Andrea Turli would be happy to
>>>>>>> volunteer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> spoke to him offline).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to the timeline on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://community.apache.org/gsoc.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /2016-04-12: Proposals to ASF projects must be reviewed
>>> roughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a potential mentor so that we know how many slots to
>>> request.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Proposals that don't have a mentor at this point will be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down-rated./
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you therefore ensure that your application says you have a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mentor, ideally updating it today? (I'm not sure what the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> this).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/04/2016 12:31, Jose Carrasco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am Jose Carrasco (a.k.a kiuby88).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am very interesting on adding PaaS platform support
>>> to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brooklyn project. I have already forked brooklyn
>>> projects and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> developed some first approaches to add CloudFoundry to
>>> Brooklyn.
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opened
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some PRs, and I obtained an excellent feedback. I would like
>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PRs but I am very busy with the SeaClouds European
>>> open-project.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do think PaaS support could be a good feature, and I would
>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> continue that work. Because of that, I applied to Google
>>> Summer of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Code
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache organization. I updated a proposal about PaaS services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addition
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brooklyn. I think it is a great opportunity. I know Brooklyn a
>>>>>>> quite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (because I have develop some new entities for SeaClouds), and
>>> I
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collaborated on cloudsoft/brooklyn-tosca project. I am really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interested on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this. Probably I should have written previously to the
>>> application
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Summer of Code, but I decided it too late and the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> application’s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deadline was so close..  I do not know if I can put the
>>> proposal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> link
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But if you are interesting I will be happy send it to you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am looking forward to hearing from you and do not
>>> hesitate to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> any question you have.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jose Carrasco
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to