There's some information [¹] about what it is supported and what it is coming, like support for search engine
[1] https://zulipchat.com/for/open-source/ --- Luca Burgazzoli On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 10:47 AM Alex Dettinger <aldettin...@gmail.com> wrote: > No strong opinion about which one is the best. > However, I find it interesting that gitter conversations could be included > in search engine results (at least google). > However, I don't know if we would have this with Zulip or Slack. > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 10:11 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > > > Maybe it would be great to have a test period of zulip. > > > > I never used it, so, I can’t say if it’s good or not. > > > > So, maybe experimenting a bit to have feedback would be great. > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > > Le 21 août 2020 à 10:07, Luca Burgazzoli <lburgazz...@gmail.com> a > > écrit : > > > > > > --- > > > Luca Burgazzoli > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 7:23 PM Zoran Regvart <zo...@regvart.com> > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Cameleers, > > >> I also think Gitter is a bit hard to follow, especially when there are > > >> a lot of messages flowing by (reminds me of IRC). > > >> > > >> I do wonder how Zulip would be set up, I don't see an OpenSource plan > > >> on zulipchat.com[1] and I don't think it's good practice for an open > > >> source community to lose messages. Gitter offers unlimited history[2]. > > >> > > >> > > > It looks like that zulip cloud standard is free for open source > projects > > > according to the FAQs https://zulipchat.com/plans or I'm reading it > > wrong ? > > > > > > > > >> We could try to ask INFRA to provide a Zulip service Camel/ASF wide. > > >> > > >> zoran > > >> > > >> [1] https://zulipchat.com/plans/ > > >> [2] > > https://gitter.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/202169471-Message-history > > >> > > >> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 1:12 PM Luca Burgazzoli < > lburgazz...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Hello, > > >>> > > >>> Over the past months I've been trying to be more active on gitter on > > the > > >>> various camel projects and overall the user experience was quite > > >> terrible > > >>> for me (in particular when using the mobile client), as example: > > >>> > > >>> - threads are not shown properly on the iOS client thus messages are > > >>> messing up > > >>> - messages are extremely slow to load and sometime the message you > sent > > >>> take quite long to be visible even on your end so you don't actually > > know > > >>> what it is happening > > >>> - messages keep being marked as unread even if you did read them > > >>> - sometimes you need to close/reopen the thread sidebar to see new > > >> messages > > >>> for a given thread > > >>> > > >>> I don't know if it is only me but because of my frustration with the > > tool > > >>> I'd like to know if anyone is interested in evaluating some > > alternatives > > >>> (please note that we DON'T necessarily need to switch to something > > >>> different). > > >>> > > >>> I'd personally would like to suggest to try out Zulip ( > > >>> https://zulipchat.com/) as it allow us to have an independent > > >> organization ( > > >>> camel.zulipchat.com) and to login with github/gitter/google so you > can > > >>> easily join without having to fill gazillion of details but I know > it's > > >>> streams and topic way of organizing conversations may not be optimal > > for > > >>> everyone. > > >>> > > >>> If anyone has suggestions, let discuss here. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> --- > > >>> Luca Burgazzoli > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Zoran Regvart > > >> > > > > >
